‘Undisclosed voting power’ – ACI’s exit claim sends AAVE tumbling 10%

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a key service provider, announced its exit from the Aave ecosystem, citing Aave Labs' "undisclosed voting power" and aggressive control as reasons. This follows a similar departure by BGD Labs last month. The ongoing governance crisis, which began with accusations of Aave Labs seizing DAO revenue, deepened after a controversial $50 million proposal passed narrowly. In response, Aave's CEO stated the protocol remains unaffected. However, investor confidence wavered, causing a 10% drop in the AAVE token price. Data shows major whales reduced their holdings by nearly half since January, reflecting growing concerns over centralization and governance.

The Aave governance crisis continues to spook service providers and investors alike.

On Tuesday, the 3rd of March, Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), another key service provider, announced it will exit the Aave ecosystem in four months.

Like BGD Labs, which made a similar move last month, ACI cited Aave Labs’ aggressive control and lack of transparency as the reasons for the exit.

“There is no role for an independent service provider in an environment where the largest budget recipient (Aave Labs) holds undisclosed voting power and uses it on its own proposals.”

In response, Aave Labs CEO and Founder Stani Kulechov acknowledged ACI and Marc Zeller’s contributions but maintained that their exit won’t affect the ecosystem.

“The protocol continues to operate as normal, and incentive programs are unaffected. Aave Labs will work with the DAO’s other service providers to make sure this transition is smooth for the community.”

Even so, the broader community reactions were mixed, and investor confidence appeared low.

Impact on the AAVE market

The ongoing governance crisis began in late 2025, after ACI’s Marc Zeller accused Aave Labs of stealing DAO revenue streams and brand rights.

To make amends, Aave Labs requested $50 million upfront in exchange for sharing 100% of revenue from products it built with the Aave DAO.

This Aave Labs’ proposal passed narrowly with a 52.58% majority, leaving critics such as ACI with no option but to leave.

For some analysts, the DAO has now lost control of the protocol roadmap and decision-making to Aave Labs. While others believe Aave will emerge stronger and continue to lead the lending sector, the governance rift has dented investors’ confidence in the near term.

Notably, the ACI exit update led to a nearly 10% drop in the Aave [AAVE] token price, from $127 to a low of $107 on the 3rd of March.

While the token remained within the $100-$130 price range seen since February, a closer look at whale positions revealed deeper concerns.

According to Santiment data, key whale wallets holding 1 million to 10 million AAVE tokens (purple) have reduced their exposure by nearly half since late January. They trimmed the exposure from 4.7 million AAVE to 2.58 million AAVE.


Final Summary

  • Aave service provider ACI said it will exit the ecosystem in four months, further deepening the ongoing governance rift.
  • Some investors appeared worried as key whales reduced their AAVE exposure by half in 2026.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy did Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) announce its exit from the Aave ecosystem?

AACI cited Aave Labs' aggressive control and lack of transparency, specifically pointing to Aave Labs holding undisclosed voting power and using it on its own proposals, as the reasons for its exit.

QWhat was the immediate market impact of ACI's exit announcement on the AAVE token?

AThe announcement led to a nearly 10% drop in the AAVE token price, from $127 to a low of $107 on March 3rd.

QHow did Aave Labs' CEO, Stani Kulechov, respond to ACI's decision to leave?

AStani Kulechov acknowledged ACI and Marc Zeller's contributions but maintained that their exit would not affect the ecosystem, stating the protocol would continue to operate normally and that Aave Labs would work with other service providers to ensure a smooth transition.

QWhat did the data from Santiment reveal about whale activity prior to the announcement?

AAccording to Santiment data, key whale wallets holding 1 million to 10 million AAVE tokens had reduced their exposure by nearly half, from 4.7 million AAVE to 2.58 million AAVE, since late January.

QWhat was the catalyst that started the ongoing governance crisis in late 2025?

AThe governance crisis began after ACI's Marc Zeller accused Aave Labs of stealing DAO revenue streams and brand rights.

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手51m ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手51m ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1h ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片