Who Can Catch Ma Huateng's Red Envelope?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-27Last updated on 2026-01-27

Abstract

The article discusses the intensifying competition among Chinese tech giants in the AI sector, triggered by Tencent’s announcement of a 10 billion yuan cash giveaway through its AI app, Yuanbao, during the Spring Festival. Pony Ma’s move is reminiscent of WeChat’s 2015 “Pearl Harbor-style” disruption of the digital payment market, which helped it compete fiercely with Alipay. Major players like Baidu, ByteDance (with Doubao), and Alibaba (with Qianwen) have also launched large-scale marketing campaigns and春晚 (Spring Festival Gala) partnerships, with billions in subsidies and promotions. The competition has expanded beyond pure AI model performance to include applications, ecosystem integration, and hardware. The AI landscape is described as a “Warring States” era, with ByteDance (compared to Chu), Tencent (Qi), and Alibaba (Wei) leading through distinct strategies: ByteDance leverages short-video content, Tencent focuses on social integration, and Alibaba builds a super-app ecosystem. Other significant players include Baidu and DeepSeek, while smaller firms pivot to niche markets. Despite massive investments—with companies like ByteDance and Alibaba spending hundreds of billions—the industry has yet to find a sustainable business model. Profitability remains elusive, relying on subsidies and user acquisition rather than stable revenue streams like subscriptions or enterprise solutions. Experts suggest 2026 may be a decisive year for AI commercialization, with intensified ...

Author: Ba Xiaoling, Wu Xiaobo Channel

"Hoping to recreate the grand scene of WeChat red envelopes back in the day." With one sentence from Ma Huateng, the atmosphere in the entire domestic large model industry became tense and confrontational again.

The day before, Tencent Yuanbao announced that starting February 1st, it would distribute 1 billion CNY in Spring Festival cash red envelopes through the Yuanbao APP.

Image source: Internet

Competitors had to be on guard. That legendary red envelope shower from WeChat, which was recorded in the history of Chinese internet business wars, was described by Jack Ma as a "sneak attack on Pearl Harbor." In 2015, WeChat Pay partnered exclusively with the Spring Festival Gala, giving out 500 million CNY in WeChat red envelopes. That single night, WeChat garnered 11 billion "shake" interactions, bound over 100 million bank cards, and in just this one battle, forcefully seized half of the online payment market share from Alipay.

Also starting from this year, "Big Tech Red Envelope Wars" began to become part of the Chinese Spring Festival Gala memory. From Alipay to Douyin and Kuaishou, then to Taobao, JD.com, and Pinduoduo, it seems any internet giant worth its salt must have made an appearance at the Spring Festival Gala. The red envelope shower during the Gala also grew from the initial 500 million CNY to last year's 3 billion CNY.

Thus, this became the most anticipated segment of the Spring Festival Gala: which big tech company will give out red envelopes this year.

This year, the giants are once again standing at the same starting line, splashing cash and flying all sorts of marketing activities. When Ma Huateng steps up to "give red envelopes," can other big tech companies catch them?

Internet Giants Launch AI Red Envelope War

On the same day Yuanbao announced its lavish 1 billion CNY giveaway, Baidu also officially announced it would scatter 500 million CNY in Year of the Horse red envelopes and would cooperate with Beijing Television for the Spring Festival Gala.

ByteDance had already tied up with CCTV's Spring Festival Gala a month earlier, using its B2B AI cloud service platform, Volcano Engine, as the exclusive AI cloud partner for the 2026 Spring Festival Gala, while Doubao will配合上线各种互动玩法 (cooperate to launch various interactive features).

Although the official sponsorship amount was not disclosed, there are some reference figures: In 2020, Kuaishou's exclusive cooperation price with CCTV's Spring Festival Gala was 1.3-1.4 billion CNY, with an overall marketing package of about 2 billion CNY. In 2021, Douyin's exclusive cooperation price with CCTV's Spring Festival Gala was around 1 billion CNY, and additionally, on New Year's Eve, it distributed a total of 1.2 billion CNY in cash red envelopes.

Throughout 2025, compared to Tencent and Alibaba, ByteDance's marketing investment in Doubao could be considered "frugal." Some media analysis suggests this Spring Festival Gala sponsorship is likely ByteDance's largest AI brand marketing investment for the entire year.

