Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight NewsPublicado em 2026-06-23Última atualização em 2026-06-23

Resumo

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pri...

Author: KarenZ, Foresight News

The Glamsterdam upgrade for Ethereum is most easily misunderstood as yet another purely technical iteration to increase throughput. A more accurate description is: it is reorganizing Ethereum's block proposal process, validation process, resource pricing methods, and more, laying the groundwork for higher gas limits, larger blob capacities, and future parallel execution.

As of June 23, 2026, ethereum.org labels Glamsterdam as an upgrade planned for the second half of 2026. The name Glamsterdam comes from the combination of the execution layer upgrade "Amsterdam" and the consensus layer upgrade "Gloas." The official roadmap places it after Fusaka in December 2025 and before Hegotá, clearly listing two main features: enshrined proposer-builder separation (ePBS) and block-level access lists (BAL).

Who Proposes, Who Builds: ePBS Codifies Block Creation Roles into the Protocol

Today's Ethereum block production is like a very tight shift change: someone is responsible for proposing a block, someone else for building the transaction content, with dependencies on off-protocol infrastructure like MEV-Boost and third-party relays.

This system has been running for years, but it places some trust relationships off-protocol and also forces validators to handle consensus, execution, data availability, and other tasks within a very short time window.

One of Glamsterdam's headline changes, EIP-7732, or ePBS (Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation), codifies the division of labor between proposers and builders into the protocol.

Simply put, the proposer is responsible for selecting the consensus block, and the builder is responsible for preparing the transaction content inside it. A builder cannot just make verbal promises; it must first "post a bond" within the protocol: specify exactly which execution payload it will deliver and how much it is willing to pay the proposer. Subsequently, a Payload Timeliness Committee (PTC) will check whether it delivers on time.

The key to this change is not just reducing reliance on third-party relays but also buying time for block propagation and validation.

Today, validators need to handle both consensus and execution simultaneously within a very short critical window; ePBS separates these two tasks, allowing the execution payload to be revealed and verified later. According to the design of EIP-7732, the propagation window for the execution payload—the available time for data to spread through the network and be received by nodes—can be extended from about 2 seconds to about 9 seconds. With a longer window, Ethereum can more safely handle larger payloads when increasing block capacity, reducing the risk of missed votes or reorgs due to nodes not having enough time to download, verify, and vote.

This change may not be directly perceptible to ordinary users, but it is crucial for Ethereum scaling. A longer propagation and validation window means the network can more securely handle larger loads. CoinDesk reported on June 16, 2026, citing Ethereum Foundation DevOps engineer Parithosh Jayanthi, that Glamsterdam could be one of the biggest forks since the Merge, changing many assumptions about Ethereum and preparing for larger-scale scaling in the future.

BAL and Repricing: Scaling Isn't Just About Stepping on the Gas, It's Also About Managing the Database

Another core change in Glamsterdam is EIP-7928, Block-Level Access Lists.

It can be understood as providing each block with an "access record": which accounts and which storage locations were touched during the block's execution, and what the related state became after execution, are all recorded. This way, nodes no longer process blocks completely like opening a blind box; they can know earlier which data needs to be read and which computations can be advanced in parallel.

The earlier EIP-2930 introduced transaction-level access lists, but they were optional and saw limited practical use. The change with EIP-7928 is that it elevates access lists to the block level: the block header contains a "fingerprint" (hash) of this list, while the execution payload stores the complete list. Nodes executing the block will verify whether the access records written in the list actually match the block's execution process; if they don't match, the block is invalid.

Why is this important? Today, when Ethereum executes transactions, many data accesses are only known when that specific step is reached. Nodes don't know if a batch of transactions will read/write the same account or storage slot simultaneously, making it hard to confidently process them in parallel. BAL explicitly writes out the access trajectory during block execution, allowing clients to perform parallel disk reads, parallel transaction validation, parallel state root computation, and also update the state in some scenarios without fully replaying transactions. It's not a direct button to lower user fees but opens up engineering space for client-side parallelization.

But Glamsterdam's scaling logic isn't just about "widening the road." It also needs to manage the long-term bloat of Ethereum's database. EIP-8037 increases state creation costs and introduces a cost per state byte (CPSB). State can be understood as the database content that Ethereum must preserve long-term, such as new accounts, new contracts, and new storage slots. Transactions end after execution, but state remains in the ledger that all nodes must maintain; if state grows too fast, running a node becomes increasingly expensive, and decentralization is gradually eroded.

The background numbers provided by EIP-8037 are straightforward: As of January 2026, a Geth node database dedicated to state is about 390 GiB; after the mainnet gas limit increased from 30 million to 60 million, daily new state growth rose from about 105 MiB to about 326 MiB, translating to an annual growth of about 116 GiB. Extrapolating proportionally under a 200 million gas limit, state growth could reach about 387 GiB per year and exceed the 650 GiB performance degradation threshold in less than a year.

