Vitalik Updates Ethereum Roadmap: From Merge to 'Lean Refactoring', with STARK, AI, and Privacy Reshaping the Technical Foundation

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-11Last updated on 2026-08-11

Abstract

Vitalik Buterin has updated Ethereum's long-term roadmap, outlining a major shift from the post-Merge evolution toward a "Lean Ethereum" vision. The update builds on the 2023 framework but reorders priorities and introduces new concepts. Key continuations include improving consensus (single-slot finality), scaling data availability (larger blobs), simplifying light client verification with SNARKs/STARKs, and protocol simplification. Major adjustments involve significantly prioritizing quantum resistance due to heightened perceived threats, while deprioritizing items like VDFs and some EVM improvements. Technical replacements are planned, such as moving from Verkle trees to a unified Binary Tree and eventually PBTs, and rethinking state management with "New State Types." Notable new additions are: 1. Making **privacy a top-tier priority**, aiming to build it natively into the protocol. 2. **Radical scaling under post-quantum conditions**, using techniques like leanSPHINCS signatures and zkzk frames. 3. **Protocol "Lean-ification" and formal verification**, leveraging modern AI tools to make full formal verification feasible. 4. Exploring **Blob and Gas futures** for future capacity. 5. Developing **Native Rollups**, deeply integrating rollup capabilities into the protocol. 6. **Reimagining the EVM's future**, potentially exposing a simpler, modern instruction set (e.g., leanISA or RISC-V), with EVM becoming a compatibility layer. The core philosophy shifts toward specializ...

Author: Blue Fox Notes

This long post by Vitalik can be considered an updated version of the future Ethereum roadmap. It builds upon the classic 2023 roadmap (Merge → Surge → Scourge → Verge → Purge → Splurge), overlaying it with the current Strawmap (the 'strawman roadmap' maintained by the Ethereum Foundation).

The new roadmap shows us the vast and immense panorama of Ethereum's future engineering.

Simply put, the overall direction remains largely the same, but with today's development, the priorities and implementation paths have changed significantly. Furthermore, several new elements that didn't exist in 2023 have emerged.

Parts that are still continuing:

• Continued improvement of the consensus layer (single-slot finality, support for more validators, etc.)

• Data availability scaling (continuing to increase blob size)

• Light client verification becoming easier (using SNARK/STARK proofs)

• Protocol simplification, cleaning up historical technical debt

These things will still be worked on, but they have been re-prioritized, and some have found new implementation methods.

Main adjustments:

Most importantly, quantum security has been significantly moved forward. Previously a low priority, it is now a high priority.

The reason is that the perceived real-world threat from quantum computers has become much stronger than in 2023.

Downgraded technical parts:

• VDFs (Verifiable Delay Functions) are essentially marginalized

• Many pure EVM improvements have also been downgraded

Replaced technical parts:

• Verkle Trees → Unified Binary Trees → Ultimately moving towards PBT (a more optimal structure)

• State Expiry → New State Types, a completely different state management paradigm to better support scaling.

Finally, the new parts (not present in the previous roadmap)

This is also the part Vitalik finds most noteworthy:

First, privacy becomes one of the highest priorities.

It is to be directly written into the core design. This includes keyed nonces, mechanisms related to FOCIL, lean privacy pools, wormholes, etc. The ultimate goal is to make privacy a native protocol capability, upon which the application layer can build and optimize.

Second, aggressive scaling (under post-quantum assumptions)

Using leanSPHINCS signatures + aggregation, and zkzk frames (zero-knowledge framework within zero-knowledge framework). The idea is to ensure scalability does not degrade even after a full transition to post-quantum cryptography.

Third, specification 'Leanification' + Formal Verification

Writing the protocol cleaner and simpler, facilitating complete formal verification. Vitalik explicitly stated: Comprehensive formal verification has now become feasible primarily because of modern AI tools.

This is an important underlying change; protocol complexity is now being actively kept low and cannot be allowed to grow increasingly complex.

Fourth, Blob and Gas Futures

Pre-committing to/marketing future capacity.

Fifth, Native Rollups

SNARK technology has now matured to the point where deep integration of Rollup capabilities into the protocol itself is no longer just an idea.

(This is very important for L1/L2 integration)

Sixth, The Future of the EVM is Reopened

The protocol may in the future expose a simpler, more modern instruction set (current candidates are leanISA or RISC-V).

The EVM could become an intermediate representation (IR) running on top of these new instruction sets, not forever hardcoded into the protocol core. This means future developers might directly use more efficient instruction sets, with the EVM becoming a compatibility layer.