Alibaba's response posture is to integrate the Alibaba ecosystem of applications, turning the Qianwen APP into a super traffic入口 (entry point) fully connected to shopping, navigation, travel, and a series of other functions, using incentives like food delivery red envelopes for user acquisition. Prior to this, Qianwen also secured the exclusive总冠名 (title sponsorship) of the Bilibili New Year's Eve Gala.

In the view of资深科技自媒体人 (veteran tech we-media personality) Zhuang Minghao, this year's red envelope war also sends an important signal: AI competition is expanding from pure model capability to application and入口 (entry point) competition.

And even before this, the smoke of battle had already filled手机屏幕 (mobile phone screens).

Throughout 2025, the big tech AI arms race was fought from every angle. For example, the talent war: Tencent high-profile hired 27-year-old former OpenAI researcher Yao Shunyu, concurrently serving as head of both the AI Infra department and the large language model department.

Another example is the hardware offense and defense war. Last December, ByteDance suddenly launched a "Doubao Phone," an action that directly切入 (cut into) the underlying mobile phone operating system, triggering joint boycotts from major software manufacturers. After the cold reception, ByteDance turned around and launched AI earphones and an AI "Recording Bean" equipped with Doubao.

On the other side, Alibaba launched the Quark AI glasses equipped with Qianwen, once承包 (monopolizing) the advertising space on the large screens in the passages of Hangzhou's highest traffic subway stations.

2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference, Quark Smart AI Glasses

The most direct is the marketing war. According to a DataEye Research Institute report, in December 2025, in the native AI market, the top five in terms of投放素材量 (volume of advertising materials投放) were依次 (in order) Alibaba Qianwen, Yuanbao, Ant Afu, Doubao, and AI Douyin, accounting for 96% of the monthly投放素材量 in the mainland market.

Perhaps because the budgets were too large and the tasks too heavy, the最终出圈的姿态 (final姿态 that broke through the circle) were also varied and strange. For example, Yuanbao, wanting to conquer the下沉市场 (lower-tier market), went to rural areas to paint slogans on walls, "Difficult postpartum care for sows? Ask Tencent Yuanbao."

Image source: Internet

The most震撼 (stunning) is still the capital war. ByteDance's estimated capital expenditure for 2025 was nearly 160 billion CNY. Recently, overseas institutions reported that ByteDance has raised its 2026 capital expenditure target from 160-180 billion CNY to 300 billion CNY.

Alibaba announced at the beginning of 2025 a plan to invest 380 billion CNY in AI construction over the next three years,刷新 (refreshing) the AI spending record for domestic companies. At the end of the year, it又表示 (further stated), "this number might be conservative."

Ma Huateng, who did not disclose specific figures, also said at Tencent's annual meeting: "In 2025, Tencent played it safe and steady, the only area where we spent relatively more on investment was AI." According to institutional predictions, Tencent's AI capital expenditure in 2025 was close to 100 billion CNY.

"In a word, 2025 was a year of 'certainty.' The value and capability of AI were fully confirmed. Giants saw the situation clearly and went 'ALL IN' with full force; AI became usable, while疯狂基建 (frantic infrastructure building) occurred." Hu Yanping, a specially appointed professor at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, summarized it this way.

And 2026 is the year of "decisiveness."

The Warring States Era of AI

AI industry investor Gao Zhendong compares the current landscape of large model competition to the Warring States era. Each company has its own strengths, and it's hard to distinguish superiority.

Hu Yanping believes that in terms of the overall commercialization picture, domestic AI currently presents a "(3+1)+5+N" pattern.

Among them, "3+1" refers to ByteDance, Alibaba, Tencent, plus Baidu; "5" refers to DeepSeek and the former "Six Little Tigers of Large Models" – Kimi, Zhipu, MiniMax, Step星辰 (Step Star), etc.; "N" refers to other AI enterprises focusing on vertical models and specialized markets.

But with the giants entering with heavy investments, under the spotlight, three "states" stand out in this Warring States struggle.