Therefore, what EIP-8037 aims to do is separate the pricing of "temporary computation" from "permanently occupying the database." Creating new state will be more expensive because it imposes not a one-time computation cost on the network but a long-term storage burden.

Vitalik Buterin also mentioned, while explaining the Glamsterdam scaling roadmap, that Glamsterdam will separate state creation costs from execution and calldata costs: the goal is to allow execution capacity to expand more significantly while preventing state size from膨胀 at the same rate.

Looking at them together, BAL makes it easier for nodes to process blocks in parallel, addressing "running faster"; state creation repricing makes operations that long-term occupy the database pay a higher cost, addressing "don't let the ledger get fatter and fatter." Glamsterdam's scaling isn't simply raising the gas limit; it's asking a more realistic question: can Ethereum accommodate more transactions while preventing block propagation, transaction validation, and state storage pressures from spiraling out of control.

The Glamsterdam EIP List Takes Shape: Which Are Set, Which Are Still Waiting?

As of June 23, 2026, according to tracking content on Forkcast regarding Ethereum upgrades, Ethereum developers are currently testing the Glamsterdam upgrade in devnets environments, with deployment scheduled for Sepolia on August 3 and for the mainnet on September 16 (specific deployment dates are subject to change).

Currently, 10 EIPs are planned for inclusion in the Glamsterdam list:

EIP-7708 (ETH transfers will also trigger logs, facilitating indexing and tracking of native ETH transfers)
EIP-7732 (ePBS, codifying proposer-builder separation into the protocol, reducing reliance on off-protocol relays)
EIP-7778 (Removes block gas accounting related to gas refunds, simplifying block gas calculation)
EIP-7843 (Adds SLOTNUM opcode, allowing contracts to read the current slot number)
EIP-7928 (Block-level access lists BAL, recording accounts and storage locations accessed during block execution, paving the way for parallel verification)
EIP-7954 (Increases the maximum contract size limit, allowing larger contract bytecode)
EIP-7976 (Increases calldata floor cost, adjusting the minimum cost for calldata)
EIP-7981 (Increases access list cost, recalibrating gas pricing for access lists)
EIP-8024 (Backward-compatible SWAPN, DUPN, EXCHANGE opcodes, enhancing EVM stack operation capabilities)
EIP-8037 (Increases state creation gas cost,抑制 state database过快膨胀)

These EIPs can be roughly categorized into several groups: The first is the restructuring of block proposal and validation processes, with EIP-7732 and EIP-7928 at the core; the second is resource pricing adjustments, including EIP-7778, EIP-7976, EIP-7981, and EIP-8037; the third is EVM and developer experience changes, including EIP-7708, EIP-7843, EIP-7954, and EIP-8024.

In other words, Glamsterdam isn't changing just one feature point; it's simultaneously upgrading block creation roles, parallel validation, gas pricing, and EVM usability.

Another batch of EIPs remains on the "Considered for Inclusion" list:

EIP-2780 (Splits transaction intrinsic gas by resource)
EIP-7610 (Contract creation reverts when using a non-empty storage account)
EIP-7688 (Future-compatible consensus layer data structure)
EIP-7904 (Computational gas cost analysis, potentially to be removed from Glamsterdam)
EIP-7975 (eth/70, partial block receipt lists)
EIP-7997 (Deterministic factory contracts)
EIP-8038 (State access gas cost updates)
EIP-8045 (Excludes slashed validators from continuing to propose blocks)
EIP-8061 (Increases exit and merge churn)
EIP-8070 (eth/72, Sparse Blobpool)
EIP-8080 (Allows exits to use the consolidation queue)
EIP-8136 (Cell-level deltas for data column broadcasts)
EIP-8159 (eth/71, block access list exchange)
EIP-8246 (Removes SELFDESTRUCT burn)
EIP-8282 (Builder Execution Requests, provides dedicated registration and exit requests for ePBS builders)

Additionally, Forkcast currently lists EIP-8254 (Limits the number of deposit requests per execution layer block to 8192) on the "Proposed for Inclusion" list.

From a staker's perspective, EIP-8061 and EIP-8080 on the considered list are particularly noteworthy. For stakers, this could mean improved exit liquidity. Figment stated in an article on May 5, 2026, that institutional stakers should pay most attention to ePBS, EIP-8061, and EIP-8080, estimating that under the ~38.9 million ETH staked规模 as of April 2026, EIP-8061 could increase the exit churn limit from 256 ETH/epoch to ~1187 ETH/epoch, while EIP-8080 allows regular exits to utilize spare capacity in the merge queue. Figment also cautions that all pre-mainnet numbers should be considered speculative.

