‘Undisclosed voting power’ – ACI’s exit claim sends AAVE tumbling 10%

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a key service provider, announced its exit from the Aave ecosystem, citing Aave Labs' "undisclosed voting power" and aggressive control as reasons. This follows a similar departure by BGD Labs last month. The ongoing governance crisis, which began with accusations of Aave Labs seizing DAO revenue, deepened after a controversial $50 million proposal passed narrowly. In response, Aave's CEO stated the protocol remains unaffected. However, investor confidence wavered, causing a 10% drop in the AAVE token price. Data shows major whales reduced their holdings by nearly half since January, reflecting growing concerns over centralization and governance.

The Aave governance crisis continues to spook service providers and investors alike.

On Tuesday, the 3rd of March, Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), another key service provider, announced it will exit the Aave ecosystem in four months.

Like BGD Labs, which made a similar move last month, ACI cited Aave Labs’ aggressive control and lack of transparency as the reasons for the exit.

“There is no role for an independent service provider in an environment where the largest budget recipient (Aave Labs) holds undisclosed voting power and uses it on its own proposals.”

In response, Aave Labs CEO and Founder Stani Kulechov acknowledged ACI and Marc Zeller’s contributions but maintained that their exit won’t affect the ecosystem.

“The protocol continues to operate as normal, and incentive programs are unaffected. Aave Labs will work with the DAO’s other service providers to make sure this transition is smooth for the community.”

Even so, the broader community reactions were mixed, and investor confidence appeared low.

Impact on the AAVE market

The ongoing governance crisis began in late 2025, after ACI’s Marc Zeller accused Aave Labs of stealing DAO revenue streams and brand rights.

To make amends, Aave Labs requested $50 million upfront in exchange for sharing 100% of revenue from products it built with the Aave DAO.

This Aave Labs’ proposal passed narrowly with a 52.58% majority, leaving critics such as ACI with no option but to leave.

For some analysts, the DAO has now lost control of the protocol roadmap and decision-making to Aave Labs. While others believe Aave will emerge stronger and continue to lead the lending sector, the governance rift has dented investors’ confidence in the near term.

Notably, the ACI exit update led to a nearly 10% drop in the Aave [AAVE] token price, from $127 to a low of $107 on the 3rd of March.

While the token remained within the $100-$130 price range seen since February, a closer look at whale positions revealed deeper concerns.

According to Santiment data, key whale wallets holding 1 million to 10 million AAVE tokens (purple) have reduced their exposure by nearly half since late January. They trimmed the exposure from 4.7 million AAVE to 2.58 million AAVE.


Final Summary

  • Aave service provider ACI said it will exit the ecosystem in four months, further deepening the ongoing governance rift.
  • Some investors appeared worried as key whales reduced their AAVE exposure by half in 2026.

Related Questions

QWhy did Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) announce its exit from the Aave ecosystem?

AACI cited Aave Labs' aggressive control and lack of transparency, specifically pointing to Aave Labs holding undisclosed voting power and using it on its own proposals, as the reasons for its exit.

QWhat was the immediate market impact of ACI's exit announcement on the AAVE token?

AThe announcement led to a nearly 10% drop in the AAVE token price, from $127 to a low of $107 on March 3rd.

QHow did Aave Labs' CEO, Stani Kulechov, respond to ACI's decision to leave?

AStani Kulechov acknowledged ACI and Marc Zeller's contributions but maintained that their exit would not affect the ecosystem, stating the protocol would continue to operate normally and that Aave Labs would work with other service providers to ensure a smooth transition.

QWhat did the data from Santiment reveal about whale activity prior to the announcement?

AAccording to Santiment data, key whale wallets holding 1 million to 10 million AAVE tokens had reduced their exposure by nearly half, from 4.7 million AAVE to 2.58 million AAVE, since late January.

QWhat was the catalyst that started the ongoing governance crisis in late 2025?

AThe governance crisis began after ACI's Marc Zeller accused Aave Labs of stealing DAO revenue streams and brand rights.

Related Reads

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

Recently, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," first outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's March mandate as core principles guiding its focus: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. CROPS represents Ethereum's commitment to providing foundational capabilities for user sovereignty—enabling asset ownership, identity expression, and coordination without reliance on centralized platforms or surrendering ultimate control. This framework is gaining new urgency with the rise of AI, particularly AI agents managing digital assets and automating transactions. While AI offers convenience, it risks centralizing user data, intent, and control if dependent on opaque, centralized services. Vitalik argues for "CROPS AI"—AI that is open, privacy-preserving, secure, and capable of local execution to maintain user agency. He highlights convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layers" and "CROPS AI," such as using zero-knowledge proofs for private remote LLM calls and Ethereum RPC reads, ensuring users can access services without exposing sensitive information. Ultimately, CROPS is not just an abstract ideal but a practical guide for Ethereum's development and AI integration. It addresses the critical long-term question: as digital systems grow more powerful, how can users retain control over their privacy, assets, and autonomy? In an AI-driven era, these principles may define Ethereum's enduring value—prioritizing verifiable, secure, and user-centric design over short-term optimizations like speed and cost alone.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片