Two core ideas behind the above technical roadmap:

First, no longer attempting to infinitely scale 'all Ethereum activities'.

It will design specialized mechanisms with certain restricted properties but more suitable for scaling, specifically handling today's heaviest loads (transfers, swaps) and tomorrow's heaviest loads (privacy protocols).

Trading specialization for higher scalability.

Second, treating recursive STARK and AI-assisted formal verification as truly first-class infrastructure.

A primitive called 'aggregate to union verified dependencies' is expected to be used simultaneously in three places: the execution layer (EL), consensus layer (CL), and data layer (DL).

This kind of cross-layer reuse necessitates formal verification for safety, which in turn relies on modern AI. This is a deep 'bet'.

In summary,

Ethereum is moving from the 'second generation after Merge' towards a third-generation overhaul (Lean Ethereum).

Almost every major component will be replaced or rewritten:

For example, verification becomes recursive STARK, cryptography becomes fully post-quantum, privacy becomes a native goal, the protocol itself is proactively simplified to support formal verification, while scalability is greatly enhanced through specialized mechanisms and Native Rollups.

The ultimate goals to achieve are:

Quantum security + Privacy first + Security + Decentralization + Highly scalable under the conditions of all the above + Maintaining leanness.

In short, it's not minor fixes, but rather a systematic refactoring, arguably the largest engineering push in the entire crypto space.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two core ideas guiding Ethereum's new technical roadmap according to the article?

A1) No longer trying to scale 'all Ethereum activities' infinitely, but designing specialized mechanisms with limited properties that are more suitable for scaling to handle today's heaviest loads and tomorrow's loads like privacy protocols, using specialization to achieve higher scalability. 2) Treating recursive STARKs and AI-assisted formal verification as true first-class infrastructure, enabling cross-layer reuse of components through formal verification, which itself relies on modern AI tools.

QWhat new area has become one of the highest priorities in the updated Ethereum roadmap?

APrivacy has become one of the highest priorities. The goal is to build privacy directly into the core design, including mechanisms like keyed nonces, FOCIL, lean privacy pools, and wormholes, aiming to make privacy a protocol-native capability upon which application layers can build and optimize.

QHow has the approach to the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) changed in the new roadmap?

AThe future of the EVM has been reopened. The protocol may expose a simpler, more modern instruction set in the future. The EVM could become an intermediate representation (IR) running on top of these new instruction sets, acting as a compatibility layer, rather than being permanently hard-coded into the protocol core.

QWhy has quantum safety been significantly prioritized in the updated roadmap compared to 2023?

ABecause the perceived real-world threat from quantum computers has become much stronger in recent years compared to 2023, prompting a need to advance quantum-resistant cryptography to a high-priority status.

QWhat is the significance of 'Native Rollups' in the new technical direction?

ANative Rollups signify the deep integration of Rollup capabilities into the protocol itself, made feasible by the maturity of SNARK technology. This is very important for L1/L2 integration, moving beyond separate Layer 2 solutions towards a more unified, protocol-native scaling architecture.

Related Reads

Ex-OpenAI Post-Training VP Responds to Terence Tao: Saying AI Is Ruining Math Might Underestimate AI Too Much

Former OpenAI Training VP Liam Fedus responded to mathematician Terence Tao’s concern that AI may undermine mathematics, arguing it is underestimating AI's potential. Tao and 25 Fields Medalists had warned that the current AI focus on solving problems risks overshadowing the deeper goals of mathematical understanding, knowledge accumulation, and training new researchers. While agreeing on the importance of conceptual insight, Fedus believes future AI could evolve beyond just providing answers to also generate valuable insights, propose new conceptual frameworks, and act as a collaborative research partner. He draws a parallel to AlphaGo, which advanced human chess understanding despite not explaining its moves. Recent AI advances, such as OpenAI’s progress on the Erdős unit distance conjecture and the Navier–Stokes equations, have sparked debates about authorship, attribution, and how AI-generated knowledge can be integrated into the mathematical community. Major mathematical societies like the American Mathematical Society and the London Mathematical Society emphasize that AI should serve as a powerful tool to aid human understanding and discovery, not replace the human role in posing questions and creating new concepts. The Clay Mathematics Institute stresses that any AI-derived solution must undergo thorough peer review and contribute to the broader mathematical framework. The core question is not whether AI will ruin mathematics, but how the mathematical community can validate, interpret, and incorporate machine-generated insights into the enduring human pursuit of knowledge.

marsbit30m ago

Ex-OpenAI Post-Training VP Responds to Terence Tao: Saying AI Is Ruining Math Might Underestimate AI Too Much

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片