Source: Figment

The Protocol is Upgrading, and Foundation Members Are Also Changing

The technical preparation for Glamsterdam coincides almost simultaneously with personnel changes in the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol cluster. An Ethereum Foundation blog post on May 11, 2026, stated that Glamsterdam had reached several milestones: a 200 million gas limit floor had been established as a credible post-Glamsterdam target, ePBS was running stably on multi-client Glamsterdam devnets, and EIP-8037 was finalized.

The same article announced a leadership transition for the Protocol cluster: Will Corcoran, Kev Wedderburn, and Fredrik would become the new Protocol cluster coordinators. Original coordinators Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko left the Ethereum Foundation, and Alex Stokes is on leave.

The Foundation's description of the分工 for the three new coordinators is: Will Corcoran has cross-team coordination experience; Kev Wedderburn leads the zkEVM team; Fredrik leads the Protocol Security and Trillion Dollar Security project.

These changes didn't stop at the protocol team. On June 18, 2026, Hsiao-Wei Wang posted that after a leave of absence, they had decided to resign from their positions as Co-Executive Director and Board Member of the Ethereum Foundation.

Former Ethereum Foundation researcher Dankrad Feist stated on June 19, 2026, that those leaving the EF are believers in CROPS (Censorship & Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), that the issue isn't with strategy but with management, and called this wave of talent outflow slightly bearish for Ethereum. Miden co-founder Azeem interpreted it from the opposite direction, believing the EF struggles to change itself, and that the talent outflow might lead to the formation of new organizations better able to execute the Ethereum roadmap, ultimately a net positive for the ecosystem long-term.

The narrative from within the Ethereum Foundation sounds more like setting boundaries. Ethereum Foundation Interim Co-Executive Director Bastian Aue (Aerugo) responded that reasons for EF members leaving include strategic disagreements, role fit, normal institutional turnover, or personal choice, that the EF wouldn't discuss individual personnel matters on social media, but stated that those leaving should have a dignified way to depart.

The Ethereum Foundation later provided a clearer organizational narrative via an official Twitter thread: realizing Ethereum's potential requires a coalition of multiple organizations, and over the past year, several organizations have jointly enhanced the ecosystem's resilience and capabilities. Examples listed by the EF include: ethlabs announced on June 23 (a non-profit R&D lab focused on the next stage of Ethereum and ETH adoption), the Eth Apps Guild launched in April 2026 (focused on real adoption of Ethereum-native apps, especially in emerging markets), the Ethereum Economic Zone launched in 2026 (aiming to reduce ecosystem fragmentation through synchronous composability and zero-knowledge real-time proofs), and Argot established in 2025 (an autonomous collective of engineers and researchers maintaining Solidity and open-source compiler tools).

This official thread makes the recent changes at the Ethereum Foundation easier to understand: the Foundation isn't simply pushing people and projects out, nor is it abandoning central coordination; rather, it might be distributing the Ethereum roadmap across more organizations to shoulder together.

Summary

Therefore, Glamsterdam shouldn't be seen merely as a set of EIPs. It is a significant engineering reorganization by Ethereum before achieving higher throughput: who builds blocks, who proposes them, who validates them, which data must be stored long-term, and which resources should be more expensive are all being re-examined.

The keywords for the technical route are ePBS, BAL, and the beginning of multi-dimensional gas; the keywords for the organizational route are more pragmatic: can the Ethereum Foundation maintain its coordinating power, and can new organizations outside the Foundation turn this coordinating power into sustained delivery.

References:

https://forkcast.org/upgrade/glamsterdam/

https://ethereum.org/roadmap/glamsterdam/

https://blog.ethereum.org/2026/05/11/protocol-update-may-26

https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/2027403360484430122

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core purpose of the Glamsterdam upgrade for Ethereum?

AThe Glamsterdam upgrade is not simply about increasing throughput. Its core purpose is to restructure key processes like block production, validation, and resource pricing to pave the way for higher gas limits, larger blob capacity, and future parallel transaction execution. It aims to handle more transactions while preventing uncontrolled growth in block propagation time, verification pressure, and state storage size.

QWhat is ePBS (EIP-7732) and why is it significant in Glamsterdam?

AePBS (Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation) formally encodes the division of labor between block proposers and block builders into the Ethereum protocol. Proposers choose consensus blocks, while builders prepare the transaction content. Builders must provide collateral and their execution payload, which is verified by a Payload Timeliness Committee (PTC). This reduces reliance on external relays like MEV-Boost and crucially extends the execution payload propagation window from ~2 seconds to ~9 seconds. This longer window allows for safer processing of larger block capacities without increasing the risk of missed votes or reorgs.

QHow does the Block-Level Access List (BAL, EIP-7928) facilitate future scaling?

AThe Block-Level Access List (BAL) attaches a detailed 'access record' to each block, listing every account and storage slot touched during execution and their resulting states. This allows nodes to know in advance which data needs to be read, enabling parallel disk reads, parallel transaction verification, and parallel state root calculations. By making data access patterns explicit, BAL creates an engineering foundation for parallel execution, allowing the network to process blocks faster and more efficiently, which is critical for handling higher transaction loads.

