75.8% Of Shiba Inu Investors HODLing Since 1+ Year: How Do Bitcoin & Co Compare?

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2025-03-22Обновлено 2025-03-23

Введение

On-chain data shows Shiba Inu has more than 75% of its holders dormant since more than a year ago. Here's...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

On-chain data shows Shiba Inu has more than 75% of its holders dormant since more than a year ago. Here’s how Bitcoin and other coins compare.

Shiba Inu Compared Against Other Digital Assets In Long-Term Holders

In a new post on X, the market intelligence platform IntoTheBlock has discussed about how the various top coins in the cryptocurrency sector compare in terms of the percentage of long-term holders.

The analytics firm defines the “long-term holders” (LTHs) as the investors who have been holding onto their tokens since more than one year ago.

Statistically, the longer a holder keeps their coins dormant, the less likely they become to sell said coins. As such, the LTHs with their significant holding time would represent the side of the sector that’s the least likely to sell.

In other words, the supply held by these investors can be considered to essentially be frozen. Here is the chart shared by IntoTheBlock, that shows how this supply compares between the different top assets by market cap:

Shiba Inu Long-Term Holders

Looks like two coins have edged Shiba Inu out on this list | Source: IntoTheBlock on X

As displayed in the above graph, Litecoin (LTC) has topped the list in terms of this metric, with around 77.7% of its entire supply being locked in the wallets of the diamond hands. Chainlink (LINK) isn’t too far behind, with the indicator sitting at 77.5% for it.

The memecoin Shiba Inu (SHIB) also has a respectful value of the metric, with over three-quarters of its supply being in the control of the LTHs. Despite being the two largest assets by market cap, Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC) have lagged behind in the indicator, with it standing at 74.2% and 73.3%, respectively.

As mentioned before, the LTHs are resolute entities who are unlikely to part with their coins. As such, the stronger the dominance of this cohort, the stronger should be the theoretical supply crunch on any cryptocurrency.

Recently, the various coins in the sector have gone through a bull run followed by a crash, which is the type of volatility that can induce some selling from even the HODLers. The bull rally, especially, is probable to have forced some of these investors into taking their hard-earned profits.

Thus, the LTHs being this dominant for Shiba Inu and others despite all the volatility would suggest conviction is still strong around these assets.

SHIB Price

Shiba Inu, much like most of the cryptocurrency sector, has been unable to find any momentum to sustain a recovery run, as its price has only been sliding lower. At present, SHIB is trading around $0.0000125.

Below is a chart that shows how the memecoin’s trajectory has looked over the last three months.

Shiba Inu Price Chart

Shiba Inu appears to have been riding a downtrend since a while now | Source: SHIBUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Shutterstock.com, IntoTheBlock.com, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Keshav is a Physics graduate who has been employed as a writer with Bitcoinist since June 2021. He is passionate about writing and through the years, he has gained experience working in a variety of niches. Keshav holds an active interest in the cryptocurrency market, with on-chain analysis being an area he particularly likes to research and write about.

Похожее

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手1 ч. назад

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit1 ч. назад

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit1 ч. назад

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片