Why Bitcoin traders remain long despite $317M in daily BTC losses

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

Despite Bitcoin [BTC] experiencing intensified selling pressure with daily realized losses widening to a 3-day SMA of -$317 million, traders continue to hold long positions. This reflects exits from distressed holders and narrowing profit-taking opportunities, forcing newer entrants to sell at a loss. The current situation mirrors December 2022, when similar loss levels led to forced selling and weak hands exiting under tight liquidity, followed by gradual price stabilization. Capitulation is deepening as realized losses approach cycle extremes, with single-day losses exceeding $5 billion, rivaling late-2022 levels. Losses as a share of market cap are rising, indicating broader value destruction rather than isolated distress. The loss per coin moved is increasing, suggesting coins are being sold at steeper discounts. Despite Bitcoin's price weakness, long positioning is building, with the Long/Short Ratio often exceeding 2.5–3.0, highlighting traders' overweight bias on BTC for perceived safety. However, this leverage concentration increases systemic liquidation risk, as modest drawdowns could trigger cascading long squeezes. Traders remain heavily invested and at risk of further losses, reflecting a denial of broader downside risk amid an active downtrend.

Bitcoin [BTC] selling pressure intensified as realized losses widened to a 3D-SMA of –$317 million per day, reflecting exits from distressed holders.

As liquidity weakened, profit-taking opportunities narrowed, forcing newer entrants to sell at losses, which deepened net outflows.

Earlier, the metric consistently maintained positive prints, reflecting sustained profitability during the broader uptrend phase.

Sharp spikes interrupted these positive periods, driving realized profits higher as investors sold into market euphoria and elevated leverage conditions.

Source: Glassnode/X

Such spikes often aligned with local price tops, as market participants aggressively locked in gains.

This transition now mirrors December 2022, when cascading liquidations and credit stress pushed realized losses below –$300 million per day.

At that point, forced selling dominated, while weak hands exited under tightening liquidity conditions. Thereafter, price stabilized gradually, supported by patient accumulation and balance sheet repair.

Loss of momentum now appears to be stabilizing, as recent downside spikes are becoming smaller and less frequent.

However, persistent sub-zero readings still signal ongoing capitulation, where supply continues transferring to stronger, conviction-driven holders.

Here’s why capitulation is deepening

Profitability continues to reset as realized losses expand across distribution phases, reinforcing persistent sell-side pressure.

Peak realized losses now approach prior cycle extremes, with single-day prints exceeding $5 billion, rivaling late-2022 capitulation levels.

Source: Glassnode/X

As these peaks emerge, market structure weakens, while confidence and spot demand deteriorate in parallel. Losses as a share of market cap are also rising, signaling broader value destruction rather than isolated holder distress.

This matters because higher proportional losses amplify balance sheet stress across cohorts.

Source: Glassnode/X

The loss per coin moved is rising, indicating that coins are being transferred at steeper discounts relative to their cost basis.

As this trend deepens, leverage continues to unwind, while options markets maintain elevated pricing for downside risk across near‑term maturities.

Leverage crowding builds as Bitcoin long bias intensifies

Long positioning is building across the market as the aggregate Long/Short Ratio trends higher, reflecting rising directional exposure.

However, the increase was not gradual; instead, it formed through sharp, inconsistent spikes, signaling reactive rather than stable conviction.

Bitcoin long demand remains dominant, with ratios often exceeding 2.5–3.0, while altcoin averages stay closer to 1.5–2.0.

This divergence persists despite Bitcoin’s recent price weakness, highlighting that traders remain overweight on BTC for its perceived structural safety.

Source: X

At the same time, leverage concentration is thickening rather than dispersing, raising systemic liquidation sensitivity. As traders add longs into a weakening price structure, positioning reflects a denial of broader downside risk.

Liquidation bands now cluster tightly below recent ranges, meaning modest drawdowns could trigger cascading long squeezes. Funding and Open Interest trends further suggest re-leveraging, not healthy deleveraging, within an active downtrend.

In summary, traders are facing increasing pressure to sell, as they are heavily invested and at risk of losing more money.


Final Thoughts

  • Capitulation pressure is growing because the losses traders are experiencing are similar to those in previous downturns.
  •  Bitcoin-heavy long crowding persists despite deteriorating structure, heightening systemic liquidation risk as leverage rebuilds into an active downtrend.
Next: Bitcoin sinks to 2021 levels as selloff deepens below $70,000
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Related Questions

QWhat is the current daily realized loss level for Bitcoin, and what does it indicate?

AThe current daily realized loss for Bitcoin is a 3-day simple moving average of -$317 million, indicating intensified selling pressure and exits from distressed holders.

QHow does the current market situation compare to December 2022?

AThe current transition mirrors December 2022 when cascading liquidations and credit stress pushed realized losses below -$300 million per day, dominated by forced selling and weak hands exiting under tightening liquidity conditions.

QWhy are traders maintaining long positions despite the ongoing capitulation?

ATraders remain long because Bitcoin is perceived as having structural safety, with long/short ratios often exceeding 2.5-3.0, showing they are overweight on BTC despite recent price weakness.

QWhat risk does the current leverage concentration create for Bitcoin traders?

AThe thickening leverage concentration raises systemic liquidation sensitivity, as modest drawdowns could trigger cascading long squeezes due to tightly clustered liquidation bands below recent price ranges.

QWhat do the rising loss per coin moved and proportional losses relative to market cap signify?

AThe rising loss per coin moved indicates coins are being transferred at steeper discounts, while increasing proportional losses relative to market cap signal broader value destruction and amplified balance sheet stress across holder cohorts.

Related Reads

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit6m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit6m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit59m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片