QWhy is EIP-8037 (increasing state creation cost) necessary alongside capacity increases?

AEIP-8037 is necessary to decouple the cost of 'permanent database occupancy' (state growth) from the cost of 'temporary computation'. State (like new accounts and contracts) persists indefinitely on all nodes, leading to database bloat and increased hardware costs that threaten decentralization. With projections showing state growth could exceed performance thresholds under higher gas limits, EIP-8037 significantly raises the gas cost for creating new state. This allows execution capacity (transactions per block) to increase more aggressively while preventing the state database from expanding at an unsustainable rate.

QWhat are the potential implications of the recent Ethereum Foundation personnel changes for the Glamsterdam upgrade and Ethereum's development?

AThe recent changes, including the departure of key figures and the promotion of new protocol cluster coordinators, have sparked debate. Some see it as a potential 'brain drain' that could slow progress. However, the Ethereum Foundation's official narrative frames it as part of a strategic shift towards a 'coalition of organizations' (like ethlabs, Eth Apps Guild, Ethereum Economic Zone, and Argot) sharing the responsibility for executing Ethereum's roadmap. The implication is that the Foundation aims to distribute coordination and development efforts more broadly across the ecosystem, which could enhance resilience and execution capacity in the long term, albeit with potential short-term transition challenges.

Leituras Relacionadas

8.5 Million USDT Flees Overnight: Can High-Yield Stablecoin Vaults Still Be Safely Deposited?

$8.5M USDT Exodus Triggers High-Yield Stablecoin Vault Shutdown Fears of a liquidity crunch following a third-party auditor's withdrawal from competitor MainStreet triggered over $8.5 million in user withdrawals from Altura's stablecoin vault in 24 hours, forcing it to begin an orderly wind-down. Altura clarified it holds no MainStreet assets, indicating the crisis stemmed from a sector-wide loss of confidence rather than direct asset contagion. The incident highlights a critical vulnerability in high-yield stablecoin products: a mismatch between user expectations for instant redemptions and the illiquid, long-duration nature of underlying investments like private credit and real-world assets (RWA). Even without actual losses, the mere prospect of being last in line for repayment can spark a debilitating bank run. The key lesson is that operational liquidity risk and market confidence are decisive factors. Tools like reserve audits, intended to reduce uncertainty, can backfire if their withdrawal accelerates panic faster than assurances can spread. The industry must now observe how Altura manages its asset liquidation and user reimbursements, a process that will test the feasibility of offering DeFi-native speeds on traditionally illiquid yield strategies.

Foresight NewsHá 27m

8.5 Million USDT Flees Overnight: Can High-Yield Stablecoin Vaults Still Be Safely Deposited?

Foresight NewsHá 27m

A Threefold Performance Leap! NEAR Achieves 200ms Physical Block Time Limit with SPICE

NEAR's core development team, Near One, has announced its next major protocol evolution: SPICE (Separation of Consensus and Execution). Currently in development, SPICE represents the most significant upgrade before the full implementation of Nightshade 3.0. Its core innovation is decoupling the consensus layer, responsible for ordering transactions, from the execution layer, which processes them. This allows the consensus layer to run at full speed without waiting for transaction execution to complete. Once deployed, SPICE is projected to triple NEAR's block production speed, achieving a 200ms block time, which is considered the physical limit due to the speed of light and network latency. This leap will dramatically reduce transaction latency and finality, with transactions confirming in roughly 0.4 seconds—faster than a typical card payment. The upgrade also enables more complex, long-running transactions and significantly improves user experience for applications like NEAR Intents and near.com. Beyond raw speed, SPICE enhances network scalability and security. It enables deeper parallelism, efficiently distributing workload across shards and improving resource utilization. The simpler block structure and lighter contracts also facilitate formal verification and security auditing. Furthermore, SPICE lays the critical groundwork for future Nightshade 3.0 features, most notably atomic cross-shard transactions, which would simplify complex contract logic and eliminate development hurdles caused by asynchronous execution. The Near One team is actively developing SPICE, targeting deployment in the coming months.

