Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

Donald Trump, described as the world's largest oil trader, used a post on Truth Social to claim "very good, productive" talks with Iran and announce a five-day pause in strikes on Iranian energy facilities. Minutes after the March 23 post, S&P 500 futures surged 2.7%, and Brent crude plummeted 13% to below $100, boosting U.S. stock market value by an estimated $1.7 trillion. Iran denied any talks, suggesting Trump manipulates oil prices weekly. Suspicious trading spikes occurred 15 minutes before the post, raising insider trading concerns, though regulators declined to comment. This mirrors a pattern: in 2020, Trump brokered OPEC+ cuts to raise prices, benefiting oil executives who funded his campaigns. Academic research confirms his social media moves oil markets. Now, his sons profit from military contracts: Donald Jr. invested in drone firms like Unusual Machines, which secured Army deals after his father’s election. With the Iran war boosting drone demand, the family benefits whether oil rises (more contracts) or falls (political wins). Trump’s power over oil—using policy, not money—makes him a unique market force.

Author: David, Deep Tide TechFlow

How much is a single post really worth?

At 7:05 AM EST on March 23, Trump posted a message in all caps on Truth Social. The gist of it was: The US and Iran had "very good, productive conversations" over the past two days, and he had ordered a pause on strikes against Iranian power plants and energy facilities for five days.

This post was made before the US stock market opened. But the futures market is real-time.

Within minutes, Dow Jones futures surged over 1000 points, and S&P 500 futures rose 2.7%. Brent crude plummeted from $113 per barrel straight down to $98, a drop of over 13%.

A reporter from the renowned foreign magazine Fortune later calculated that from the time the post was made until the market digested the news, the total market capitalization of US stocks increased by approximately $1.7 trillion.

If you were an ordinary trader and posted a message on social media about oil supply, causing global oil prices to crash by 13%, regulators would likely be at your door within 24 hours.

But if you are the President of the United States, this is called diplomacy.

Then Iran said: We haven't spoken to him.

Iran's state news agency quoted a security official stating there had been no direct or indirect dialogue between Tehran and Washington. Iranian scholar Seyed Mohammad Marandi wrote more bluntly on X:

"Every week when the market opens, Trump posts these kinds of statements to drive down oil prices. This time he even precisely set the five-day deadline to coincide with the close of the energy market trading week."

The news traveled back to the US, and the market gains were nearly halved. But by the close, the Dow was up 631 points, and Brent crude settled at $99.94, the first time it had fallen below $100 since March 11. This means the market chose to believe Trump's version, at least half of it.

One post, one hour, trillions of dollars swinging back and forth.

This is less the President making a diplomatic statement and more the world's largest oil trader placing an order.

And the tools in his hands aren't futures contracts; they are the US military and Truth Social. Other traders use money to go long or short; he uses the switch for war.

According to CNBC, about 15 minutes before the post was made, around 6:50 AM New York time, there was a simultaneous abnormal surge in trading volume for both S&P 500 futures and crude oil futures.

In the thin liquidity of the pre-market session, this sudden, isolated spike in volume was very conspicuous.

Fifteen minutes later, the post was made, oil prices crashed, and stock indices soared. This means that whoever acted at 6:50 made money after 7:05. In the commodities market, building a position precisely ahead of major news is one of the most classic forms of insider trading.

Image source: CNBC, S&P 500 pre-market trading volume spike

In April of last year, when Trump's反复变卦 (repeated flip-flopping) on tariff policy caused severe market volatility, Congressman Adam Schiff publicly questioned: Who knew what the President was going to say before he posted? No answer was given that time.

This time, CNBC contacted the SEC and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The response from both institutions was identical: No comment.

And this isn't the first time. Looking back, Trump moving oil prices with his mouth has been going on for nearly a decade.

The Mouth Business

Trump started talking about oil prices on social media as early as 2011, back when he wasn't president. Railing against OPEC for manipulating the market was a regular part of his content. But complaining is one thing; a real estate developer grumbling on Twitter is different from manipulating oil prices.

What truly turned him from a "commentator" into a "trader" was a deal in 2020.

Early that year, the COVID-19 pandemic erupted, the global economy ground to a halt, and oil demand fell off a cliff. Making matters worse, Saudi Arabia and Russia started a price war, increasing production to snatch market share from each other. Oil prices plunged to around $20 per barrel. US shale companies were collapsing in droves; the entire industry was in mourning.

By normal logic, low oil prices are good for consumers—gas is cheaper. A president who cares about his constituents should be happy about it.

But Trump did the opposite.

He invited a room full of oil company CEOs to the White House for a meeting. Then he personally called Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Russian President Vladimir Putin, persuading them to join OPEC in massive production cuts. The goal was singular:

To push oil prices back up.

Subsequently, he posted a tweet hinting that a production cut agreement was imminent. That day, WTI crude surged 25%, marking the largest single-day gain in history.

Why save oil prices? Because those shale company owners on the verge of bankruptcy were his biggest political donors.

According to public reports, oil tycoon Harold Hamm saw his personal fortune evaporate by $3 billion in a few days during the price crash and immediately lobbied Trump to intervene. NBC's headline at the time was blunt: "Trump wanted lower oil prices, now he's consulting with oil execs on how to raise them."

