USDC v. USDT – Is this stablecoin nearing its ‘Circle’ of life?

AmbcryptoОпубликовано 2022-06-21Обновлено 2022-06-21

Введение

Tether (USDT) has been the dominant force in stablecoins for a few years now. However, Tether’s closest rival, Circle’s USD Coin (USDC), might be the one making headlines today.

The stablecoin market, like the rest of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, continues to see new updates every day. Things changed rapidly, especially after TerraUSD [UST] came into the picture only to crash and burn. Now, while some struggled to move on past the de-pegging event, others might have found a solid ground to stand on

Tether (USDT) has been the dominant force in stablecoins for a few years now. However, Tether’s closest rival, Circle’s USD Coin (USDC), might be the one making headlines today.

Circle of ‘stable’ life

Around five months ago, USDC surpassed a milestone of 50 billion USDC in circulation. Despite the achievement, USDT maintained a significant gap over the rest of its competitors. Mostly on the front of market capitalization and the number of daily transactions on the Ethereum [ETH] blockchain. Now, this gap may have taken a big hit.

Circle’s USD Coin (USDC) stablecoin has FINALLY crossed Tether’s USDT by the number of daily transactions on the Ethereum blockchain. Alex Svanevik, CEO of on-chain data hub Nansen, shared this milestone on Twitter too.

Source: Nansen

Circle’s dollar-pegged stablecoin is yet to flip USDT by market cap. The two cryptocurrencies are currently valued at $67.8 billion and $55.5 billion, respectively. But, Tether might lose its footing or even the battle, given the headwinds. On the other hand, amidst this chaos, USDC found interest from investors in the market.

Terra’sUSD de-pegging and eventual collapse sent shockwaves across the crypto-market. Major stablecoins such as Tether [USDT] and USD Coin [USDC], and DAI saw major changes. USDT, in fact, still hasn’t achieved the $1-peg as it circled around the $0.99-mark at press time.

To make matters worse, Tether’s Chief Technical Officer Paolo Ardoino confirmed the incidence of a DDoS attack. Here, Tether received 8M reqs/5 minutes as opposed to the usual 2k reqs/5 min.

On the contrary, USDC, at press time, maintained its $1 peg on CoinMarketCap. In fact, USDC is the most-used stablecoin of all when it comes to transferring volume, holding a share of 51.5% on this front.

Tether and DAI only have shares of 25% and 11.4%, respectively.

Source: Dune Analytics

This marks an unprecedented hike for USDC, despite the chaos within the market.

Game, Set, Match?

Well, not really. Tether (USDT) isn’t giving up just yet.USDT remains the top player in the stablecoin market. That being said, regulatory scars are a cause of alarm.

Tether has been at the receiving end of severe backlash because of its “backing.” It has faced several lawsuits over the past couple of years. As a result, the firm’s efforts to provide transparency have failed to derail the bad press surrounding it.

On the other hand, Circle, the regulated crypto-focused financial service firm behind the dollar-pegged stablecoin, hasn’t faced such regulatory hurdles. Only time will tell how this competition will go.

Похожее

The Real Battlefield of AI Lies in the 'Dark Forest'

The article "AI's Real Battlefield is in the 'Dark Forest'" discusses the shifting dynamics in the global AI landscape, contrasting the strategic directions of Chinese and U.S. AI developers. Chinese companies like Alibaba (with its "HappyHorse" video model), ByteDance (Seedance 2.0), and Kuaishou (Kling 3.0) have taken the lead in text-to-video generation, surpassing OpenAI’s now-discontinued Sora. These models are deeply integrated into their parent companies’ content ecosystems (e.g., Douyin, Kuaishou), serving to reduce content creation costs and enhance user engagement rather than operating as standalone profit centers. In contrast, U.S. firms are pivoting toward high-stakes enterprise and security applications. Anthropic’s Claude Mythos model demonstrates advanced capabilities in autonomously discovering and exploiting software vulnerabilities, prompting concern at the highest levels of U.S. financial and governmental institutions. OpenAI responded with its own GPT-5.4-Cyber, signaling a strategic shift from consumer-facing products to enterprise-grade tools focused on cybersecurity and programming. The divergence is attributed to fundamental differences in resources and market structures. U.S. companies, backed by vast computational resources (e.g., Amazon and Google supply Anthropic with substantial funding and TPU access), can pursue deep, specialized R&D in high-value B2B sectors. Chinese firms, facing significant compute power constraints and a less mature enterprise SaaS market, have found success by leveraging their massive consumer platforms and optimizing for cost-efficiency. The article warns that the AI race is entering a "dark forest" phase—a reference to competitive dynamics where cybersecurity capabilities could determine digital sovereignty. While Chinese models like Zhipu AI’s GLM-5.1 show promise in narrowing the gap in coding proficiency, the author stresses that achieving parity in security-critical AI will require asymmetric strategies, including greater investment in coding models, adaptation to domestic hardware, and exploring international markets in the Global South.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Real Battlefield of AI Lies in the 'Dark Forest'

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片