XRP market structure echoes early 2022 as short-term buyers accumulate below cost bases

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

According to Glassnode data, XRP's on-chain market structure is mirroring conditions from early 2022, indicating a period of potential consolidation. Short-term buyers (active within one week to one month) are accumulating tokens at prices below the realized cost basis of the six-month to twelve-month holder cohort. This divergence creates distribution stress, as newer participants enter at lower prices while earlier buyers remain underwater, increasing psychological pressure to sell. The supply of XRP held at a loss has risen to approximately 26 billion, while supply in profit has declined to around 40 billion, confirming rising stress among holders. Price action remains fragile, with mixed momentum and struggles to sustain rebounds. The overall structure suggests XRP is entering a consolidation phase rather than a decisive trend reversal, with sustained upside requiring a reclamation of older cost bases and a reduction in loss-held supply.

XRP’s on-chain market structure is beginning to resemble conditions last seen in early 2022, according to new data from Glassnode. Short-term investors are accumulating tokens below the cost basis of longer-term holders.

Glassnode’s Realized Price by Age metric shows that wallets active in the one-week to one-month window are now buying XRP at prices below the realized cost basis of the six-month to twelve-month cohort.

This configuration historically reflects a period of distribution stress, where newer participants enter at lower prices while earlier buyers remain underwater.

In February 2022, a similar structure preceded a prolonged phase of consolidation and downside volatility, as holders who bought near local highs faced increasing psychological pressure to exit positions.

Short-term accumulation builds pressure on older XRP holders

The realized price bands highlight a growing divergence between short-term and mid-term holders. While newer participants appear willing to accumulate at current levels, the six- to twelve-month cohort continues to hold XRP at a higher average cost.

This dynamic can create persistent selling pressure over time. As prices struggle to regain prior cost bases, investors who bought during previous rallies may view rebounds as opportunities to reduce exposure, thereby limiting upside momentum.

Glassnode notes that when this structure persists, it often reflects a market caught between accumulation and distribution, rather than a clear trend reversal.

Supply-in-loss data confirms rising stress among holders

Additional on-chain data strengthens this interpretation. Glassnode’s Total Supply in Loss metric shows a steady increase in the amount of XRP held below cost basis, particularly following the recent pullback from late-2025 highs.

As of this writing, the supply in loss now stands around 26 billion.

Historically, rising supply in loss tends to coincide with weaker price performance, as confidence erodes among holders sitting on unrealized losses.

At the same time, supply in profit has been declining, suggesting fewer tokens are held at comfortable margins. As of this writing, it stands at around 40 billion.

This shift mirrors conditions observed during previous corrective phases, in which recovery required either a prolonged consolidation period or a decisive surge in new demand.

XRP price action remains fragile despite recent bounce

On the 12-hour price chart, XRP recently rebounded toward the $2.00–$2.10 zone after dipping below key short-term support levels. However, directional momentum remains mixed.

The Directional Movement Index [DMI] shows weakening trend strength, with no clear dominance from buyers or sellers.

While short-term rallies have emerged, they have struggled to sustain follow-through, reinforcing the idea that the market remains range-bound.

XRP also continues to trade well below its late-2024 and mid-2025 highs, keeping longer-term holders under pressure as price attempts to stabilize.

Market structure points to consolidation

The realized price divergence, rising supply in loss, and muted trend strength suggest XRP is entering a structural consolidation phase, rather than a decisive trend reversal.

While short-term accumulation may support price in the near term, sustained upside would likely require XRP to reclaim older realized cost bases and reduce the proportion of supply held at a loss.

Until then, the current setup closely resembles early 2022 conditions, when recovery proved slow and uneven despite intermittent rallies.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP’s on-chain structure signals growing tension between newer buyers and longer-term holders, echoing patterns seen ahead of extended consolidation phases in past cycles.
  • Unless price strength is sufficient to relieve pressure on older cohorts, the market may remain vulnerable to volatility and capped upside in the near term.

Related Questions

QWhat does Glassnode's Realized Price by Age metric reveal about the current XRP market structure?

AIt shows that short-term investors (active in the one-week to one-month window) are accumulating XRP at prices below the realized cost basis of the six-month to twelve-month cohort.

QWhat historical period does the current XRP market structure resemble, and what was the outcome then?

AIt resembles the structure seen in early 2022, which preceded a prolonged phase of consolidation and downside volatility.

QAccording to the article, what does a persistent divergence between short-term and mid-term holder cost bases often reflect?

AIt often reflects a market caught between accumulation and distribution, rather than a clear trend reversal.

QWhat do the 'Supply in Loss' and 'Supply in Profit' metrics indicate about the current state of the XRP market?

AThe 'Supply in Loss' has increased to around 26 billion, indicating rising stress, while the 'Supply in Profit' has declined to around 40 billion, suggesting fewer tokens are held at comfortable margins.

QWhat is required for a sustained price recovery in XRP according to the article's conclusion?

ASustained upside would require XRP to reclaim older realized cost bases and reduce the proportion of supply held at a loss.

Related Reads

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit3h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit3h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit3h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片