Tracking 118 Coins Launched in 2025: 85% Are Below Their Initial Valuation at Launch

深潮Published on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

An analysis of 118 Token Generation Events (TGEs) that occurred in 2025 reveals a significant downturn in post-launch performance. The study compared each token's current fully diluted valuation (FDV) to its valuation at issuance. Key findings show that 84.7% (100 out of 118) of these assets are currently valued below their initial TGE price. This indicates that approximately 4 out of every 5 new tokens are trading at a lower valuation than at launch. The median token experienced a 71% decline in FDV (and a 67% drop in market cap) since its release. Only 15% of the tokens analyzed have maintained a valuation higher than at their TGE. The report concludes that participating in a TGE can no longer be considered a form of "early investment" under these market conditions.

Author:Ash

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

We tracked 118 Token Generation Events (TGEs) launched in 2025 and compared their current fully diluted valuation (FDV) with their valuation at issuance. The results are as follows:

  • 84.7% (100 out of 118) currently have a valuation lower than at TGE;

  • This means approximately 4 out of every 5 newly issued tokens are valued below their issuance level;

  • The median token's fully diluted valuation (FDV) has fallen by 71% since issuance (market cap down 67%);

  • Only 15% of tokens remained "green" (i.e., above issuance valuation) after TGE.

Nowadays, participating in a TGE can hardly be considered "early investment" anymore. How lamentable.

View the complete data via the link

Related Questions

QWhat percentage of the 118 tokens tracked from 2025 TGEs are currently valued below their initial valuation?

A84.7% (100 out of 118 tokens) are currently valued below their initial TGE valuation.

QHow does the median token's Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) perform compared to its issuance valuation?

AThe median token's FDV has declined by 71% since its issuance.

QWhat proportion of the tracked tokens maintained a valuation higher than their initial issuance?

AOnly 15% of the tokens remained 'green' (valued above their initial issuance valuation).

QAccording to the article, what is the current perception of participating in a Token Generation Event (TGE)?

AParticipating in a TGE is no longer considered 'early investment'.

QWhat metric, besides FDV, is mentioned to have declined for the median token since issuance?

AThe market capitalization of the median token has declined by 67% since issuance.

Related Reads

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

The Q1 2026 13F filings reveal a sharply divided picture of institutional activity in crypto assets. Sovereign wealth funds and bank capital increased exposure, while major endowment funds notably de-risked. The most significant buying came from the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala, which expanded its position in the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). JPMorgan Chase dramatically increased its IBIT exposure by 174%, with other global banks like RBC, Scotiabank, and Barclays also adding to Bitcoin ETF holdings, while using options for asymmetric protection. Conversely, the Harvard Management Company (Harvard University's endowment), once a major academic holder, cut its IBIT position by 43% and fully exited a BlackRock Ethereum ETF. The reallocated capital flowed into traditional assets like TSMC, Microsoft, and gold. Other Ivy League endowments showed varied strategies: Brown and Dartmouth maintained Bitcoin positions, with Dartmouth making a nuanced shift by moving Ethereum exposure to a staking ETF and adding a Solana staking ETF to capture yield. Hedge fund Jane Street significantly reduced Bitcoin ETF holdings, locking in profits, while Wells Fargo increased its Ethereum stake. Overall, institutions are deploying traditional capital market tactics—buying, selling, hedging, and rotating—within crypto via spot ETFs. The Q2 reports will be crucial to determine if Harvard's retreat is an outlier or the start of a broader trend among endowments.

marsbit21m ago

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

marsbit21m ago

Blockchain Capital Partner: Most People Have a Narrow Understanding of the On-Chain Economy

