Elon Musk’s SpaceX moves Bitcoin — First major on-chain activity since July

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-10-21Обновлено 2025-10-21

Key Takeaways

What did SpaceX do with its Bitcoin holdings?

The company became active and transferred $268.5 million worth of BTC across internal wallets.

Did the move affect Bitcoin’s price?

No major volatility followed. BTC rose 3.44% in the past 12 hours to $112,340, suggesting markets viewed it as non-liquidation activity.

SpaceX has transferred roughly $268.5 million worth of Bitcoin across wallets, according to on-chain data from Arkham Intelligence.

The move is its first significant activity since July, when the company’s Bitcoin holdings moved for the first time in three years.

Arkham’s data shows that 90 BTC and 10 BTC were sent to separate addresses, while around $257.7 million worth of Bitcoin remains within SpaceX-controlled wallets.

The structure mirrors the firm’s July 2025 activity, which was widely viewed as custodial or treasury rebalancing rather than liquidation.

SpaceX’s Bitcoin portfolio

Arkham data indicates that SpaceX’s Bitcoin holdings are 5,790 BTC, valued at approximately $648.3 million. Also, the portfolio showed a 1.36% daily gain in value.

This makes SpaceX one of the largest private corporate holders of Bitcoin, alongside Tesla and Strategy.

Tesla, another of Elon Musk’s companies, currently holds over 11,500 BTC, making it the 11th largest corporate holder.

When SpaceX last moved funds in July, the transaction broke a three-year silence since 2022. At the time, blockchain analysts confirmed that no BTC was sent to exchanges. This observation appears consistent with today’s movement.

Market response

Despite the multi-million-dollar transfer, Bitcoin prices remained stable, suggesting investors interpreted the movement as routine treasury activity.

Source: TradingView

However, the broader market showed signs of strength, with BTC rebounding 3.44% in the past 12 hours to $112,340. It has recovered from last week’s dip below $107,000.

Traders on X speculated whether the movement indicates preparations for a new custody setup or institutional collaboration.

However, most agreed it’s part of SpaceX’s ongoing portfolio management strategy.

For now, SpaceX’s on-chain posture continues to show active but unspent holdings, reinforcing its long-term alignment with Bitcoin exposure rather than short-term trading.

Похожее

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

Title: The Trillion-Dollar Memory Seller's Carnival vs. The Buyer's Halved Profits On May 26, a stark contrast unfolded. While memory chipmaker Micron's market cap surged past $1 trillion, smartphone maker Xiaomi reported plummeting profits. Xiaomi's Q1 2026 profits fell 43% year-on-year. Executive Lu Weibing cited memory prices quadrupling from last year, adding roughly $210 to a phone's cost. To survive, Xiaomi is cutting entry-level models, sacrificing volume. Micron's stock, however, skyrocketed over 19% in a day, capping an 8x gain in a year. Major banks like UBS and JPMorgan issued bullish reports, raising price targets drastically. Their core thesis: Long-Term Agreements (LTAs) with AI cloud giants (Microsoft, Google, etc.) are eliminating the memory industry's notorious boom-bust cycle. By locking in fixed-price, multi-year contracts for AI-grade memory (HBM, server DDR5), these deals promise stable, utility-like earnings, justifying a higher valuation (20-30x P/E vs. the historical 8-15x). The article reveals a three-tiered memory market in 2026: 1) **AI Storage (HBM/DDR5/Enterprise SSD)**: Extreme shortage, soaring prices, LTAs. This is Micron's story. 2) **Mobile/Embedded Memory**: Also facing sharp price hikes as AI production crowds out capacity, severely pressuring phone makers like Xiaomi. 3) **PC Retail**: Some spot prices are falling due to channel inventory liquidation, creating a divergence from contract markets. The author questions if LTAs truly end the cycle. It hinges on sustained, hyper-growth AI demand. Micron's current profits are at a cycle peak, driven mostly by price hikes, not volume. If AI capital expenditure growth slows, the massive industry capacity expansion (e.g., Micron's $250B+ CapEx plan) could lead to a glut. Historically, using peak-cycle earnings for valuation is a classic trap. While the AI-driven structural shift might be real, the unanimous Wall Street euphoria warrants caution, echoing past bubbles like Cisco's in 2000. The memory seller's trillion-dollar狂欢 (carnival) continues, but the cycle's shadow remains.

链捕手4 мин. назад

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

链捕手4 мин. назад

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

The FTSE Russell preliminary list for 2026 includes several crypto-related companies like CoreWeave, Iren, Galaxy Digital, and DAT firms BitMine and Sharplink. Inclusion in the Russell 3000 index means billions in passive fund inflows will automatically buy these stocks. While this is positive for the stock prices of these Digital Asset Technology (DAT) companies, the article argues it may not directly benefit the underlying cryptocurrencies like Ethereum. DAT firms can use stock price gains to buy more crypto, but the capital doesn't flow directly to the assets. Citing David Hoffman's recent exit from ETH, the piece notes a structural issue: Ethereum's value as a public good ("giver, not taker") and the profit capture by L2s and applications mean only a small portion of ecosystem success translates to ETH's price. Despite BitMine buying millions of ETH during its price decline, Ethereum's value has fallen significantly. The conclusion is that while index inclusion marks traditional finance acceptance, the "ETH as money" narrative is fading. New value narratives for native tokens are needed, as current mechanisms like chain revenue and buybacks may have inherent limits.

marsbit46 мин. назад

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

marsbit46 мин. назад

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

Summary: Evidence emerges that OpenAI's GPT-5.5 may be "silently" switching to a less capable model during use. Users report that after roughly two hours, the GPT-5.5 Extended Thinking model begins responding instantly with significantly degraded output quality, while the interface continues to display the premium model's label. Complaints on developer forums describe a loss of instruction-following ability and poor code quality, with even the highest "xhigh" tier affected. This is corroborated by an OpenAI help document stating that after Plus users exceed 160 messages per 3 hours, the system "silently" switches to a "mini" model without any user notification. Pro users also report "heavy thinking" modes being throttled during high server loads. Trace commands from earlier incidents have shown users requesting GPT-5.3 Codex but receiving GPT-5.2 outputs. OpenAI acknowledged performance degradation in mid-May, marking it resolved, but user reports surged again in late May. The pattern mirrors past controversies with GPT-5, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 releases, where each update was followed by user complaints of reduced capability. The article suggests cost-cutting on compute may be a factor, noting that while GPT-5.5 users struggle, GPT-5.6 is already being tested internally.

marsbit46 мин. назад

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

marsbit46 мин. назад

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit1 ч. назад

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ELON (ELON) представлены ниже.

Топ вопросы

Что такое монета Dogelon (ELON) и каково ее происхождение?2025/04/15 02:47

Elon Musk’s SpaceX moves Bitcoin — First major on-chain activity since July

Key Takeaways

What did SpaceX do with its Bitcoin holdings?

Did the move affect Bitcoin’s price?

SpaceX’s Bitcoin portfolio

Market response

Похожее

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

Торговля

Популярные статьи

Как купить ELON

Обсуждения

Топ вопросы

Популярные категории

Популярные теги