P 小将们,做好迎接新战场的准备了吗?

深潮Опубликовано 2025-08-24Обновлено 2025-08-25

投机总是流向任何能够维持叙事速度的东西。

撰文:@MiyaHedge

编译:AididiaoJP,Foresight News

Launchcoin 创始人 Ben Pasternak,只要提到这个名字,整个加密推特都会患上创伤后应激障碍。一个市值 4000 万美元的代币却能占据如此高的心智份额,这告诉我一件事:代币化初创企业已经站稳脚跟,而且加密推特的每个人都非常希望这个概念能成功。

我曾概述了模因币是如何慢慢消亡的,自那以后,发生了很多事情;我们来快速回顾一下:

BonkFun 迅速消亡,正如预测的那样

PumpFun 重新赢得了市场份额,正如预测的那样

Heaven 出现,占据了模因币市场 14% 的份额

模因币市场的整体活动?在 8 月 17 日创下新低,每日活跃地址数仅为 12.4 万。你或许与我的观点不同,但数字不会说谎:模因币市场正在消亡。

但不会消亡的是代际之间向赌博、向金融虚无主义、向承担重大风险以获取不对称回报的转移。我们正处于超级赌博的时代。这正是为什么代币化在加密推特上从未真正兴起。如果你可以赌 CHILLHOUSE(预计 5 天内涨 10 倍),谁还会想去赌 Solana 上的苹果公司呢?代币化仍然是本轮周期中最大的传统金融主题,并且一年来一直如此。

RWA 虽然对社会很重要,但在加密领域内部从未引起过巨大的资本兴趣,但这一切在 Ben Pasternak 出现后开始改变。

我们正处于模因币时代的尾声和 ICM(Initial Coin Offerings,指代币化初创企业或相关概念)时代开端的某个阶段

尽管我们都喜欢嘲讽 Ben Pasternak,但我认为他在某种程度上是一位有远见的人。

初创企业 + 加密 Degen 文化是天作之合。

你第一次能够赌上真正的、由 T1 级硅谷风投支持创始人,而 Believe 为其创建了数字版的创业投资真人秀。大多数都是前提和愿景,实际的执行在节奏和框架上都存在不足。现在 LAUNCHCOIN 从高点下跌了 -87%,Ben Pasternak 成了整个加密推特的笑柄。

那么 ICM 现在死了吗?数字创业投资真人秀一直是个笑话,一个坏主意吗?

我认为不是。

投机总是流向任何能够维持叙事速度的东西。

  • 在 1980 年代,是低价股。

  • 在 2000 年代,是小盘股 IPO。

  • 在 2020 年代,是狗狗币。

现在?是代币化初创企业。

为什么?因为它们正好处于每个利益相关者都想要的交汇点:

  • 初创企业需要资金 + 分发渠道(distribution)。

  • 投资者希望获得对早期创新的流动性敞口。

  • 加密领域需要持续的新代币流入以维持周期。

私募股权的背景

2025 年全球私募股权是一个 13 万亿美元的市场,预计到 2030 年将达到 12-19 万亿美元。

目前它是封闭的:最低投资额 100 万美元,5-10 年的锁定期,不透明的报告,数万亿美元集中在 Blackstone、KKR、Apollo 等巨头手中。

因此,我们有数万亿美元的私人资产被锁住,而加密市场的零售端则渴望获得非空壳的新资产。这种不匹配就是套利机会。

我们还有年轻且渴望脱颖而出的创始人。下一代的创始人是长期在线、精通吸引注意力的高手。当 AGI 越来越近时,唯一能产生收入的就是以最有效的方式将你的“外壳”货币化的能力。技术将不再重要,这将变成一场游戏,看谁能以最好的方式推广他们的产品来聚集大量客户群。

这些 Z 世代的创始人精通模因语法,从青春期起就受训于驾驭算法推荐流。他们不仅仅是“创始人”,他们是文化运营者。实际的代码库可以被分叉、外包、由 AI 自动生成,但将其包装成一个病毒式叙事,迫使数百万人点击、分享并最终付费,这才是稀缺的技能。他们通过创建一个代币来武器化网络效应和注意力最大化,这个代币会自动吸引数百万用户使用他们的产品。这就是为什么代币化初创企业比未代币化的更具优势。

