Trump pushes for legislative ‘compromise’ on crypto bill: Here’s how

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-29Last updated on 2026-01-29

Abstract

President Trump is pushing for a compromise between crypto firms and banks to advance the stalled crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. A key sticking point is stablecoin yields, which led Coinbase to withdraw support and caused a Senate Banking Committee vote to be postponed. The White House has called a meeting on February 2nd to bring both sides back to the negotiating table. Industry groups express optimism, while the crypto super PAC Fairshake has amassed $193 million to support pro-crypto candidates in the upcoming midterm elections.

U.S President Donald Trump appears keen on advancing the stalled crypto market structure bill to the finish line.

According to Reuters, the White House will meet the crypto firms and banks on the 2nd of February to seek a ‘compromise’ on the crypto bill. The main issue will be stablecoin yields, which have pitted the two sectors and stalled the bill’s momentum.

The bill, also known as the CLARITY Act, faced a setback in mid-January after Coinbase withdrew its support. The exchange cited ‘too many issues’, including a direct ban on stablecoin rewards and tokenized securities.

This forced the previously planned Senate Banking Committee vote on the draft bill to be postponed. And the two sectors have been clashing ever since.

In fact, even the White House was reportedly unhappy with the turn of events and called on Coinbase to come back to the negotiating table.

Trump to revive crypto bill?

The Senate Banking group was further instructed to double down on affordable housing policy, putting the crypto bill on the back burner.

With a winter storm underway, a possible government shutdown looming, and the November midterms approaching, many feared the bill would stall.

However, the latest update brings renewed optimism. It signals progress toward what could become the sector’s most significant regulatory effort since the stablecoin framework, the GENIUS Act.

Commenting on the same, Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, an umbrella group invited to the White House meeting, which represents Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, and others, said,

“We look forward to continuing to work with policymakers across the aisle so Congress can advance lasting market structure legislation and ensure the United States remains the crypto capital of the world.”

Similarly, Cody Carbone, CEO of another crypto trade group, The Digital Chamber, hailed the White House for ‘pulling all sides to the negotiation table.’

During his 2024 campaign trail, Trump was heavily supported by crypto firms and promised regulatory clarity for the industry.

Whatever the bill’s outcome, the industry isn’t taking any chances. Crypto’s super PAC Fairshake has unveiled a $193 million war chest ahead of the November midterms. Josh Vlasto, a spokesperson for Fairshake, said,

“With the midterms approaching, we are united behind our mission with Fairshake continuing to oppose anti-crypto politicians and support pro-crypto leaders.”

Since last July, it has received $74 million in extra cash, with $25 million each from Coinbase and Ripple and $24 million from VC firm a16z.

According to analysts, Fairshake is now the second-largest Super PAC by funding, underscoring crypto’s clout in U.S. lobbying and elections.


Final Thoughts

  • Trump is reportedly pushing for a ‘compromise’ on stablecoin yield between crypto firms and banks to advance the CLARITY Act.
  • Crypto super PAC Fairshake now has $193 million for pro-crypto candidates ahead in the November U.S. elections.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main issue that has stalled the crypto market structure bill and pitted crypto firms against banks?

AThe main issue is stablecoin yields, which have caused disagreement between the two sectors and stalled the bill's momentum.

QWhy did Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act in mid-January?

ACoinbase cited 'too many issues', including a direct ban on stablecoin rewards and tokenized securities.

QWhat is the name of the crypto super PAC and how much funding does it have for the November midterms?

AThe crypto super PAC is called Fairshake, and it has a war chest of $193 million for the November midterms.

QWhich major companies and organizations are represented by the Blockchain Association, which was invited to the White House meeting?

AThe Blockchain Association represents Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, and others.

QWhat significant promise did Donald Trump make to the crypto industry during his 2024 campaign trail?

ADuring his 2024 campaign trail, Donald Trump promised regulatory clarity for the crypto industry.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit22m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit22m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit31m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit31m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit31m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片