Foresight NewsHá 59m

A Threefold Performance Leap! NEAR Achieves 200ms Physical Block Time Limit with SPICE

Foresight NewsHá 59m

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: AMD Restores Consumer CPU Memory Encryption Function, South Korean Chip Stocks Plunge 10% Triggering Market Turmoil

The technology sector experienced significant volatility, with a sharp decline in chip stocks. South Korea's KOSPI index plummeted nearly 10%, led by major players like Samsung and SK Hynix, indicating a potential sentiment shift in the AI hardware frenzy. AMD reversed a prior decision by reinstating memory encryption features in its consumer CPUs following user privacy concerns. In the AI software realm, user dissatisfaction is growing. Cursor IDE users are canceling subscriptions, citing declining code completion quality and slower responses. OpenAI's new Mac ChatGPT client is reportedly plagued by frequent crashes. Meanwhile, the community eagerly anticipates the release of DeepSeek's V4.1 model. Elsewhere, Huawei pledged to underwrite liability for its intelligent driving system while raising its premium software package price. Apple fixed a critical eavesdropping vulnerability in Beats Studio Buds. In finance, markets saw a broad "Black Tuesday," with gold prices falling and tech stocks like SpaceX and Micron dropping significantly. Analysts warn of a potential AI bubble. The overarching theme suggests the AI narrative is transitioning from initial hype to a phase demanding proven, stable value.

marsbitHá 1h

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: AMD Restores Consumer CPU Memory Encryption Function, South Korean Chip Stocks Plunge 10% Triggering Market Turmoil

marsbitHá 1h

Donald Trump’s 2031 Post-Quantum Security Mandate Sparks Urgent Crypto Upgrade Efforts

U.S. President Donald Trump has issued executive orders mandating federal agencies to upgrade their cryptographic systems to quantum-resistant technologies. Key deadlines include enhancing critical systems by December 2030 and migrating all federal digital signature infrastructure to post-quantum standards by December 2031. The move addresses "harvest now, decrypt later" threats, where encrypted data could be decrypted by future quantum computers. The directive has spurred urgency in the crypto and blockchain industry, which relies heavily on elliptic curve cryptography vulnerable to quantum attacks. Recent advancements, like those from Google Quantum AI, have reduced the resources needed for such attacks. In response, projects like Ethereum, Algorand, and Ripple are developing or implementing quantum-resistant signature schemes and migration plans. The mandate also highlights risks to Bitcoin, where exposed public keys in legacy addresses could be targeted. Overall, the orders accelerate a broader shift toward post-quantum security across both government and private sectors.

TheNewsCryptoHá 1h

Donald Trump’s 2031 Post-Quantum Security Mandate Sparks Urgent Crypto Upgrade Efforts

TheNewsCryptoHá 1h

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Decentralized Reasoning: Beyond the Hype, a Key to Breaking AI's Centralized Monopoly A future scenario where a powerful AI model is banned by a major government illustrates the core value proposition of decentralized AI: resistance to censorship. The core bet of decentralized inference networks is mitigating this risk, with other benefits like cost being secondary. The path is extremely difficult, involving four key challenges: 1. **Running Massive Models:** Distributing a single model across a decentralized GPU swarm requires sophisticated techniques like pipeline and speculative decoding to overcome crippling network latency, aiming for usable speeds (e.g., 30-40 tokens/second). 2. **Proving Model Integrity:** Verifying that a node runs the correct model is critical. Solutions range from cryptographically secure but slow ZKML to faster, economically-secure methods like statistical fingerprints, deterministic re-execution, or live-weight proofs, each involving trade-offs between integrity, latency, and cost. 3. **Ensuring Prompt Privacy:** Simply sharding a model does not protect user inputs from nodes. Robust solutions currently require trusted hardware (TEEs) or advanced cryptography (FHE), which are not yet widely deployed in consumer swarms. 4. **Building a Real Market:** Identifying the ideal customer is tough. Beyond speculative AI agents, the viable market currently consists of startups embedding AI and projects needing batch processing (e.g., synthetic data generation), where decentralized aggregation can be an advantage over low-latency needs. The article analyzes several projects tackling these problems, such as Dolphin Network (live-weight proofs), Inference.net (statistical verification), Morpheus (TEE-based), and Darkbloom (Apple Secure Enclave). It provides a framework: decentralization is a "tax" for latency-sensitive applications (e.g., chat) but a potential supply-side advantage for throughput-oriented tasks (e.g., batch processing). The long-term vision is a closed data loop where decentralized inference generates valuable data (traces, preferences) to feed decentralized training networks, which in turn produce better open-weight models for the inference networks. A due diligence checklist advises focusing on projects that: are truly decentralized at specific layers; have a credible integrity method; offer real cost benefits; ensure genuine privacy; handle node reliability; have paying users; and are built by teams with deep AI expertise. The ultimate goal should be products that appeal beyond the crypto-native audience, using crypto mechanisms invisibly to deliver better cost, performance, or privacy.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

