XPL tests $0.08 demand as bears press hard: Reversal ahead?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

XPL's price has dropped over 12% in 24 hours, approaching a key demand zone at $0.08. Despite a 38% surge in daily trading volume, bearish pressure remains strong, as indicated by negative Bull Bear Power and increased selling activity. The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate has turned sharply negative to -0.0437%, reflecting extreme pessimism among futures investors and heightened short positioning. Network activity has declined significantly over two weeks, though daily transactions saw a slight uptick. A break below $0.08 could establish a new low for XPL, with current market conditions making a bullish reversal challenging.

A few weeks ago, chains associated with the stablecoin narrative were thriving but have since lost the flair. Plasma [XPL] was one of them, with their focus on stablecoin payment, which also featured Tether’s USDT.

XPL lost more than 12% of its total market capitalization in only 24 hours. A spike in daily trading volume by 38% confirmed the selling pressure.

Additionally, the coin’s turnover ratio of 0.436 indicates a significant portion of the capitalization was being traded. Can bulls step in as they did previously as the price approached a key demand zone?

XPL approaches a key demand zone

XPL price extended its decline for the second consecutive day to 18% following the day’s losses.

The current bear strength, as evident from the Bull Bear Power indicator whose bars were increasing in size, was pushing price toward the $0.08 zone.

As per the Market Structure Break and OB Probability indicator, the $0.08 was a key demand zone. Initially, XPL rebounded from this zone and pushed the price above $0.10.

While a decline to the $0.08 zone could trigger bulls into buying, bear strength was still very present. In fact, it increased with each candle close, with BBP at negative 0.0148.

This value was half of what the strongest bears in February had managed.

The decline made a potential rebound at $0.08 difficult with the current conditions. Probably, pessimism among traders and low chain activity amplified the losses.

XPL perpetual Futures traders at extreme pessimism

Looking at the perpetual Futures data for XPL, traders showed pessimism. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate sharply dropped into the negative territory, hitting 0.0437%.

The data showed that the market was overly crowded on the short side, an indication of panic selling. Furthermore, these shorts were paying longs to keep their positions open as well as opening more sell orders.

This sharp decline could mean further downside risk, especially if bulls did not step in. Breaking below $0.08 would create a new low for the altcoin, surpassing the current one at $0.0709.

Activity falls sharply in two weeks

XPL’s network activity was also following the price action. Over the past two weeks, the number of transactions dropped by more than 12%, from 416.5K to 365.9K.

But from a daily perspective, transactions rose by 4.28%, while total transaction fees were up 56%. This spike in activity was probably from the traders who were selling the token.

Meanwhile, its cumulative transaction count stood at 155.76 million at a speed of 4.5 TPS. Generally, most of XPL’s metrics were weak, including its price action, which was approaching a key demand zone.


Final Summary

  • XPL loses 12% as the OI-Weighted Funding Rate turns red and activity drops sharply.
  • XPL price was approaching the demand zone at $0.08, but the bearish strength was not relenting.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price level that XPL is approaching, and why is it considered a key demand zone?

AXPL is approaching the $0.08 level, which is considered a key demand zone because it was the area from which the price previously rebounded and pushed above $0.10.

QWhat does the negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate for XPL perpetual futures indicate about trader sentiment?

AThe negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate of -0.0437% indicates extreme pessimism among traders, with the market being overly crowded on the short side, signaling panic selling and traders paying to keep short positions open.

QHow has XPL network activity changed over the past two weeks according to the article?

AOver the past two weeks, the number of transactions on the XPL network dropped by more than 12%, from 416.5K to 365.9K, indicating a sharp decline in activity.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator value of -0.0148 suggest about the current market strength?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator value of -0.0148 shows significant bearish strength that is increasing with each candle close, making a potential rebound at the $0.08 demand zone difficult.

QWhat was the percentage change in XPL's daily trading volume, and what did this confirm?

AXPL's daily trading volume spiked by 38%, which confirmed the intense selling pressure the token was facing.

Related Reads

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit6m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit6m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手29m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手29m ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is PLASMA

