交易量增长 86%,香港如何成为东亚 Crypto 市场领头羊?

比推Опубликовано 2024-09-19Обновлено 2024-09-19

香港的数字货币采用率在国际上排名第 30 位,这表明其具有成为主要参与者的潜力。

来源:bitcoinist

编译:区块链骑士

香港的 Crypto 资产交易量同比增长 86%,令人印象深刻。Chainalysis 报告称,香港的 Crypto 资产采用率在东亚地区遥遥领先。

该地区的数字货币采用率在国际上排名第 30 位,这表明其具有成为主要参与者的潜力

推动这一惊人增长的因素有几个。首先,香港的监管环境独一无二。例如,与实施严格监管的中国大陆相比,香港对 Crypto 资产采取了更加温和的态度。

这种适应性促进了金融创新,吸引了希望增强 Crypto 资产投资组合的机构和个人投资者的关注

在市场上获得的总价值主要来自中心化交易所,约占东亚地区获得的总价值的 64%。

这种模式表明,投资者使用这些中心化平台来满足他们的交易需求

在东亚,Crypto 资产的格局存在着深刻的分歧。中央交易平台仍是最受欢迎的平台,占据了市场价值的 65%。

这些平台的便利性和可靠性让散户交易者趋之若鹜,但在这背后却隐藏着一个不为人知的真相——越来越多的机构玩家正在远离这些中心化的平台

去中心化交易所(DEXes)和去中心化金融平台在机构投资者中越来越受欢迎,尽管普通交易者更喜欢中心化交易所。

这一变化表明,规模较大的参与者正在寻找能够利用市场低效的各种投资方法,而去中心化市场通常就是这种情况。

在东亚,近年来 Crypto 资产的使用大幅增加。2023 年 7 月至 2024 年 6 月期间,该地区的 Crypto 资产交易额约占 Crypto 资产交易总额的 9%。

在此期间,区块链上执行的交易额超过 4000 亿美元。

在研究期间,韩国的 Crypto 资产价值约为 1300 亿美元,在东亚地区保持首位。

虽然香港发展迅速,但在不久的将来仍将面临重大挑战

SEC(美国证券交易委员会)最近批准了以太坊 ETF,这打破了香港相对于全球其他 Crypto 资产目的地的一些竞争优势。

Crypto 资产投资将吸引更多来自其他金融中心的关注,香港必须不断创新,才能继续成为顶级数字货币目的地的关注焦点

尽管前景广阔,但 Crypto 资产在香港的发展前景仍是未知数。虽然巩固了在东亚的主导地位,但该地区不得不就不断变化的国内和离岸政策进行谈判。

投资者正热切地关注着金融区的反应,以及它能否保持稳定的增长速度。支持性的管制环境和对该地区及周边地区日益浓厚的机构兴趣,有助于该地区的进一步发展

然而,如果要保持优势,国内政策和国外竞争带来的新问题将需要创新的理念和更清晰的法律。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Похожее

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

**Summary:** The article argues that ordinary investors feeling FOMO over missing the AI investment boom lack not timing, but their own independent worldview. Most people chase "what to buy" based on others' opinions (FOMO, envy) rather than fundamental analysis. This leads to costly mistakes: not knowing when to exit winning trades or cut losses on losing ones. The core solution is to develop a personal, long-term (5-10 year) worldview about societal shifts and technological bottlenecks. For most, building this from scratch (Path A) is too demanding. A practical alternative (Path B) is to follow the **capital expenditures (capex)** and strategic investments of visionary leaders, as their money reveals true conviction more reliably than their words. Five key figures to track for different AI perspectives are highlighted: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA, infrastructure), Elon Musk (Tesla/SpaceX/xAI, capex signals), Sam Altman (OpenAI, commercialization, but beware hype), Dario Amodei (Anthropic, technical/safety focus), and Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek, efficiency/anti-consensus view). The article details how to read capex signals from hyperscalers' financial reports, NVIDIA's revenue breakdown, and strategic investments. It maps the complete AI产业链 (supply chain) from raw materials/energy to models/applications, explaining value flow and inter-dependencies (e.g., how a model release triggers demand across chips, memory, and optics). Finally, it provides an action plan: secure personal finances first, allocate a limited portfolio percentage (max 25%) to the theme, prefer broad ETFs (like QQQ), use dollar-cost averaging over 6-12 months, and write down strict investment rules beforehand to combat emotional errors during market volatility. The conclusion is that a stable, personally-held worldview enables disciplined, long-term investment far more than chasing short-term trends.

marsbit9 мин. назад

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

marsbit9 мин. назад

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbit28 мин. назад

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbit28 мин. назад

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 ч. назад

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片