O que é $S$

Compreender o SPERO: Uma Visão Abrangente Introdução ao SPERO À medida que o panorama da inovação continua a evoluir, o surgimento de tecnologias web3 e projetos de criptomoeda desempenha um papel fundamental na formação do futuro digital. Um projeto que tem atraído atenção neste campo dinâmico é o SPERO, denotado como SPERO,$$s$. Este artigo tem como objetivo reunir e apresentar informações detalhadas sobre o SPERO, para ajudar entusiastas e investidores a compreender as suas bases, objetivos e inovações nos domínios web3 e cripto. O que é o SPERO,$$s$? O SPERO,$$s$ é um projeto único dentro do espaço cripto que procura aproveitar os princípios da descentralização e da tecnologia blockchain para criar um ecossistema que promove o envolvimento, a utilidade e a inclusão financeira. O projeto é concebido para facilitar interações peer-to-peer de novas maneiras, proporcionando aos utilizadores soluções e serviços financeiros inovadores. No seu núcleo, o SPERO,$$s$ visa capacitar indivíduos ao fornecer ferramentas e plataformas que melhoram a experiência do utilizador no espaço das criptomoedas. Isso inclui a possibilidade de métodos de transação mais flexíveis, a promoção de iniciativas impulsionadas pela comunidade e a criação de caminhos para oportunidades financeiras através de aplicações descentralizadas (dApps). A visão subjacente do SPERO,$$s$ gira em torno da inclusão, visando fechar lacunas dentro das finanças tradicionais enquanto aproveita os benefícios da tecnologia blockchain. Quem é o Criador do SPERO,$$s$? A identidade do criador do SPERO,$$s$ permanece algo obscura, uma vez que existem recursos publicamente disponíveis limitados que fornecem informações detalhadas sobre o(s) seu(s) fundador(es). Esta falta de transparência pode resultar do compromisso do projeto com a descentralização—uma ética que muitos projetos web3 partilham, priorizando contribuições coletivas em vez de reconhecimento individual. Ao centrar as discussões em torno da comunidade e dos seus objetivos coletivos, o SPERO,$$s$ incorpora a essência do empoderamento sem destacar indivíduos específicos. Assim, compreender a ética e a missão do SPERO é mais importante do que identificar um criador singular. Quem são os Investidores do SPERO,$$s$? O SPERO,$$s$ é apoiado por uma diversidade de investidores que vão desde capitalistas de risco a investidores-anjo dedicados a promover a inovação no setor cripto. O foco desses investidores geralmente alinha-se com a missão do SPERO—priorizando projetos que prometem avanço tecnológico social, inclusão financeira e governança descentralizada. Essas fundações de investidores estão tipicamente interessadas em projetos que não apenas oferecem produtos inovadores, mas que também contribuem positivamente para a comunidade blockchain e os seus ecossistemas. O apoio desses investidores reforça o SPERO,$$s$ como um concorrente notável no domínio em rápida evolução dos projetos cripto. Como Funciona o SPERO,$$s$? O SPERO,$$s$ emprega uma estrutura multifacetada que o distingue de projetos de criptomoeda convencionais. Aqui estão algumas das características-chave que sublinham a sua singularidade e inovação: Governança Descentralizada: O SPERO,$$s$ integra modelos de governança descentralizada, capacitando os utilizadores a participar ativamente nos processos de tomada de decisão sobre o futuro do projeto. Esta abordagem promove um sentido de propriedade e responsabilidade entre os membros da comunidade. Utilidade do Token: O SPERO,$$s$ utiliza o seu próprio token de criptomoeda, concebido para servir várias funções dentro do ecossistema. Esses tokens permitem transações, recompensas e a facilitação de serviços oferecidos na plataforma, melhorando o envolvimento e a utilidade gerais. Arquitetura em Camadas: A arquitetura técnica do SPERO,$$s$ suporta modularidade e escalabilidade, permitindo a integração contínua de funcionalidades e aplicações adicionais à medida que o projeto evolui. Esta adaptabilidade é fundamental para manter a relevância no panorama cripto em constante mudança. Envolvimento da Comunidade: O projeto enfatiza iniciativas impulsionadas pela comunidade, empregando mecanismos que incentivam a colaboração e o feedback. Ao nutrir uma comunidade forte, o SPERO,$$s$ pode melhor atender às necessidades dos utilizadores e adaptar-se às tendências do mercado. Foco na Inclusão: Ao oferecer taxas de transação baixas e interfaces amigáveis, o SPERO,$$s$ visa atrair uma base de utilizadores diversificada, incluindo indivíduos que anteriormente podem não ter participado no espaço cripto. Este compromisso com a inclusão alinha-se com a sua missão abrangente de empoderamento através da acessibilidade. Cronologia do SPERO,$$s$ Compreender a história de um projeto fornece insights cruciais sobre a sua trajetória de desenvolvimento e marcos. Abaixo está uma cronologia sugerida que mapeia eventos significativos na evolução do SPERO,$$s$: Fase de Conceituação e Ideação: As ideias iniciais que formam a base do SPERO,$$s$ foram concebidas, alinhando-se de perto com os princípios de descentralização e foco na comunidade dentro da indústria blockchain. Lançamento do Whitepaper do Projeto: Após a fase conceitual, um whitepaper abrangente detalhando a visão, os objetivos e a infraestrutura tecnológica do SPERO,$$s$ foi lançado para atrair o interesse e o feedback da comunidade. Construção da Comunidade e Primeiros Envolvimentos: Esforços ativos de divulgação foram feitos para construir uma comunidade de primeiros adotantes e investidores potenciais, facilitando discussões em torno dos objetivos do projeto e angariando apoio. Evento de Geração de Tokens: O SPERO,$$s$ realizou um evento de geração de tokens (TGE) para distribuir os seus tokens nativos a apoiantes iniciais e estabelecer liquidez inicial dentro do ecossistema. Lançamento da dApp Inicial: A primeira aplicação descentralizada (dApp) associada ao SPERO,$$s$ foi lançada, permitindo que os utilizadores interagissem com as funcionalidades principais da plataforma. Desenvolvimento Contínuo e Parcerias: Atualizações e melhorias contínuas nas ofertas do projeto, incluindo parcerias estratégicas com outros players no espaço blockchain, moldaram o SPERO,$$s$ em um jogador competitivo e em evolução no mercado cripto. Conclusão O SPERO,$$s$ é um testemunho do potencial do web3 e das criptomoedas para revolucionar os sistemas financeiros e capacitar indivíduos. Com um compromisso com a governança descentralizada, o envolvimento da comunidade e funcionalidades inovadoras, abre caminho para um panorama financeiro mais inclusivo. Como em qualquer investimento no espaço cripto em rápida evolução, potenciais investidores e utilizadores são incentivados a pesquisar minuciosamente e a envolver-se de forma ponderada com os desenvolvimentos em curso dentro do SPERO,$$s$. O projeto demonstra o espírito inovador da indústria cripto, convidando a uma exploração mais aprofundada das suas inúmeras possibilidades. Embora a jornada do SPERO,$$s$ ainda esteja a desenrolar-se, os seus princípios fundamentais podem, de facto, influenciar o futuro de como interagimos com a tecnologia, as finanças e uns com os outros em ecossistemas digitais interconectados.