Gao Zhendong believes ByteDance is similar to the State of Chu:拥有最广的疆域 (having the vastest territory), the thickest foundation, vast land and abundant resources, a latecomer who arrived first, possessing流量母矿 (traffic motherlodes) like Douyin and TikTok.

Tencent is like the State of Qi:富甲天下 (the wealthiest under heaven), sitting on the profits of fishing and salt. It possesses the WeChat "social moat" and ample cash flow. It only needs to guard the social入口 (entry point) and can influence the entire situation with capital and traffic.

Alibaba is more like the State of Wei:率先变法 (the first to enact reforms), profound底蕴 (heritage), talent济济 (abundant talent), possessing强大的组织能力 (strong organizational capabilities). As the pioneer of Chinese cloud computing, Alibaba has打通 (opened up) the entire AI industry chain from chips to the cloud, from models to applications, top to bottom.

The three giants have thus extended their respective strategies.

Alibaba fights an生态战 (ecosystem war). Relying on its application ecosystem, the Qianwen APP is advancing towards becoming a "super app" covering all scenarios of eating, drinking, living, and traveling. It can now achieve ordering takeout, booking flights and hotels, and checking navigation in one stop.

ByteDance relies on short video scenarios, excelling more in AI creation and entertainment-oriented content. Besides the general product Doubao, ByteDance also has the AI creation tool Jimeng AI, which can generate videos, comic dramas, e-commerce pages, advertisements, etc.

Tencent continues to tightly grasp the social入口 (entry point). In the second half of 2025, Tencent Yuanbao successively integrated with Tencent Meeting and QQ, and recently launched the AI social-focused "Yuanbao Pai," which is essentially adding Yuanbao to group chats and supports inviting WeChat friends to join.

Image source: Internet

Beyond the giants displaying their prowess, the market cake left for other competitors seems to be getting smaller.

In Gao Zhendong's view, those that can still be called hegemons alongside the three giants are Baidu and DeepSeek. Baidu is like the State of Zhao in the Warring States, making massive investments in autonomous driving and base large models, with a solid technical foundation—a military power; DeepSeek, although its data and computing power scale cannot match the big factories, its computing efficiency is already on par with the latest models from Google and OpenAI, resembling the State of Han in the Warring States era, with sophisticated weaponry and good at "术"治 (governance by tactics/methods).

More small and medium-sized enterprises are seeking new paths of differentiation. For example, among the "Six Little Tigers of Large Models" that were hugely popular in 2024, Baichuan Intelligence, founded by Sogou founder Wang Xiaochuan, and 01.AI, founded by Kai-Fu Lee, have先后放弃 (successively abandoned) training base large models, turning to industry-level AI applications in healthcare and law; Zhipu AI and MiniMax landed on the Hong Kong stock market in early 2026, pinning their hopes on capital market funds to support subsequent R&D and market investment.

In the view of digital economy scholar Liu Xingliang, second and third-tier models still have space for deep application in细分场景 (segmented scenarios) like education, healthcare, and enterprises, but in the competition for mass入口 (entry points) and traffic, it may already be difficult to compete head-on with the giants.

Zhuang Minghao values "全栈能力" (full-stack capability): The AI competition at the current point is no longer单纯 (purely) model competition, but extends from the cloud to the model to the application, and even needs to expand to chips and hardware.

Hu Yanping uses four dimensions to observe the subsequent competitive situation:

◎ First, technical progress, where coding ability becomes an important central capability.

◎ Second, capital investment. Big factories are multiplying their AI capital expenditures, while slightly smaller leading startups, if they do not have cash reserves and investments of more than 5 billion CNY in 2026, will find it difficult to remain in the second tier.

◎ Third, user base. Either possess a traffic大盘 (large traffic pool) of billions of users, or form alliance cooperation with生态企业 (ecosystem companies) with hundreds of millions of users, otherwise market expansion costs (市场拓展成本) will be extremely high, affecting monetization capabilities.

◎ Fourth, expand monetization channels, quickly forming revenue sources of tens of billions of CNY from AI e-commerce, advertising marketing, enterprise application solutions, API Token, etc., because the Chinese market is an ecosystem where services are often free, and relying solely on subscriptions can hardly support sustainable development.

