Whales accumulate Hyperliquid during the dip, not the rally – Why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-23Last updated on 2025-12-23

Abstract

Hyperliquid's large holders (whales) have aggressively accumulated over $21.5M worth of HYPE during the recent price decline, not during rallies, indicating strong conviction. This accumulation, combined with persistent negative exchange outflows, suggests selling pressure is being absorbed and available supply is shrinking. Price action shows HYPE compressing within a descending wedge near key support around $22, with oversold conditions and weakening bearish momentum. Top trader positioning leans long, and funding rates have stabilized, indicating a leverage reset. These converging factors—whale buying, reduced sell supply, cooling leverage, and chart compression—significantly alter the risk profile near support, increasingly favoring a potential relief-driven reversal rather than further downside.

Hyperliquid’s large holders have stepped in aggressively during the recent decline, adding clear numerical weight to the accumulation narrative.

Whales accumulated 427,441 HYPE worth $11.58M at an average $27.09 over two months, while another added 398,830 HYPE worth $10M around $25.22 in just five days.

Combined, whale accumulation now exceeds $21.5M near the current price range.

Importantly, this buying occurred as price slid toward the $22–$24 zone, not during upside expansion. That behavior typically reflects conviction rather than momentum chasing.

Moreover, whales accumulated above current price yet continue holding. Therefore, downside pressure appears absorbed rather than accelerated.

This activity does not guarantee an immediate reversal. However, it significantly alters the risk profile near support.

Is the descending wedge nearing resolution?

HYPE continues to compress inside a well-defined descending wedge, with price trading just above the lower boundary near $22.26.

This structure reflects weakening bearish momentum rather than strong trend continuation.

The RSI was 35.26 at press time, with its moving average near 34.12, showing oversold conditions without fresh downside expansion.

Importantly, recent candles show shallower lows compared to earlier declines from $48 and $35.92. That change suggests sellers lose control incrementally.

However, resistance remains layered. The first reaction level sits near $29.94, while a broader breakout zone aligns closer to $35.92.

Therefore, while downside exhaustion builds, confirmation still requires structure resolution. Volatility expansion now appears increasingly asymmetric toward the upside.

HYPE tightens available sell supply

Spot exchange netflows continue flashing negative, reinforcing accumulation behavior beyond price action alone.

On the 23rd of December, HYPE price recorded a net outflow of approximately -$971K, extending a broader trend of persistent withdrawals.

Earlier periods showed even deeper outflows exceeding -$30M to -$50M, highlighting heavy distribution already completed. Crucially, netflows have not flipped positive despite price weakness.

That consistency matters. When assets leave exchanges during declines, holders usually reduce immediate selling intent. Therefore, available liquid supply continues shrinking near current levels.

This dynamic does not trigger reversals instantly. However, it increases price sensitivity to demand shifts.

As a result, even modest buying pressure can produce outsized reactions once structure breaks.

Top traders lean long into uncertainty

Binance top trader positioning shows a clear long bias despite ongoing price weakness.

As of the 23rd of December, 61.65% of top trader accounts remained long, while 38.35% held short positions, producing a long/short ratio near 1.61.

This bias persisted as price traded near $24, rather than unwinding aggressively. That behavior suggests expectations of a reaction rather than continuation.

Importantly, positioning does not appear excessively crowded. Ratios remain below extreme optimism thresholds seen earlier in the trend.

Therefore, professional traders show controlled confidence rather than blind conviction.

When combined with whale accumulation, this positioning supports the idea that downside risk now faces increasing resistance near support.

HYPE funding resets as leverage pressure fades

Hyperliquid’s OI-Weighted Funding Rate reflected a clear cooldown in speculative positioning. At the latest reading, funding sat near 0.0047%, remaining slightly positive without spiking.

Earlier periods showed sharp negative dips below -0.02%, signaling forced unwinds.

That phase now appears complete. Current funding stability suggests leverage has reset rather than flipped aggressively bearish.

This balance matters because it reduces liquidation-driven volatility. Moreover, neutral funding allows spot flows to dictate price direction more cleanly.

Therefore, any breakout attempt from the descending wedge may develop without heavy derivative friction. In many historical setups, such resets precede structural reversals rather than continuation.

In summary, HYPE price sits at a critical inflection zone where accumulation, falling exchange supply, stabilizing leverage, and wedge compression converge.

While confirmation still matters, conditions increasingly favor a relief-driven reversal rather than renewed downside acceleration.


Final Thoughts

  • Whale accumulation and falling exchange supply reduce downside pressure near key support.
  • Cooling leverage and wedge compression increase the probability of a relief-driven move.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why do whales accumulate Hyperliquid (HYPE) during the dip rather than the rally?

