加密货币市场市值上涨,为什么大多数币还是表现不佳?

coinvoiceОпубликовано 2024-09-19Обновлено 2024-09-19

撰文:@ysiu

翻译:白话区块链

加密市场总体上同比增长超过 2 万亿美元,而另类币集体上涨了 70%。那么,为什么许多近期推出的项目表现不佳呢?主要原因是注意力稀释,因为 2024 年推出了数百万种新 Token。

@pumpdotfun 单独负责了超过 200 万种 Memecoin 的推出,这极大地稀释了整体注意力。对于网络来说,机构参与变得比以往任何时候都更加关键,这一点在比特币 ETF 推出时得到了最好的体现。

Token 上市的增加是否表明现在注重数量而不是质量?

用户可能会对选择感到不知所措,从而导致 Coinbase 等平台上的活动减少。由于市场波动、监管问题或缺乏引人注目的用例,他们可能会感到疲劳或对新 Token 不感兴趣。

 

机构支持是 $MOCA、$SOL、$BNB 和 $TON 等 Token 表现较好的原因之一。正如 @blockchaingmg 所说,「来自 @animocabrands 的 MOCA Token 是唯一的亮点,自发行价格上涨了 51%。」

@animocabrands 现在将投资扩展到包括上市 Token,重点关注他们的投资组合。在这个竞争激烈的市场中,能吸引机构关注的 Web3 项目将更容易脱颖而出,从而部分缓解注意力稀释的问题。

各种观点已经被 @hosseeb 和其他专家详细分析,其中最受关注的原因之一是高 FDV。虽然有很多因素影响,但结论是这些问题并非根本性问题。

目前,另类币的推出速度远远超过了 Web3 网络参与者的增长,这与互联网泡沫时期的网站、留言板和聊天室的推出,或 2010-12 年间智能手机应用的推出类似。

与美国股市中约 80% 的机构参与不同,数字资产目前仅吸引了 5% 的机构资金,并且主要集中在比特币上,这意味着还有很大的增长空间。

虽然建立社区和扩展网络仍然非常重要,它们是项目产品和服务的核心,但在我看来,能吸引机构参与的项目在当前市场环境下会更具优势。
 


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

来源:白话区块链

Похожее

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbit1 мин. назад

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbit1 мин. назад

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 ч. назад

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手1 ч. назад

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

The article titled "Ethereum Becomes a Chinese Concept Stock" presents a critical analysis of Ethereum's perceived decline in market confidence and its structural parallels to Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges. It begins by noting significant sell-offs by early investors like Wanxiang and key figures like Bankless's Hoffman in 2026, despite Ethereum's strong fundamental activity. The piece questions the erosion of trust in Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that while other ecosystems have faced founder controversies, Ethereum's issues stem from its internal governance model. The author draws a direct comparison to "China concept stocks," which are Chinese businesses operating globally but reliant on foreign capital and listings. Similarly, Ethereum, funded early by Chinese capital like Wanxiang, developed a strong institutional framework from its IXO to its PoS transition. The core problem, according to the article, is a leadership vacuum regarding price and direction. Vitalik's move to make the EF smaller and less active is framed as a mistake. While he advocates for ETH as a "commodity," the ecosystem lacks a clear entity to steward its price stability, creating tension within the PoS system, as seen with Lido's challenges. The narrative suggests that excessive abstraction and a hands-off approach from the EF have left the community adrift, contrasting with more proactive foundations like Solana's. The article then examines emerging technical narratives for Ethereum: privacy (ZK-proofs), AI integration, and a refocus on Layer-1. However, it observes a shift from Ethereum leading as a "world computer" to merely adapting to trends like AI, where crypto-native projects are finding success independently of Ethereum. The piece posits that Ethereum's unique value in an increasingly fragmented world may be as a permissionless, global financial testing ground—a neutral platform amid geopolitical tensions. In conclusion, it asserts that Ethereum's fate mirrors that of China concept stocks: an asset born from one region (conceptually "A"), funded by another ("B"), and dependent on "B" for exit liquidity. While Ethereum's "golden age" may be over, and selling pressure from early backers will continue, it remains positioned as a critical linkage point in a divided global landscape, standing at a new, albeit uncertain, starting point.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片