73 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2024.12.17

O que é AGENT S

Agent S: O Futuro da Interação Autónoma no Web3 Introdução No panorama em constante evolução do Web3 e das criptomoedas, as inovações estão constantemente a redefinir a forma como os indivíduos interagem com plataformas digitais. Um projeto pioneiro, o Agent S, promete revolucionar a interação humano-computador através do seu framework aberto e agente. Ao abrir caminho para interações autónomas, o Agent S visa simplificar tarefas complexas, oferecendo aplicações transformadoras em inteligência artificial (IA). Esta exploração detalhada irá aprofundar-se nas complexidades do projeto, nas suas características únicas e nas implicações para o domínio das criptomoedas. O que é o Agent S? O Agent S é um framework aberto e agente, especificamente concebido para abordar três desafios fundamentais na automação de tarefas computacionais: Aquisição de Conhecimento Específico de Domínio: O framework aprende inteligentemente a partir de várias fontes de conhecimento externas e experiências internas. Esta abordagem dupla capacita-o a construir um rico repositório de conhecimento específico de domínio, melhorando o seu desempenho na execução de tarefas. Planeamento ao Longo de Longos Horizontes de Tarefas: O Agent S emprega planeamento hierárquico aumentado por experiência, uma abordagem estratégica que facilita a decomposição e execução eficientes de tarefas intrincadas. Esta característica melhora significativamente a sua capacidade de gerir múltiplas subtarefas de forma eficiente e eficaz. Gestão de Interfaces Dinâmicas e Não Uniformes: O projeto introduz a Interface Agente-Computador (ACI), uma solução inovadora que melhora a interação entre agentes e utilizadores. Utilizando Modelos de Linguagem Multimodais de Grande Escala (MLLMs), o Agent S pode navegar e manipular diversas interfaces gráficas de utilizador de forma fluida. Através destas características pioneiras, o Agent S fornece um framework robusto que aborda as complexidades envolvidas na automação da interação humana com máquinas, preparando o terreno para uma infinidade de aplicações em IA e além. Quem é o Criador do Agent S? Embora o conceito de Agent S seja fundamentalmente inovador, informações específicas sobre o seu criador permanecem elusivas. O criador é atualmente desconhecido, o que destaca ou o estágio nascente do projeto ou a escolha estratégica de manter os membros fundadores em anonimato. Independentemente da anonimidade, o foco permanece nas capacidades e no potencial do framework. Quem são os Investidores do Agent S? Como o Agent S é relativamente novo no ecossistema criptográfico, informações detalhadas sobre os seus investidores e financiadores não estão explicitamente documentadas. A falta de informações disponíveis publicamente sobre as fundações de investimento ou organizações que apoiam o projeto levanta questões sobre a sua estrutura de financiamento e roteiro de desenvolvimento. Compreender o apoio é crucial para avaliar a sustentabilidade do projeto e o seu impacto potencial no mercado. Como Funciona o Agent S? No núcleo do Agent S reside uma tecnologia de ponta que lhe permite funcionar eficazmente em diversos ambientes. O seu modelo operacional é construído em torno de várias características-chave: Interação Humano-Computador Semelhante: O framework oferece planeamento avançado em IA, esforçando-se para tornar as interações com computadores mais intuitivas. Ao imitar o comportamento humano na execução de tarefas, promete elevar as experiências dos utilizadores. Memória Narrativa: Utilizada para aproveitar experiências de alto nível, o Agent S utiliza memória narrativa para acompanhar os históricos de tarefas, melhorando assim os seus processos de tomada de decisão. Memória Episódica: Esta característica fornece aos utilizadores orientações passo a passo, permitindo que o framework ofereça suporte contextual à medida que as tarefas se desenrolam. Suporte para OpenACI: Com a capacidade de funcionar localmente, o Agent S permite que os utilizadores mantenham o controlo sobre as suas interações e fluxos de trabalho, alinhando-se com a