KiloEx Hacked: Exchange Shuts Down After $7.5 Million Stolen

TheCryptoTimesОпубликовано 2025-04-15Обновлено 2025-04-15

KiloEx, a decentralized platform for derivatives trading, has temporarily shut down after getting hit by a serious security breach. Hackers exploited the protocol’s vaults, draining around $7.5 million. 

The team says they’re now working closely with blockchain networks and top cybersecurity experts to track down the attacker and recover the stolen funds.

In a statement shared on social media, the KiloEx team confirmed the incident and said that the attacker’s wallet address is 0x00faC92881556A90FdB19eAe9F23640B95B4bcBd. 

They’ve urged all partner platforms and protocols to blacklist this address immediately to prevent any further transactions.

Following the breach, KiloEx halted platform activity and began collaborating with several ecosystem partners, including BNB Chain, Manta Network, and security firms like Seal-911, SlowMist, and Sherlock. 

They’re teaming up to track the stolen funds, which are now being funneled through zkBridge and Meson — both used for moving assets across blockchains.

Looks like the attacker’s been busy, shifting the money across multiple networks like BNB Chain, opBNB, Base, Taiko, Bsquared, and Manta. A second wallet associated with the attacker on Manta Network was also shared: 0x551f3110f12c763D1611d5A63B5F015d1c1a954C.

The KiloEx team is now trying to urgently engage with zkBridge and Meson in hopes of freezing any ongoing transfers. They’ve also called on the broader Web3 community to assist in making contact with these protocols and preventing further damage.

A bounty program is being prepared to incentivize help in recovering the stolen assets. Meanwhile, a full post-mortem report is expected soon, which will detail how the attack happened, what assets were affected, and what steps are being taken to fix things.

KiloEx has promised to keep its community updated as more details emerge.

Also Read: zkLend Hacker Loses $5.4M in Phishing Attack While Using Tornado Cash



Похожее

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit1 ч. назад

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手1 ч. назад

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片