The essence of this deal was: Global consumers paid for higher oil prices, the profits flowed to his political donors, and he himself harvested the next round of campaign funds.

If it had ended there, it could have been categorized as "political利益交换 (quid pro quo)". But Trump did something no politician would do—he publicly admitted it.

At subsequent campaign rallies, he said more than once to his supporters:

"We got oil prices too low, had to go save the oil companies. I called OPEC, I called Russia, I called Saudi Arabia, told them the price has to come up."

The audience erupted in applause.

Image source: Visual Capitalist

In 2023, the academic journal "Energy Policy" published a paper reviewing all of Trump's social media posts related to oil from his announcement of candidacy in 2015 to his account suspension in 2021.

The conclusion: His tweets did have a quantifiable impact on WTI crude futures prices and significantly amplified speculative behavior in the market.

In other words, academia used data to confirm something all traders already knew: This man's mouth could move global oil prices. And the 2020 story proved that he not only could, he was willing, and his motive wasn't national interest, but his own network of interests.

From his first term to now, Trump's oil trading tools have upgraded. Twitter became Truth Social,骂OPEC (cursing OPEC) became pausing bombing Iran...

But the logic has never changed: Use the information advantage and policy power unique to the presidency to create price fluctuations in the world's largest commodity market.

From Mouth to Hand

For the past decade, Trump has earned "influence" money in the oil market.

With a word, others profit, others lose, and he himself reaps political capital. But in 2026, the nature of this business began to change.

In early March this year, the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg reported the same piece of news: Trump's two sons, Donald Jr. and Eric Trump, are investing in a military drone company called Powerus.

Donald Jr. is also a shareholder and member of the advisory board of drone component company Unusual Machines, holding approximately 330,000 shares worth about $4 million.

He joined this company in November 2024, just weeks after his father won the election. He had no prior experience in the drone or defense industry.

Unusual Machines subsequently secured a contract with the US Army to produce 3,500 drone motors, with the military indicating an additional 20,000 components would be ordered in 2026.

Donald Jr. is also a partner at venture capital firm 1789 Capital. According to Financial Times statistics, in 2025 alone, at least four portfolio companies of this VC received defense contracts from the Trump administration, totaling over $735 million.

Forbes estimated Donald Jr.'s personal net worth was around $50 million before his father's inauguration in January 2025; by the end of the year, it had sextupled.

Then, his father launched a war against Iran on February 28, 2026.

Drones are the signature weapon of this war. According to the New York Times, both sides are using drones extensively, with a unit cost only a fraction of traditional missiles. The Pentagon is advancing an $11 billion procurement plan aiming to deploy over 200,000 US-made attack drones by 2027.

A few days after the war started, his son Eric Trump posted on X: "Drones are the future."

The conflict of interest is obvious. A president's son enters the defense industry after his father takes office, invests in companies that get contracts from his father's administration, and his father is fighting a war that heavily uses the products of these companies.

It's not just oil anymore; the Trump family's business has expanded to the war itself. Oil is the money he makes with his mouth; drones are the money his son makes with his hands.

Today is the first day of the pause in strikes. In five days, either negotiations yield results, the Strait of Hormuz reopens to traffic, and oil prices continue to fall; or nothing is achieved, Iran continues to blockade the strait, and everything reverts to the way it was.

The world's largest oil trader has issued the market a five-day option. The strike price is war or peace; no one knows.

But one thing is certain: If oil prices rise, his son's drone company gets more orders; if oil prices fall, he wins again on Truth Social.

No matter the outcome, he won't lose money.

Related Questions

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to Trump's March 23rd post on Truth Social about pausing strikes on Iran?

AWithin minutes, the Dow Jones futures rose over 1000 points, S&P 500 futures gained 2.7%, and Brent crude oil plummeted from $113 to $98 per barrel, a drop of over 13%.

QAccording to the article, what classic form of market manipulation was suggested by unusual trading activity 15 minutes before Trump's post?

AThe article suggests it was a classic form of insider trading, as there was an isolated surge in trading volume for S&P 500 and crude oil futures 15 minutes before the post, allowing those traders to profit from the subsequent market move.

QWhat was the primary motivation cited for Trump administration's intervention to raise oil prices in 2020, contrary to the benefit of consumers?

AThe primary motivation was to benefit his political donors, specifically oil company executives whose businesses were failing due to low prices, in exchange for future campaign funding.

QHow has the nature of the Trump family's financial interest in geopolitical events evolved, as described in the article?

AIt has evolved from leveraging presidential influence to move oil markets for political capital ('influence money') to direct financial investments, specifically his sons' stakes in military drone companies that subsequently received government contracts amid a war that increased demand for their products.

QWhat does the article imply is the ultimate outcome for Trump regardless of whether the price of oil rises or falls after his 5-day ultimatum?

AThe article implies he will not lose money; if oil prices fall, he claims a victory on Truth Social, and if oil prices rise, his son's drone companies benefit from increased military contracts.

Related Reads

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbit13m ago

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbit13m ago

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit1h ago

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit1h ago

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbit2h ago

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片