ética descentralizada do Web3. Fácil Integração com APIs Externas: A sua versatilidade e compatibilidade com várias plataformas de IA garantem que o Agent S possa integrar-se perfeitamente em ecossistemas tecnológicos existentes, tornando-o uma escolha apelativa para desenvolvedores e organizações. Estas funcionalidades contribuem coletivamente para a posição única do Agent S no espaço cripto, à medida que automatiza tarefas complexas e em múltiplos passos com mínima intervenção humana. À medida que o projeto evolui, as suas potenciais aplicações no Web3 podem redefinir a forma como as interações digitais se desenrolam. Cronologia do Agent S O desenvolvimento e os marcos do Agent S podem ser encapsulados numa cronologia que destaca os seus eventos significativos: 27 de Setembro de 2024: O conceito de Agent S foi lançado num artigo de pesquisa abrangente intitulado “Um Framework Agente Aberto que Usa Computadores como um Humano”, mostrando a base para o projeto. 10 de Outubro de 2024: O artigo de pesquisa foi disponibilizado publicamente no arXiv, oferecendo uma exploração aprofundada do framework e da sua avaliação de desempenho com base no benchmark OSWorld. 12 de Outubro de 2024: Uma apresentação em vídeo foi lançada, proporcionando uma visão visual das capacidades e características do Agent S, envolvendo ainda mais potenciais utilizadores e investidores. Estes marcos na cronologia não apenas ilustram o progresso do Agent S, mas também indicam o seu compromisso com a transparência e o envolvimento da comunidade. Pontos-Chave Sobre o Agent S À medida que o framework Agent S continua a evoluir, várias características-chave destacam-se, sublinhando a sua natureza inovadora e potencial: Framework Inovador: Concebido para proporcionar um uso intuitivo de computadores semelhante à interação humana, o Agent S traz uma abordagem nova à automação de tarefas. Interação Autónoma: A capacidade de interagir autonomamente com computadores através de GUI significa um avanço em direção a soluções computacionais mais inteligentes e eficientes. Automação de Tarefas Complexas: Com a sua metodologia robusta, pode automatizar tarefas complexas e em múltiplos passos, tornando os processos mais rápidos e menos propensos a erros. Melhoria Contínua: Os mecanismos de aprendizagem permitem que o Agent S melhore a partir de experiências passadas, aprimorando continuamente o seu desempenho e eficácia. Versatilidade: A sua adaptabilidade em diferentes ambientes operacionais, como OSWorld e WindowsAgentArena, garante que pode servir uma ampla gama de aplicações. À medida que o Agent S se posiciona no panorama do Web3 e das criptomoedas, o seu potencial para melhorar as capacidades de interação e automatizar processos significa um avanço significativo nas tecnologias de IA. Através do seu framework inovador, o Agent S exemplifica o futuro das interações digitais, prometendo uma experiência mais fluida e eficiente para os utilizadores em diversas indústrias. Conclusão O Agent S representa um ousado avanço na união da IA e do Web3, com a capacidade de redefinir a forma como interagimos com a tecnologia. Embora ainda esteja nas suas fases iniciais, as possibilidades para a sua aplicação são vastas e cativantes. Através do seu framework abrangente que aborda desafios críticos, o Agent S visa trazer interações autónomas para o primeiro plano da experiência digital. À medida que avançamos mais profundamente nos domínios das criptomoedas e da descentralização, projetos como o Agent S desempenharão, sem dúvida, um papel crucial na formação do futuro da tecnologia e da colaboração humano-computador.

686 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.01.14

Como comprar S

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Sonic (S) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Sonic (S) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Sonic (S)Depois de comprar o teu Sonic (S), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Sonic (S)Transaciona facilmente Sonic (S) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

1.3k Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de S (S) são apresentadas abaixo.