看看 Murad 的 SPX 游戏计划。“每天向一个人推广这个币以增加持有者数量”。对于 Believe 来说,你应该被激励去推广初创公司以增加其用户数量,如果开发团队围绕其代币做了正确的设计,也应该使代币持有者共同受益。这种用户飞轮对于代币化初创企业至关重要。

这完全符合当下的时代精神:他们推销的不是产品,而是一个附带着股票代码的实时叙事。创始人可以从第一天起就将他们注意力最大化的技能引导到一个可交易的对象上。每一条推文、每一次病毒式营销、每一个市场周期都直接转化为流动性。

代币化初创企业是不可避免的,因为它们满足了等式每一方的需求。

现在请不要误会:这不是为 LAUNCHCOIN 做推广,我认为 Believe 搞砸了,他们推出了一个只完成了 1/10 的产品,框架糟糕,并且像推广模因币一样推广这些代币,而你真正应该做的是将它们设计得尽可能接近证券。

ICM 如此火爆,但没人愿意持有一个代币超过 30 秒,这两者是相互排斥的。

我不知道这种叙事转变需要两个月还是两年才能展开。我这个月投入了六位数的资金,用于创建一个法律框架,允许初创企业进行代币化,同时不被认定为证券 。据我所知,至少有其他 5 个团队在做同样的事情。有一些人在暗处,在大型律师事务所的支持下,已经构建代币化股权法律框架近一年了。

我不知道这何时会发生,但过程会如下:

  • 通过非证券模式进行代币化初创企业

  • 中小市值估值公司通过证券模式在 IPO 前进行代币化

  • 大型(10 亿美元以上)私营公司通过证券模式进行代币化

而你需要参与其中。

私募股权是加密领域尚未敢触及的最大未开发市场。

它简直完美契合加密文化。

类赌博性质,没有过度金融化,大量新公司涌入。

代币化初创企业将标志着代币化私募股权的开始,并将成为堕落者超级赌博、输光积蓄的新赌场。

Похожее

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit6 мин. назад

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit6 мин. назад

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手16 мин. назад

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手16 мин. назад

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit42 мин. назад

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit42 мин. назад

US Debt Exceeds $39 Trillion, Surpassing GDP for First Time: The 'Gray Rhino' Every Investor Must Face by 2026

The U.S. national debt has exceeded $39 trillion, with the debt-to-GDP ratio surpassing 100% in 2026 for the first time since WWII. The annual interest payment is projected to reach $1.039 trillion. Driven by structural factors like tax cuts, rising entitlement spending (Social Security, Medicare), and compounding interest, the deficit persists. The Congressional Budget Office warns the current fiscal path is unsustainable, projecting debt could reach 175% of GDP by 2056. While the U.S. is unlikely to default as it issues its own currency, the consequences include persistent inflation pressure, higher long-term interest rates (e.g., 30-year Treasury yields at 5.2%), and potential crowding out of private investment. A fiscal crisis could manifest as a sudden, sharp spike in borrowing costs if market confidence erodes. Major credit rating agencies have downgraded U.S. debt, reflecting these concerns. For investors, this signals the end of the era of permanently low interest rates. Equity investors should favor companies with strong current earnings over high-growth stocks reliant on low discount rates. Bond investors face headwinds for long-term Treasuries due to increased supply, making shorter-duration bonds and investment-grade corporates relatively attractive. Gold and real assets can provide a hedge against currency debasement risks. Three broad scenarios are possible: gradual stabilization through fiscal reform (unlikely given political gridlock), a slow-burn of high debt and interest rates dragging on growth (the most probable baseline), or a sudden loss of market confidence triggering a crisis. Key indicators to watch include CBO report updates, Treasury auction demand, and the 30-year Treasury yield. The core takeaway for investors is the need to adjust portfolios for a world of sustained higher government borrowing costs and interest rates.

marsbit1 ч. назад

US Debt Exceeds $39 Trillion, Surpassing GDP for First Time: The 'Gray Rhino' Every Investor Must Face by 2026

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片