美联储2月议息会议前瞻:“鹰派”不松口,市场将“见血”?

比推Опубликовано 2023-02-01Обновлено 2023-02-01

Введение

2月加息25个基点已经被市场彻底消化,市场关注点在于美联储主席是如何叙述未来政策路径。

加密市场以积极的面貌开启了2023年,比特币近 40% 的价格涨幅跑赢了传统风险资产。随着周三重要的美联储 (Fed) 利率决议公告临近,加密市场策略师警告道,美联储主席鲍威尔可能在新闻发布会上坚持他的鹰派言论,因此比特币可能会打破年初至今的涨势,但这种回调将是“短期且健康”的。

“”

继去年加息 425 个基点 (bps)后,美国12月份经济数据显示通胀已经降温,其中衡量工资的重要指标–就业成本指数–显示,第四季度工资增幅 1%,低于道琼斯 1.1% 的估计。市场预期美联储将在周三放慢紧缩步伐至 25 个基点,换言之,加息 25 个基点已被市场消化。投资者的焦点将集中在鲍威尔是否承认近期通胀和经济活动疲软,进而发出暂停紧缩政策的信号,这将增强市场对尽早转向宽松政策的希望。

“”

美联储的长期通胀目标是每年 2%,鲍威尔过去曾表示,在美联储考虑暂停加息之前,他需要看到通胀以有意义的方式走低。

“”

截至周二美股收盘,道琼斯工业平均指数上涨 0.63%;标准普尔 500 指数上涨 0.91%,创下 2019 年以来最好的 1 月涨幅;纳斯达克综合指数上涨 1.19%。比特币上涨 1.6%至 23,115 美元附近。以太坊上涨 1% 至 1,573 美元左右。

“”

分析师认为,美央行政策过早转向的可能性不大,因为最近股票和债券的上涨以及美元的下跌自 4 月以来首次缓解了资本市场的压力,也削弱了美联储通过收紧信贷标准来应对价格压力的努力。

“”

加密资产管理公司 Wave Financial财务负责人 Nauman Sheikh 发表评论称:“在新闻发布会上,鲍威尔很有可能会变得更加鹰派并重新收紧金融环境。因此,我们可以看到加密货币和所有风险资产的健康短期修正”。

“”

Sheikh 补充说,尽管美联储一再警告利率将“长期保持在较高水平”,但市场在定价美联储转向方面已经超前了。

“”

Twitter 用户名为 The Carter 的市场策略师也警告道,随着美联储会议临近,鲍威尔周三将以比市场目前预期更为强硬的方式表态,包括加密货币市场在内的风险资产的“大屠杀”可能成为现实,他认为,这将导致所有风险资产的大幅抛售,其中包括比特币和大多数其他数字资产。他在推文中写道:“2 月 1 日,市场会见‘血’,鲍威尔将通过正面强行降息来重新收紧金融状况”。

美联储定于本周三美国东部时间 2:00 PM(北京时间 6:00AM)宣布其最新的利率决定,大多数分析师预计加息 25 个基点。这也是市场目前的定价,CME 的 FedWatch 工具估计加息 25 个基点的可能性为 98.1%。

Pepperstone 研究主管 Chris Weston 在其市场周报中表示,金融状况已经恢复到鲍威尔可能会表示宽松程度“毫无根据”的程度,这将推低包括科技股和加密货币在内的风险资产。

“”

Weston 写道:“在这个时刻,美联储似乎不太可能表现得鸽派,因此风险在于美联储的鹰派——尽管这是意料之中的——而且在杠杆基金做空美元的市场(即期市场),风险小幅偏向美元上行,这意味着纳斯达克和黄金价格走低”。

“”

加密资产管理公司 Blofin 交易员 Griffin Ardern 对CNBC表示:“每周看跌期权在大宗交易者中很受欢迎,但没有远期月度看跌期权交易的记录”。这暗示着在会议之前,谨慎情绪已经渗透到市场,提振了对短期看跌期权或看跌押注的需求。

“”

牛市可能会快速复苏?

“”

鲍威尔引发的预期回踩可能是短暂的,因为市场最近对美联储的鹰派言论变得有弹性。

“”

本月初,多位美联储官员警告称可能会加息。 尽管如此,比特币本月仍然上涨了 40%,游戏代币等风险更高的加密货币出现了更大的涨势。

“”

宏观投资者 James Choi 发推文说: “我预计美联储将把基金利率提高 25 个基点(已经反映在价格中),并让鲍威尔发表鹰派言论,但这只是烟雾弹,市场具有前瞻性,它将在 3 月份开始定价‘暂停’,届时标准普尔 500 指数将达到 4500 点。”

“”

Choi 补充道:“如果市场先信了鲍威尔,标普就不会达到 4,000 点以及看到如此宽松的金融环境”。

“”

本月初,多位美联储官员警告称可能会加息。 尽管如此,比特币本月仍然上涨了 40%,游戏代币等风险更高的加密货币出现了更大的涨势。

“”

衍生品市场数据显示,持续时间较长的看涨期权斜率(衡量看涨期权相对于看跌期权的成本)仍然偏向看涨期权,Griffin Ardern 称:“市场出现这种情绪的原因是,加息 25 个基点基本已经消化,投资者更倾向于认为鲍威尔的鹰派讲话是虚张声势”。

Похожее

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News3 мин. назад

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News3 мин. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News22 мин. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News22 мин. назад

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit32 мин. назад

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit32 мин. назад

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片