U.S. Treasury Urges Congress to Allow Crypto Platforms to Freeze Suspicious Funds

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

The U.S. Treasury is urging Congress to pass legislation that would grant cryptocurrency platforms the legal authority to temporarily freeze funds linked to suspicious or illegal activities. This proposal, tied to the GENIUS Act, aims to address a current gap where exchanges can detect but not always legally halt such transactions. A legal framework would protect platforms from lawsuits and enable quicker action to prevent funds from being moved or laundered. While intended to improve cooperation with law enforcement, the proposal raises concerns about transparency and legal complexities, such as disclosure requirements to users and constraints due to ongoing investigations. The move reflects broader efforts to regulate digital assets amid ongoing legislative debates.

The U.S. government is asking Congress to consider a new rule that allows crypto platforms to temporarily freeze suspicious funds linked to illegal activities. This proposal comes from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which is connected to the GENIUS Act. This act focuses on the tools to protect against financial crimes involving digital assets.

Reason behind the Treasury’s need for this law

Right now, crypto exchanges can detect suspicious transactions through blockchain tracking tools, but they do not always have a clear legal authority to freeze them. This creates problems, like if the exchanges let the transaction continue, then the funds could disappear quickly, and if the exchanges freeze the funds without legal protection, they could face lawsuits. This law creates a legal framework allowing exchanges to temporarily hold suspicious assets.

If the law receives approval, crypto exchanges could halt transfers before criminals shift their funds across multiple wallets. Supporters say this would strengthen cooperation between crypto companies and law enforcement agencies. The temporary freeze could stop money from being stolen or illegal funds from being used within minutes.

Legal experts say that the proposal raises several complicated issues. Andrew Rossow, who was a public affairs attorney, explained that the banks already have limited powers to delay suspicious transactions. Another concern involves transparency rules. If a platform freezes someone’s assets, it may have to disclose the freeze to the users. At the same time, financial reporting laws may prevent the platform from explaining the investigations.

President Donald Trump has been urging Congress to move faster on the digital assets legislation as regulators and banks argue over how the industry should be governed. This treasury proposal aims to close a major gap by giving exchanges clear authority to freeze suspicious funds.

Highlighted Crypto News:

XRP Faces Critical Test: Recovery Ahead or Extended Bear Market?

TagsBlockchainCryptoUS Treasury

Related Questions

QWhat is the U.S. Treasury asking Congress to allow crypto platforms to do?

AThe U.S. Treasury is asking Congress to allow crypto platforms to temporarily freeze suspicious transactions linked to illegal activities.

QWhat is the name of the act that this Treasury proposal is connected to?

AThe proposal is connected to the GENIUS Act, which focuses on tools to protect against financial crimes involving digital assets.

QWhat is the main problem the new law aims to solve for crypto exchanges?

AThe main problem is that crypto exchanges can detect suspicious transactions but currently lack clear legal authority to freeze them, which creates a risk of funds disappearing or the exchanges facing lawsuits.

QAccording to the article, what is one potential benefit if this law is approved?

AIf approved, the law would allow crypto exchanges to halt transfers before criminals can move funds across multiple wallets, potentially stopping stolen or illegal funds from being used within minutes.

QWhat is one concern that legal experts have raised about this proposal?

ALegal experts are concerned about transparency rules, as a platform that freezes assets may have to disclose the freeze to users, while financial reporting laws may simultaneously prevent it from explaining the ongoing investigations.

Related Reads

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit12m ago

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit12m ago

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit40m ago

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit40m ago

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片