Therefore, also as Liu Xingliang's view, although the tripod鼎立 (tripod standing stable) seems stable in the short term, the competitive landscape is still full of variables in the future, influenced by technological innovation, outbreaks in vertical细分赛道 (segmented tracks), policy guidance, etc.

App download page in手机应用商店 (mobile app store)

Winner Undecided

The internet industry is no stranger to giant wars.

From the "Group Buying Wars," "Online Payment Wars," "Hundred-Model Wars" to the "Food Delivery Wars," every round of technological or business model innovation is a money-burning war, but these wars ultimately have more losses than wins, and the winners often change unpredictably.

The current battlefield is like the mid-Warring States period, with诸侯并起 (vassals rising together),霸权更替 (hegemony changing hands),改制与变法不断 (reforms and transformations constant), but a new order has yet to be established.

In other words, whether giants or small factories, although their tactics and situations differ, one point is格外一致 (particularly consistent): they have not yet found effective business models and are all operating at huge losses.

In Liu Xingliang's view, the current large model war still relies on the打法 (playbook) of "subsidies + traffic入口" to seize users, which helps educate the market in the early stages but is difficult to profit from in the long run. Real profitability still requires forming stable revenue sources such as paid subscriptions, AI solutions for enterprise customers, and industry定制服务 (customized services).

Also, as Zhuang Minghao said: "The current competition容不得 (does not allow for) consideration of the so-called sustainability of the money-burning model; it's a prisoner's dilemma."

However, the fact that the new order has not yet been established also means that the real winner is still悬念 (in suspense) and perhaps has not even appeared yet.

Hu Yanping believes that in the next stage, whether big factories, mid-stream enterprises, or "little dragons" and "little tigers," all have opportunities. In the short to medium term, having multiple enterprises participate in competition is a good thing, beneficial for industry development and able to provide consumers with diverse choices.

He also judges that the inflection point for AI monetization is即将到来 (approaching). From the close combat of technology and products to the stalemate of marketing competition, it all means that 2026 will become the "first year of AI value harvest." This year, domestic AI will welcome three major changes: big technical investment, big competitive differentiation, and big market分流 (diversion/shift).

It can be predicted that before the outcome of the battle is settled, red envelope showers will continue to fall in various forms. And the answer to this great war might be hidden in your hand: whose red envelope did you catch?

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of the 10 billion yuan red envelope campaign launched by Tencent's Yuanbao app, according to the article?

AIt is an attempt by Tencent to replicate the success of the 2015 WeChat red envelope campaign, which dramatically increased WeChat Pay's market share, and signifies the intensifying competition in the domestic AI industry, shifting from pure model capability to application and entry point competition.

QWhich three major companies are highlighted as the leading contenders in the current AI 'Warring States' era, and what are their respective strengths compared to ancient states?

AByteDance is compared to Chu for its vast territory and massive traffic from apps like Douyin/TikTok; Tencent is compared to Qi for its immense wealth and strong social moat with WeChat; Alibaba is compared to Wei for being a first mover with deep底蕴, strong organizational capability, and a full AI industry chain from chips to the cloud.

QWhat are the four key dimensions mentioned by Hu Yanping to observe the future AI competitive landscape?

AThe four dimensions are: 1. Technological progress, with coding capability as a key central ability. 2. Capital investment, requiring massive spending to stay competitive. 3. User base, needing a huge traffic pool or strategic alliances. 4. Diversified monetization channels, requiring rapid formation of multi-billion RMB revenue streams from various sources beyond just subscriptions.

QWhat is the current state of profitability for companies in the large model competition, as described in the article?

ANone of the companies, whether giants or smaller firms, have found an effective business model and are all operating at a significant loss, currently relying on subsidies and traffic入口 strategies to capture users.

QWhat major marketing and partnership moves did ByteDance and Alibaba make in response to the competitive AI landscape around the Chinese New Year period?

AByteDance partnered with China Central Television's Spring Festival Gala as the exclusive AI cloud partner through its Volcano Engine platform, with its Doubao AI participating in interactive activities. Alibaba integrated its Qianwen app across its ecosystem to create a super traffic入口 and secured the exclusive title sponsorship of the Bilibili New Year's Eve Gala.

Related Reads

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit40m ago

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit40m ago

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit45m ago

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit45m ago

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报48m ago

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报48m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片