Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-16Last updated on 2026-05-16

Abstract

Crypto expert CharuSan argues that Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions, predicting SWIFT may need to integrate XRP to survive. He highlights XRP's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) technology as faster and cheaper, freeing up trillions for banks instantly, while SWIFT is described as cumbersome and slow. CharuSan states that banks' main software is already integrated with Ripple, enabling rapid, widespread adoption. He believes SWIFT must adopt XRP as a liquidity layer to remain relevant, rather than staying a simple messaging service. While SWIFT is developing a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea with partners, CharuSan dismisses this move, noting Linea handles messaging trials but isn't a liquidity solution and incurs verification costs on Ethereum, making it non-viable for payments. In conclusion, CharuSan asserts that without integrating XRP, SWIFT is "doomed" to fade away. At the time of writing, XRP price was around $1.41.

Crypto pundit CharuSan has explained why Ripple’s XRP is a better choice for cross-border transactions than SWIFT. He also predicted that SWIFT is likely to integrate XRP at some point to avoid becoming redundant.

Why Ripple’s XRP Has A Competitive Edge Over SWIFT

In an X post, CharuSan said that SWIFT is cumbersome and slow, and will completely lose its competitive edge against XRP’s ODL technology, which frees up trillions of dollars for banks in seconds. He further noted that XRP addresses these banks’ pain points by enabling faster, cheaper payments, prompting them to reconsider their use of SWIFT.

In line with this, he opined that XRP will take over the market rapidly rather than gradually. The pundit also mentioned that the main software used by banks is already integrated with Ripple, which means that the technical path is ready. CharuSan added that there is no need to meet with 13,000 banks one by one, as a single update will integrate all banks into the system.

CharuSan noted that the real issue for SWIFT is whether it will add XRP to its system as a liquidity layer to keep up with the modern world or remain as a simple messaging service, which could cause it to lose its financial authority and eventually pack up. As such, he believes that SWIFT’s adoption of XRP’s technology at some point is a strategic necessity for the firm’s survival.

However, it is worth noting that SWIFT is developing its distributed ledger on Ethereum layer-2 Linea in partnership with ConsenSys and up to 30 banks. This is part of the firm’s move to expand from solely the messaging layer to an execution layer, enabling 24/7 cross-border payments.

Why The Linea Move Cannot Compare to Using XRP

CharuSan also opined that SWIFT cannot compete with XRP even with its move to develop a distributed ledger on Linea. He explained that Linea is a layer-2 infrastructure, and SWIFT’s experimentation with these networks is limited to messaging and asset-transfer trials. The pundit added that Linea is not a liquidity tool.

As such, CharuSan noted that although Linea aggregates transactions on its own, it still sends this data to the Ethereum network for verification, incurring a cost in the process. He indicated that such a process is not viable for cross-border payments, and so, SWIFT cannot compete with or be compared to XRP. The pundit reiterated that if SWIFT does not reach an agreement with Ripple and integrate XRP as a liquidity layer on its platform, it is “doomed” to fade away.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.41, down over 4% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.41 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason CharuSan believes Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions?

ACharuSan believes XRP is superior because its ODL (On-Demand Liquidity) technology enables faster and cheaper cross-border payments, freeing up trillions of dollars for banks in seconds, unlike the slow and cumbersome SWIFT system.

QWhat does the article suggest is a strategic necessity for SWIFT's survival?

AThe article suggests that for SWIFT's survival, it is a strategic necessity to adopt XRP's technology, specifically by integrating XRP as a liquidity layer on its platform to keep up with modern financial demands.

QAccording to the article, why is SWIFT's development of a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea not a direct competitor to XRP?

ASWIFT's Linea initiative is not a direct competitor to XRP because Linea is a layer-2 infrastructure focused on messaging and asset-transfer trials, not a liquidity tool. Its process still relies on the Ethereum network for verification, incurring costs and making it non-viable for efficient cross-border payments.

QWhat technical advantage does Ripple's XRP have for bank integration, as mentioned by CharuSan?

ACharuSan mentions that the main software used by banks is already integrated with Ripple, meaning the technical path is ready, and a single software update could integrate all banks into the XRP system, eliminating the need for individual negotiations with thousands of banks.

QWhat was the price of XRP and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, the XRP price was trading at around $1.41, down over 4% in the last 24 hours according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Related Reads

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit14m ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit14m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

Recently, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," first outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's March mandate as core principles guiding its focus: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. CROPS represents Ethereum's commitment to providing foundational capabilities for user sovereignty—enabling asset ownership, identity expression, and coordination without reliance on centralized platforms or surrendering ultimate control. This framework is gaining new urgency with the rise of AI, particularly AI agents managing digital assets and automating transactions. While AI offers convenience, it risks centralizing user data, intent, and control if dependent on opaque, centralized services. Vitalik argues for "CROPS AI"—AI that is open, privacy-preserving, secure, and capable of local execution to maintain user agency. He highlights convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layers" and "CROPS AI," such as using zero-knowledge proofs for private remote LLM calls and Ethereum RPC reads, ensuring users can access services without exposing sensitive information. Ultimately, CROPS is not just an abstract ideal but a practical guide for Ethereum's development and AI integration. It addresses the critical long-term question: as digital systems grow more powerful, how can users retain control over their privacy, assets, and autonomy? In an AI-driven era, these principles may define Ethereum's enduring value—prioritizing verifiable, secure, and user-centric design over short-term optimizations like speed and cost alone.

marsbit18m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片