黑客瞄准 Discord,知名 NFT 频道接连遭遇攻击

陀螺财经Опубликовано 2022-06-06Обновлено 2022-06-06

Введение

黑客升级网络钓鱼和诈骗攻击方式,利用流行的Discord机器人,欺骗用户点击恶意链接。

黑客升级网络钓鱼和诈骗攻击方式,利用流行的Discord机器人,欺骗用户点击恶意链接。

Discord是一款专为游戏玩家设计的公共聊天应用程序,已在全球加密货币所有者中流行起来,攻击者瞄准了许多知名NFT项目的Discord服务器。

Origin协议创始人JoshFraser本月早些时候在Twitter上分享了一个帖子,揭示了Discord存在的问题。

根据Fraser的说法,DiscordAPI泄露了每台服务器上每个私人频道的名称、描述、成员列表和活动数据。由于有许多备受瞩目的加密项目使用Discord,这些信息泄露可能会泄露尚未宣布的合作关系、即将推出的产品、交易所列表以及控制钱包交易的多签者。

区块链安全公司PeckShield此前曾警告用户Memeland、RTFKT、PROOF/Moonbirds和基础设施公司Cyberconnect的NFTDiscord遭到攻击破坏。

Cyberconnect和Memeland在他们的推特上证实了黑客攻击,并警告用户避免点击Discord上的任何链接。

Memeland的一名团队成员指出,Discordbot(Mee6)似乎在多个知名服务器上受到攻击。

Discord最常用的Mee6机器人被黑后导致多个NFT项目遭到攻击。Mee6是一个非常流行的Discord机器人,它可以自动执行多种功能:一些基本的审核、发送管理员消息、播放音乐等等。它被全球约1600万个Discord服务器使用。像Mee6这样的自动化Discord机器人是主要的安全隐患,它们的消息通常受到社区用户的信任。如果Discord机器人遭到入侵并且攻击消息设计得足够好,整个Discord的用户将被钓鱼,下载恶意软件或支付某些欺诈骗局。

由于有许多备受瞩目的加密项目使用Discord,这种信息泄露可能会揭示“尚未宣布的合作伙伴关系、即将推出的产品、交易所列表以及协调多重签名者”。

被入侵的Discord机器人可能会造成毁灭性的后果,黑客可以发布一个伪装成自动机器人的恶意链接并引诱用户打开它,一次错误的点击可能会对个人资产造成不可逆转的损害,并劫持的Discord服务器可以对大量用户构成威胁。

最近几个月,针对NFTDiscord频道的一连串攻击仍在继续。6月5号BAYCDiscord再次遭攻击,价值约200ETH的NFT被盗,在此之前BAYC的Discord服务器已遭受过攻击,BAYC联合创始人GordonGoner在个人社交媒体上发文称,Discord不适用于Web3社区。我们需要一个更好的,将安全放在首位的平台。

除此之外Nyoki、Shamanz、Doodles和KaijuKingz的Discord在4月遭到入侵,OpenSea的Discordzhan账户在5月也遭到过黑客攻击。

尽管目前NFT市场有所降温,但对其的攻击却不断增加。人们对漏洞开放的疏忽和黑客对钱包持有人的创造性钓鱼,使其成为网络犯罪的最热门领域之一。

几乎每个加密项目的Discord服务器都充满了虚假账户,向服务器中的用户发送带有网络钓鱼链接的私聊信息。如果你没有将Discord账户设置为仅接收来自联系人的私聊,收到私聊不会有警告弹出,告诉你信息来自你不认识的人并存在相关风险。

除了利用Discord自带的功能外,Discord诈骗通常还涉及“投资心理学”。在针对BAYC服务器的黑客事件中,黑客接管了管理员账户,并在YouTube上发布了一个假的NFT空投链接,欺骗渴望提前进入新系列的投资者放弃对其钱包的控制。

区块链安全公司Immunefi首席执行官MitchellAmador表示,针对Discord频道和频道内用户的黑客正在变得非常有组织,这是Discord还没有准备好应对的事情。

Discord在建立时并没有考虑到安全通信,也没有考虑到彻底的隐私。归根结底在于Discord并不是作为加密货币或NFT项目的交流平台而设计的。尽管如此,Discord仍然可以做出很多改进,以安抚加密世界。

加密货币或NFT潜在攻击链中的任何人都必须像政府机构一样受到高度安全的保护。加密货币和NFT与游戏是不同的,对攻击者极具吸引力,当攻击者发现加密货币或NFT的漏洞时,几乎总是直接导致价值盗窃,而受害者基本无法挽回损失。区块链的去中心化是双向的,有时它并不站在好人一边。

可以肯定的是,如果Discord还不做出改变,加密世界的用户最终会从Discord转移到其他地方。

Похожее

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous economic participants, but they face critical gaps in identity, payment, and trust infrastructure. They currently lack standardized ways to prove who they are, what they are authorized to do, and how they should be compensated across different environments. Blockchain technology is emerging as a solution to these challenges by providing a neutral coordination layer. Public ledgers offer auditable credentials, wallets enable portable identities, and stablecoins serve as a programmable settlement layer. A key bottleneck is the absence of a universal identity standard for non-human entities—akin to "Know Your Agent" (KYA)—which would allow Agents to operate with verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials. Without this, Agents remain fragmented and face barriers to interoperability. Additionally, as AI systems take on governance roles, there is a risk that centralized control over models could undermine decentralized governance in practice. Cryptographic guarantees on training data, prompts, and behavior logs are essential to ensure Agents act in users' interests. Stablecoins and crypto-native payment rails are becoming the default for Agent-to-Agent commerce, enabling seamless, low-cost transactions for AI-native services. These systems support permissionless, programmable payments without traditional merchant onboarding. Finally, as AI scales, human oversight becomes impractical. Trust must be built into system architecture through verifiable provenance, on-chain attestations, and decentralized identity systems. The future of Agent economies depends on cryptographically enforced accountability, allowing users to delegate tasks with clearly defined constraints and transparent operation logs.

marsbit3 мин. назад

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

marsbit3 мин. назад

Six Years Since DeFi Summer, How Will the Decentralized Financial Revolution Continue?

In 2026, the DeFi sector faces a severe trust crisis following a series of high-profile security breaches, including a $292 million theft from KelpDAO’s rsETH, a $2.85 million exploit at Drift Protocol due to permission vulnerabilities, and a $14.9 million lending failure at Venus Protocol. These incidents triggered a withdrawal of approximately $10 billion from DeFi over a single weekend, highlighting systemic risks beyond smart contract flaws—such as governance, cross-chain complexity, and operational weaknesses. Despite these challenges, on-chain finance continues to grow, with capital shifting toward safer, regulated products. Stablecoins like USDT ($185B) and USDC ($78B) have reached a combined market cap of $263 billion, while tokenized U.S. Treasuries surged to $10.93 billion. Visa’s growing USDC settlement volume, now annualized at $3.5 billion, signals increasing institutional adoption of compliant blockchain-based financial infrastructure. The competition for the future of on-chain finance is intensifying. While native DeFi struggles with trust and capital outflows, regulated products—stablecoins, tokenized assets, and ETFs—are gaining dominance by offering programmable, 24/7 settlement without high DeFi risks. Over 80 crypto projects shut down in Q1 2026, reflecting dwindling patience for speculative ventures. The core challenge for open DeFi is to rebuild trust and demonstrate irreplaceable value—or risk ceding its role as the primary entry point to on-chain finance.

marsbit13 мин. назад

Six Years Since DeFi Summer, How Will the Decentralized Financial Revolution Continue?

marsbit13 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片