加密钱包 Exodus 捐赠了 130 万美元,帮助“动员”美国加密选民

tokeninsight_newsОпубликовано 2024-09-25Обновлено 2024-09-25

据 Cointelegraph 报道,加密钱包供应商 Exodus 向一个政治行动委员会的捐款旨在“帮助支持其在全国范围内教育和动员加密选民的使命”。

Exodus 宣布向“与加密同行联盟”(Stand With Crypto Alliance)捐赠 130 万美元,以争取更多美国选民对该行业的政治支持。

Exodus 是一家成立于 2015 年的公司,背后有着广受欢迎的加密钱包。该公司于 9 月 24 日宣布了这一捐款,目的是“帮助支持他们在全国范围内教育和动员加密选民的使命”。

“与加密同行联盟”自 5 月以来启动了这一政治行动委员会(PAC),声称美国有 5200 万加密货币持有者,他们努力通过教育和政治意识来赋权,以备 11 月 5 日的美国总统选举。

该非营利组织在其网站上还声称,已从 149 万名加密倡导者那里筹集了 1.8 亿美元的捐款。然而,联邦选举委员会报告称,截至 6 月 30 日,仅有 13,690 美元直接流入该 PAC。

该组织还专注于倡导加密法规,包括推动“21 世纪金融创新与技术法”(FIT21)的通过,该法案在国会获得了两党的支持。

该组织于 2023 年 5 月由 Coinbase 成立,拥有超过 1000 名政治家的数据库,并根据他们对加密行业支持的程度进行评分。

他们于 9 月 25 日更新了政治家评分卡,并现在要求候选人提供“额外的明确性”以符合评分要求。

加密选民可能在决定 11 月选举结果中发挥关键作用。上个月,前乔·拜登竞选者约翰·安扎隆表示,加密“可能是一个非常重要的摇摆群体”。

“我不在乎你是民主党人还是共和党人——作为候选人,你应该与这个群体对话,”他当时说道,并补充道,“这个群体现在正在增强力量,拥有权力和声音,这变得非常重要。”

民主党候选人副总统卡马拉·哈里斯与共和党候选人前总统唐纳德·特朗普之间的竞选形势十分接近。

根据加密预测平台 Polymarket,哈里斯以 50% 的支持率微弱领先于特朗普的 48%。

特朗普已多次表示支持加密行业,甚至用比特币购买汉堡。

与此同时,哈里斯最近才暗示她将支持创新并为数字资产引入明确的监管。

Похожее

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手1 ч. назад

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit1 ч. назад

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit1 ч. назад

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片