Bitdeer Eyes US Manufacturing as Crypto Mining Faces Tariff Pressure

ccn.comОпубликовано 2025-04-15Обновлено 2025-04-15

Key Takeaways

  • Singapore-based Bitdeer pivots to self-mining amid falling demand for Bitcoin rigs.
  • Ongoing tariff tensions are prompting miners to manufacture and operate within the U.S.
  • Industry experts say the shift could help decentralize global Bitcoin mining power.

Bitdeer Technologies Group, a Singapore-based Bitcoin (BTC) mining firm listed on Nasdaq, is shifting its focus to the United States in response to intensifying global tariff tensions and declining demand for mining equipment.

The company said it plans to ramp up both its self-mining operations and domestic manufacturing efforts in the U.S., where more firms are now opting to build and mine rather than import equipment from traditional hubs like China.

Pivot From Sales to Self-Mining

The move comes as the market for Bitcoin mining rigs continues to cool, prompting a strategic pivot at Bitdeer. Rather than selling equipment to third-party miners, the company will focus on mining BTC for itself.

“Our plan going forward is to prioritize our self-mining,” said Jeff LaBerge, head of capital markets and strategic initiatives at Bitdeer, in comments to Bloomberg.

Bitcoin’s recent market dip—dropping nearly 30% from its all-time highs—has deeply cut into mining profitability. The April 2024 halving event reduced block rewards to 3.125 BTC, adding further pressure on already thin margins.

The combination of lower profitability and equipment oversupply has made selling rigs less attractive, pushing more companies to mine independently.

Tariffs Push Manufacturing to U.S. Soil

Beyond price pressures, geopolitics are playing a growing role. Donald Trump’s administration has leveled tariffs on tech equipment imported from China, where most Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) miners are produced.

In response, many Bitcoin mining firms are relocating or expanding their manufacturing base to the U.S. and other countries to reduce exposure to supply chain disruptions and rising costs.

Bitdeer’s decision to localize production is part of a broader effort to mitigate these risks. The company expects to begin U.S.-based manufacturing in the second half of 2025.

Last year, China-based Bitmain Technologies, the world’s largest maker of Bitcoin mining hardware, also announced plans to open a U.S. production line, though details remain scarce.

A Step Toward Decentralization?

While the U.S. already controls more than half of the global Bitcoin network’s hash rate, industry observers say that increased domestic production could lead to a more even global distribution of mining power over time.

Experts argue that tariff pressures may inadvertently drive decentralization—one of Bitcoin’s foundational principles—by encouraging diverse geographic sourcing and manufacturing of mining infrastructure.

As the crypto mining industry evolves amid tighter margins and geopolitical constraints, Bitdeer’s strategy signals a growing trend: survival will increasingly depend on vertical integration, self-reliance and manufacturing closer to home.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Похожее

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

Airwallex's founder, Jack Zhang, outlines the three primary paths in the global payments industry and explains why the company chooses the most demanding one: building its own global financial infrastructure. The article begins by highlighting a common industry problem: payment platforms appear homogenized on the surface, offering similar features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts. However, their underlying capabilities differ vastly. Customers truly care about payment stability, compliance robustness, and reliable market entry support. Zhang identifies three strategic paths: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Systems (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency via stablecoins and blockchain settlement but struggles with mainstream adoption, significant regulatory friction, and a lack of competitive edge against established players, often leaving it with niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a modern interface over legacy banking and partner networks. While enabling fast expansion, it fails to solve core issues like dependency on correspondent banks and intermediary risk, merely postponing the need for solid foundations. 3. **Building Own Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex, Ant International, and others. It involves obtaining local licenses, establishing direct regulatory relationships, building local teams, and controlling the full technology stack. This "heavy" approach is slow and capital-intensive but aims to internalize complexity, providing customers with a "lighter" experience. The core argument is that for business clients, the highest cost isn't transaction fees but hidden risks like frozen accounts, payment delays, and regulatory shocks. By investing heavily in its own infrastructure, Airwallex seeks to absorb these complexities, offering customers greater stability, cost savings (beyond fees), and long-term certainty. This foundational investment, though initially slow, enables compound growth, as evidenced by Airwallex's accelerated revenue scaling. In conclusion, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—owning the underlying infrastructure—creates durable value for customers and sustainable advantage for the payment provider.

marsbit3 ч. назад

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

marsbit3 ч. назад

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

The article discusses Airwallex's approach to global payments, highlighting the key challenges and different strategic paths in the industry. It begins by addressing common user questions about platform reliability, cryptocurrency payments, and the necessity of Airwallex's "heavy" infrastructure model. The core argument is that while many payment platforms appear similar on the surface—offering features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts—their underlying capabilities differ drastically. The piece identifies three primary paths for global payment providers: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Infrastructure (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency through stablecoins and on-chain settlements but faces significant regulatory hurdles and offers little advantage over established players for mainstream use, often serving only niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Aggregating/Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a better user experience over legacy banking and partner networks. While fast to market, this approach does not solve fundamental issues like dependency on intermediaries, correspondent banking risks, and compliance fragility. 3. **Building Proprietary Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex and similar firms. This involves obtaining local licenses, building direct regulatory relationships, establishing local teams, and controlling the compliance and technology stack. This is the most difficult and capital-intensive route but aims to internalize complexity. Airwallex's strategy of "heavy" investment in its own infrastructure is framed not as inefficiency, but as a long-term bet to provide clients with greater stability, cost savings beyond fees, and certainty. The platform's "heaviness" absorbs risk and operational complexity, aiming to deliver a "lighter" experience for business customers. The article concludes that in global payments, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—the underlying infrastructure—is what creates durable value for clients and sustainable competitive advantage.

链捕手3 ч. назад

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

链捕手3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片