AWhales accumulate during the dip because it reflects conviction and a long-term strategy, rather than chasing short-term momentum. Their aggressive buying as the price slid toward the $22–$24 zone suggests they believe the asset is undervalued at those levels.

QWhat is the significance of the descending wedge pattern mentioned for HYPE's price?

AThe descending wedge pattern reflects weakening bearish momentum, not a strong trend continuation. It suggests that sellers are incrementally losing control, and a breakout from this structure is increasingly likely to be to the upside.

QHow do negative netflows from spot exchanges impact the available supply of HYPE?

APersistent negative netflows, where more HYPE is withdrawn from exchanges than deposited, indicate that holders are moving their assets into custody, reducing the immediate selling pressure and tightening the available liquid supply on the market.

QWhat does the positioning of Binance's top traders reveal about market sentiment towards HYPE?

AAs of December 23rd, 61.65% of top trader accounts were long on HYPE, showing a clear long bias despite price weakness. This suggests professional traders expect a price reaction and reversal rather than a continued downtrend.

QWhat does a neutral funding rate indicate for Hyperliquid's market, according to the article?

AA neutral funding rate near 0.0047% indicates that speculative leverage has reset and stabilized. This reduces the risk of liquidation-driven volatility and allows spot market flows to dictate price direction more cleanly, often preceding a structural reversal.

Related Reads

Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

On July 4th, Doubao and Tongyi Qianwen announced the impending shutdown of their user-created "AI Agent" features. Doubao confirmed its agent feature will be taken offline on July 15, directing users to ByteDance's CatBox app for similar needs. On the same day, Tongyi Qianwen notified users, specifying that personalized interactive agents and user-built agent functions will cease on July 10, with all agent features and services completely deactivated by July 15. After this date, access to agent configurations and historical chat records will be lost. This adjustment impacts core user scenarios like role-playing, personal assistants, and vertical tool agents. The shutdown date coincides with the official implementation of China's "Interim Measures for the Administration of Artificial Intelligence Human-like Interactive Services" on July 15. The new regulations impose strict rules on "human-like emotional interaction services," requiring platforms to implement measures like anti-addiction systems, minor verification, and content moderation. This move is widely seen as a proactive step by the platforms to align with regulatory timelines and mitigate compliance risks. Additionally, commercial challenges are a key driver. Analysis suggests that casual, human-like chat agents generate high-frequency, low-value interactions, leading to high computational costs with poor monetization. As the AI application market shifts from user growth to proving value, sustaining such "high-cost, low-efficiency" user-generated content becomes difficult. Both platforms have outlined transition plans. Doubao will allow data viewing and self-backup for a period after shutdown, with data scheduled for permanent deletion by October 15. Tongyi Qianwen similarly advised users to save important content via copying or screenshots before the deadline. This strategic retreat from C-end agent features signals a broader market shift. Compliance capability and sustainable business models are replacing user scale and feature richness as the new core competitive dimensions. Tongyi Qianwen's recent move to fully open its Agent and Skill platforms to third-party enterprises and developers further underscores a strategic pivot from low-value C-end services to high-value B-end enterprise scenarios.

marsbit49m ago

Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

marsbit49m ago

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

In 2026, OpenAI's Codex saw explosive growth, with weekly active users surging over 5x to 5 million since January, driven largely by the February launch of its desktop app. Codex desktop lead Andrew Ambrosino explains key shifts behind its evolution. A core change is the inversion of development costs: implementation is now cheap, while curation and taste—judging which of many AI-generated prototypes is valuable—have become the new scarcities. Ambrosino defines taste as a blend of aesthetics, systems thinking, direction, and semantic coherence in interaction. He notes AI still struggles with design because evaluating it requires human cultural context and abstract reasoning about how components relate—capabilities beyond current models. Timing is critical: the same Codex app would have failed months earlier; success hinges on the model's capabilities at launch. Roles are blurring within his team, with engineers, designers, and PMs overlapping significantly. However, Ambrosino cautions against eliminating specialized roles entirely, as each field retains deep expertise. On AI-assisted development, the focus has shifted from measuring code written by AI to distinguishing between supervised and unsupervised generation. A current challenge is teaching models to simplify code, not just add complexity. The merger of Codex and ChatGPT stems from observed user behavior: non-developers adopted Codex for general knowledge work despite its developer-centric interface. This revealed a collapsing boundary between specialized tools and universal assistants. The vision is a "home base" that orchestrates tasks across external professional tools (like Excel or Premiere Pro) via connectors, rather than rebuilding everything internally. An internal example showed Codex helping edit video by interacting with Premiere Pro's files and even writing a plugin for it. The future direction is a unified, extensible platform that serves as a central hub for automating and managing work across any specialized tool the user employs.

marsbit59m ago

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片