Why Was the SEC's Major Cryptocurrency Meeting Canceled? Influential Figures Emerge from Behind the Scenes! Here Are the Details

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-18Last updated on 2026-08-18

Abstract

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) abruptly canceled a key Friday meeting that was set to begin formal rulemaking for a new framework called "Crypto Asset Securities." Officially citing "unexpected scheduling issues," reports now suggest Wall Street pressure played a crucial role. Sources indicate the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) strongly opposed the SEC creating a structure that would grant crypto companies broad exemptions from existing securities rules. SIFMA reportedly questioned the SEC's legal authority for such a framework and hinted at potential legal action, influencing the decision to delay. This development follows the U.S. Senate's postponement of the CLARITY Act until September. Experts note the situation highlights the ongoing, significant debate over which institution—the SEC or Congress—will define U.S. crypto regulation. It remains unclear when the SEC will reschedule the meeting or if the "Crypto Asset Securities" rulemaking process will continue.

New developments continue to emerge regarding the planned regulation of the U.S. cryptocurrency market. First, a scheduled Friday meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which was set to discuss new regulatory frameworks for initial public offerings of crypto assets, was canceled at the last minute. This meeting was expected to initiate the SEC's formal rulemaking process for this new system, known as "Regulation of Crypto Assets."

One of the first to announce the cancellation was American journalist Eleanor Terrett, who stated in her report that the official reason provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission was an "unforeseen scheduling issue."

While market speculation continues regarding the reasons for the cancellation, some sources are now pointing fingers at Wall Street.

Is the Securities and Exchange Commission Under Pressure from Wall Street?

According to Decrypt, Wall Street played a role in the cancellation of the SEC's Friday meeting. Sources report that pressure from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), a major Wall Street organization, was a decisive factor in the cancellation.

According to sources who spoke with Decrypt, SIFMA opposed the SEC creating a framework that could grant crypto companies and tokenization firms broad exemptions from existing securities market regulations.

The report states that SIFMA's main objection centers on whether the SEC can create such a broad regulatory framework using its existing statutory authority.

Sources also reported that SIFMA made it clear it might take legal action if the SEC proceeded with such a step. This reportedly influenced the SEC's decision to postpone the scheduled meeting.

Currently, according to sources, the real behind-the-scenes discussion revolves around the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) regulatory authority over the cryptocurrency market and Wall Street's objections to this regulation.

Notably, these events occurred immediately after the U.S. Senate failed to make progress on passing the CLARITY Act before its August recess, and consideration of the CLARITY Act was postponed until September.

According to experts, the SEC's independent efforts to develop comprehensive rules for the cryptocurrency market, coupled with Congress's attempt to establish a legal framework through the Clarity Act, make the debate over which institution and on what basis will shape U.S. cryptocurrency regulation even more significant.

It remains unclear when the SEC will reschedule the meeting or whether the "Regulation of Crypto Assets" process will continue.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the official reason given by the SEC for canceling its meeting on crypto asset regulation?

AThe official reason given by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for canceling the meeting was an 'unforeseen scheduling issue.'

QWhich Wall Street organization reportedly played a crucial role in pressuring the SEC to cancel the meeting?

AThe Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), a major Wall Street organization, reportedly played a crucial role in pressuring the SEC to cancel the meeting.

QWhat is the core of SIFMA's objection to the SEC's proposed regulatory framework for crypto assets?

AThe core of SIFMA's objection is whether the SEC can create such a broad regulatory framework using its existing legislative authority, fearing it would grant crypto companies and tokenization firms wide exemptions from existing securities market rules.

QWhat recent legislative event, mentioned in the article, preceded the SEC's meeting cancellation?

AThe recent legislative event was the U.S. Senate's failure to make progress on passing the CLARITY Act before its August recess, delaying its consideration until September.

QAccording to experts cited, why is the debate over crypto regulation in the U.S. becoming more significant?

AThe debate is becoming more significant due to the SEC's independent efforts to develop comprehensive crypto market rules, combined with Congress's attempt to create a legal framework through the Clarity Act, raising questions about which institution and on what basis will shape U.S. crypto regulation.

Related Reads

Miners' Sales and Expensive Oil: Experts Name the Causes of Crypto Market Stagnation

"Sales of Miners and Expensive Oil: Experts Name Reasons for Crypto Market Stagnation" The crypto market currently lacks sufficient internal drivers for growth, and escalating tensions around the Strait of Hormuz could further worsen prospects for crypto assets, according to analysts at Wintermute. Key pressures include a significant $390 million net outflow from US spot Bitcoin ETFs from August 10-14, suggesting recent demand was speculative. While some altcoin ETFs saw inflows, Bitcoin's inability to rally on positive news indicates sellers have returned. Another factor is selling pressure from miners, exemplified by Riot Platforms selling 4,300 BTC last quarter while its mining costs exceeded Bitcoin's market price. With a record hash rate, many miners face unprofitable conditions, potentially forcing further sell-offs from their reserves. The primary external risk is macroeconomics, particularly rising energy prices. Brent crude surged nearly 8% due to the Strait of Hormuz situation, threatening to boost US inflation and potentially delay Federal Reserve rate cuts. Wintermute maintains a neutral stance, noting market positions are moderate, but requires stabilization in ETF flows or sustained capital return for a more positive outlook. Upcoming Fed minutes, PMI data, and the Jackson Hole symposium are key events, while the Strait of Hormuz remains a major external risk.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Miners' Sales and Expensive Oil: Experts Name the Causes of Crypto Market Stagnation

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片