VIRTUAL eyes $1.33 – Why traders must watch THIS level next

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

The crypto AI sector has seen significant losses over the past week, with Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) declining by 15.71%. Despite the drop, technical analysis suggests this retracement may present a buying opportunity. VIRTUAL retraced toward the key demand zone of $0.73–$0.76, as anticipated. Although short-term momentum appears bearish—with price below key moving averages and negative capital flow—the early January breakout above $0.73 and $1.05 indicated bullish shift. As long as the token holds above the $0.758 retracement level, traders may consider buying, targeting $1.19 and $1.33. Exchange netflows have mostly favored sellers, but price action remains the more reliable indicator.

The crypto AI sector tokens have taken a beating over the past week. CoinMarketCap data revealed that this sector’s leading tokens have all registered sizeable losses over the past week.

Except for Story [IP] (-7.53%), the top ten tokens within this sector have noted double-digit percentage losses, with Artificial Superintelligence Alliance [FET] the lowest at -16.84%.

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] was not performing much better, recording a 15.71% dip over the past week. Yet, from a technical analysis perspective, this pullback is welcome.

A buying opportunity in sight?

The 1-day timeframe saw a deep retracement after the swift rally to $1.19 made in the first week of January. In a report earlier this month, AMBCrypto had highlighted this retracement toward $0.75 as a likelihood.

Back then, the $0.73-$0.76 area was seen as a key demand zone. This remained true at present, though the short-term momentum and recent capital flows painted a bearish picture.

The price sank below the 20 and 50-day moving averages, and the CMF had moved below -0.05 to signal heavy capital flows out of the market.

Exchange flows shake bullish belief

Apart from the technical indicators, the exchange netflows metric also appeared to favor the sellers. Over the past six months, the exchange flows (7DMA) have been predominantly positive. There were brief periods of outflows, such as August, November, and a couple of days ago.

The bearish argument was that holders continued to send VIRTUAL tokens to exchanges to exit their positions. It signaled a lack of market conviction.

Traders must buy now

While the netflows and indicators might be persuasive, the price action was more reliable. The VIRTUAL breakout in early January, past the $0.73 and $1.05 swing levels from the multi-month downtrend, represented bullish intent.

Until the 78.6% retracement level at $0.758 is ceded to the bears, swing traders can maintain this bullish bias. The deep retracement represented a buying opportunity, targeting $1.19 and $1.33.


Final Thoughts

  • The VIRTUAL structure has shifted bullishly after the early January rally, and it remains bullish.
  • The token established a short-term range between $0.8 and $0.88 over the past week that lower timeframe traders can keep an eye on.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price trend of VIRTUAL and the broader crypto AI sector tokens over the past week?

AThe crypto AI sector tokens have taken a significant beating, with most top tokens registering double-digit losses. VIRTUAL specifically recorded a 15.71% dip over the past week.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what key price area is identified as a demand zone for VIRTUAL?

AThe $0.73-$0.76 area is identified as a key demand zone, with the 78.6% retracement level at $0.758 being a critical level to watch.

QWhat do the exchange netflows for VIRTUAL indicate about market sentiment?

AThe exchange netflows metric, which has been predominantly positive over the past six months, indicates that holders are sending tokens to exchanges to exit their positions, signaling a lack of market conviction and favoring sellers.

QDespite the bearish indicators, why does the article suggest that traders should consider buying VIRTUAL?

AThe article suggests buying because the price action, specifically the breakout past $0.73 and $1.05 in early January, showed bullish intent. The current deep retracement is seen as a buying opportunity with targets of $1.19 and $1.33, as long as the price holds above $0.758.

QWhat is the short-term trading range that lower timeframe traders should watch for VIRTUAL?

AThe token has established a short-term range between $0.8 and $0.88 over the past week that lower timeframe traders can keep an eye on.

Related Reads

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit22m ago

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit22m ago

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbit24m ago

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbit24m ago

Bitwise: Bullish on Bitcoin's Performance in the Second Half of the Year, AI and Regulation Will Spark a New Altcoin Season

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan and Research Lead Ryan Rasmussen express strong bullish sentiment on Bitcoin's long-term prospects, suggesting that its $1 million price target may be too conservative. They argue Bitcoin serves a dual role: as digital gold and a potential global settlement asset, especially amid declining trust in traditional monetary systems. Despite a weak Q1 2026 where nearly all crypto assets and prices saw double-digit declines, the analysts remain optimistic due to strong forward-looking catalysts, including institutional adoption via Bitcoin ETFs from major firms like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. Geopolitical instability, such as Iran’s mention of using Bitcoin for international payments, increases the value of Bitcoin’s “out-of-the-money call option” as a non-political, global settlement currency. This enhances its appeal beyond a mere store of value. . Additionally, Hougan highlights that a clearer regulatory token framework under current SEC leadership, combined with AI efficiency gains and high-performance blockchains, could fuel a new “altseason” by late 2026. This may lead to a wave of legitimate, value-capturing token projects, unlike the earlier ICO boom. . Bitwise also announced an Avalanche ETF, citing its unique architecture and rapid growth in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, which has surged 10x to nearly $30 billion in two years. The firm believes Layer 1 blockchains are still early in their growth cycle, with significant potential ahead.

marsbit1h ago

Bitwise: Bullish on Bitcoin's Performance in the Second Half of the Year, AI and Regulation Will Spark a New Altcoin Season

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片