数据解析15个Whales Market上的项目积分价值:哪些值得参与?如何结算?

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2024-03-26Обновлено 2024-03-26

Введение

一文玩转Whales Market:如何计算价值?双押机制是否有安全问题?如何结算非线性兑换的积分?

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

数据解析15个Whales Market上的项目积分价值:哪些值得参与?如何结算?

随着 Blast 引发了积分制热潮,现市面上的绝大多数未发币项目均设立了积分制度,作为用户的未来奖励凭证。而 Whales Market 凭借积分交易市场快速崛起,现已上线十多个项目的积分市场,各项目积分价值如何?积分非线性兑换情况下如何结算?双押机制是否有安全问题?Odaily 将于本文解答这些问题。

数据汇总

本节对各协议的用户持有总分和 Whales Market 积分市场价格汇总如下,按照 Whales Market 中的总交易量(Total Volume)升序,理论上总交易量越高价格越接近合理数值。

其中部分协议未有官方披露的总积分数,由 Odaily 直接对排行榜进行汇总统计,统计总数详见表中备注。由于积分具有长尾效应,例如 marginfi 前 100 名积分占 1000 名的 54% ,Parcl 前 100 名占 500 名的 93% ,因此所有用户的积分总价值预计与表中统计结果无明显差异。

根据下表,若积分总额低而融资金额高,意味着项目距离空投或其他代币激励还有一定时间,用户可根据项目背景和积分获取速度决定是否参与;若积分总额高而融资金额低,则可能存在高估风险。

数据解析15个Whales Market上的项目积分价值:哪些值得参与?如何结算?

积分结算问题

在积分如何结算方面,存在几个问题在白皮书中未有明确,在咨询项目人员后解答如下。

问题:当代币奖励与积分并非线性关系时如何结算?例如某地址拥有 100 分,而在空投规则里 100 分的地址不发放空投,但在 Whales Market 单独出售了 100 分,如何结算?

解答:对于每个项目,在项目开启基于积分的空投后,Whales Market 官方将为这个项目单独计算一个兑换系数,不论在积分市场上出售了涉及多少积分的单子,均按照统一的兑换系数计算,卖方根据换算后的应交付代币进行卖单结算。(原文:Our team will calculate the average conversion rate and move according to that)

问题:当某个项目最终决定不参考积分进行空投,此时市场上已成交的积分单如何结算?

解答:所有成交单将被撤销,然后向所有用户退款。

问题:项目已宣布空投且买卖单已成交,但迟迟不发放代币,能够撤销成交单吗?

解答:已成交单无法撤销,需等待 TGE 后开启结算。

(Whales Market 功能、机制、运行流程和代币解读详见下文:《积分制协议太多,难以定价和抉择?Whales Market 这样解决》)

安全问题

此外,Whales Market 采取了双押模式,买卖双方都需要质押资金在平台合约中,因此存在对安全方面的疑虑,对于部分问题,Odaily 咨询了安全团队 Beosin 的相关人士,问题及解答如下。

问题:买卖双方进行双押的资金合约,是否有后门,项目方是否有权转移?

解答:当前买卖双方进行双押的资金合约中并没有后门,但由于该合约是可升级合约,其风险点在于项目方或是控制了 ProxyAdmin 合约(0xeB5E772919661F455619A4cABd9B2b64715505E6)的人可以通过升级合约实现恶意的攻击。

问题:平台如果出现无法登陆的情况下,能否通过合约进行解除交割? 

解答:平台如果无法登陆,目前可以由合约的管理员调用 forceCancelOrder()解除订单,将资产返回给买卖双方。合约代码如下: https://etherscan.io/address/0x0e57fff83ae53b22c5b656745168b21a9d2ac3da#code#F 19 #L2 79 

结论

Whales Market 的积分市场极大程度地解决了积分市场的定价与锁定利润需求,但存在资金占用高、项目方仍有超级权限等瑕疵,用户可根据实际需求选择使用。

Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit29 мин. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit29 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片