Plasma: A Cutting-Edge Solution for Blockchain Scalability Introduction to Plasma As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, so too does the need for enhanced efficiency within blockchain networks. Plasma, a Layer 2 scaling solution, emerges as a pioneering player in this sphere, particularly in the realm of Web3 development. By strategically shifting a substantial portion of tasks from the main chain to a series of smaller chains, Plasma vows to significantly boost the scalability and performance of Ethereum—a widely-used blockchain platform at the forefront of decentralised applications. What is Plasma? Plasma is an innovative off-chain scaling solution particularly designed for the Ethereum blockchain. It was introduced in August 2017 by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Joseph Poon, a prominent advocate of scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Plasma serves as a framework that enables the creation of scalable applications by establishing a hierarchical structure of child chains above the main Ethereum chain. At its core, Plasma allows for the development of potentially infinite side chains that can operate independently while still relying on the Ethereum network for security and consensus. This architecture is underpinned by smart contracts and Merkle Trees, which efficiently handle transactions and data storage. Core Objectives of Plasma The primary aim of Plasma is to increase the throughput of the Ethereum network. By diverting a substantial volume of transactions away from the congested main chain, Plasma's architecture offers higher transaction speeds, more efficient data processing, and lower transaction costs. This is particularly vital in an age where demand for decentralised applications—especially in finance, gaming, and supply chain management—is reaching unprecedented levels. Creator of Plasma Plasma is the brainchild of two renowned figures in the blockchain community: Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon. Buterin is celebrated primarily for co-founding Ethereum and pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve. Poon, on the other hand, is known for advocating scalable solutions, which enable faster and more cost-effective transactions on blockchain networks. Their collaboration on the Plasma framework has greatly contributed to its innovative nature, combining advanced technical insights with practical applications. Investors of Plasma While the specific investment foundations or organizations supporting Plasma remain undisclosed, the project has garnered interest from various prominent figures and players in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. With its potential for enhancing scalability within Ethereum, it has caught the attention of various entities aiming to push the boundaries of blockchain technology. How Does Plasma Work? Plasma's unique functionality is attributed to its architectural framework that relies on child chains and their interaction with the main Ethereum network. Below are some key factors that contribute to Plasma's innovative approach: Child Chains: Plasma establishes numerous child chains that can execute transactions independently of the main Ethereum chain. Each child chain operates as a separate smart contract with unique features, allowing developers to create tailored solutions based on their specific requirements. Smart Contracts and Merkle Trees: The framework utilises smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements with predefined conditions, paired with Merkle Trees that enable efficient verification of data. This technology allows Plasma to achieve both high scalability and security. Transaction Compression: By batching transactions on the child chains, Plasma reduces the data load on the Ethereum network. This means that fewer transactions need to be recorded on the main chain—thereby freeing up space and reducing congestion. Enhanced Security: Despite being off-chain, Plasma leverages the security measures of the main Ethereum network, ensuring that all transactions on child chains maintain a high level of integrity and security. Timeline of Plasma Understanding the development of Plasma involves tracing its significant milestones: August 2017: Plasma was first introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon as a scalable solution to address Ethereum's performance challenges. 2018: The Plasma framework was officially developed and made available on GitHub, marking a crucial step towards its implementation in practical applications. 2019: As awareness about Plasma grew, it began to attract developers interested in scaling Ethereum applications, thus increasing its adoption. 2020: Plasma continued evolving, with substantial enhancements made to its architecture and functionality—making it even more appealing to developers. Key Features of Plasma Plasma boasts several characteristics that make it a transformative solution in the blockchain space: Scalability: By creating multiple child chains, Plasma can handle a higher volume of transactions without further taxing the main Ethereum chain. Speed: Each child chain can process transactions more swiftly, providing users with better experience and service. Lower Transaction Costs: Plasma's structure effectively reduces the costs associated with transactions by minimizing the burden on the main chain. Interoperability: The architecture allows Plasma to seamlessly interact with multiple blockchains, enhancing cross-network functionality. Security: By harnessing the security of Ethereum’s main chain, Plasma ensures the integrity of its operations while utilising its child chains. Use Cases for Plasma The innovative architecture of Plasma opens the door for various practical applications across different sectors: Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Plasma has the capacity to enhance the scalability and efficiency of DeFi applications, creating smoother and more effective trading processes. Gaming: The framework facilitates the development of quick and cost-efficient gaming experiences, making it appealing to developers in the gaming industry. Supply Chain Management: With the ability to archive efficient transaction processing, Plasma can foster the development of decentralised supply chain management solutions. Conclusion Plasma stands at the forefront of blockchain technology, positioned as a pivotal Layer 2 scaling solution aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Ethereum network and beyond. Through its unique structure of child chains, smart contracts, and Merkle Trees, Plasma offers a compelling solution to the scalability crisis that has long plagued blockchain networks. As blockchain technology continues to advance, solutions like Plasma promise to reshape how developers approach scalability challenges, potentially revolutionising how decentralised applications function. The ongoing efforts by its creators and the interest of various stakeholders signal a bright future for Plasma as it seeks to elevate blockchain capabilities to new heights in the digital realm.

1.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.03Updated 2024.12.03

What is PLASMA

How to Buy XPL

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Plasma (XPL) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Plasma (XPL) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Plasma (XPL)After purchasing your Plasma (XPL), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Plasma (XPL)Easily trade Plasma (XPL) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.09.26Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy XPL

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XPL (XPL) are presented below.

活动图片