Author Spencer Bogart, a partner at Blockchain Capital, argues that most people have a narrow view of the on-chain economy, seeing it primarily as a faster, cheaper version of existing financial systems. While this represents a significant opportunity, he believes it's only a small part of the story. Bogart compares the current state of crypto to the early internet, where email was the obvious "faster mail" application. The truly transformative categories—like search, social media, and cloud computing—were entirely new and unimaginable beforehand. Similarly, the most profound innovations in crypto will not be incremental improvements but entirely new categories enabled by the core properties of public blockchains: atomic execution, shared global state, programmable custody, and composability. He cites the "flash loan" as a prime example of a "new verb"—a financial action structurally impossible before programmable assets and atomic settlement. It allows for uncollateralized, trustless borrowing of any size, provided repayment occurs within the same transaction, enabling novel strategies like arbitrage and collateral swaps. Bogart admits the difficulty in precisely predicting these future innovations, as human imagination tends to extrapolate from the past. He posits that the most exciting applications in ten years will be things that don't exist today and have no precedent—products only possible in a global, composable, always-on environment with programmable assets. While the exploration of this vast design space will involve many failures, the potential for transformative, category-defining breakthroughs is what makes the next decade so promising.

链捕手50m ago

Blockchain Capital Partner: Most People Have a Narrow Understanding of the On-Chain Economy

链捕手50m ago

Cloud PC Gets a Second Chance, Google/Alibaba/Microsoft Battle for Cloud AI Dominance

Google unexpectedly announced "Android Computer," a new high-end productivity-focused PC series, positioning cloud AI as its core rather than an add-on. This move signals a potential revival for the "cloud computer" concept in the AI era. The article argues that current "AI PCs" are essentially traditional Windows machines with AI features grafted on, heavily reliant on cloud AI for complex tasks due to limited local consumer-grade hardware capabilities. This reliance raises questions about the value of premium local AI hardware. Cloud computers, which struggled with latency-sensitive applications like cloud gaming, are seen as a natural fit for AI PCs due to AI's higher tolerance for response time. Google's Android Computer deeply integrates AI (powered by its Gemini model) into the OS interface, making it contextually available. Its hardware-agnostic approach (supporting both x86 and ARM chips) further underscores the shift towards cloud-centric AI. Other players are adapting: Cloud service providers like Alibaba are enhancing their AI cloud computer offerings; chipmakers (Intel, AMD) are focusing on data center AI chips; traditional PC brands are adding AI software layers; and Apple is leveraging its ecosystem and affordable hardware. Microsoft is defining AI PC standards, embedding Copilot (powered by GPT and Bing) into Windows, and also relying on cloud AI. In conclusion, Android Computer challenges the traditional PC form factor by proposing a "light local, heavy cloud" model. This approach appears promising amid rising hardware costs and local compute bottlenecks. The future PC market will involve a multifaceted competition around cloud integration, OS-level AI, and cross-device ecosystems, potentially redefining the PC as a screen and network conduit to cloud-based AI productivity.

marsbit1h ago

Cloud PC Gets a Second Chance, Google/Alibaba/Microsoft Battle for Cloud AI Dominance

marsbit1h ago

Encrypted ETF Weekly Report | Last Week, US Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Outflow $9.95 Billion; US Ethereum Spot ETF Net Outflow $255 Million

Last week, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw significant net outflows totaling $995 million over three days, with a major contribution of $317 million from BlackRock's IBIT. Their total net asset value (NAV) stands at $104.2 billion. U.S. Ethereum spot ETFs also experienced net outflows of $255 million over five days, largely from BlackRock's ETHA ($186 million out), bringing their total NAV to $12.93 billion. In Hong Kong, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a net outflow of 24.91 BTC, reducing their NAV to $323 million. Hong Kong's Ethereum spot ETFs saw no inflows, with an NAV of $68.13 million. U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF options showed increased activity, with a total nominal trading volume of $797 million and a put/call trading ratio of 1.63, indicating a bullish market sentiment. The total open interest reached $23.08 billion. Key developments include VanEck and Grayscale simultaneously filing amended proposals for BNB ETFs, signaling potential SEC review progress. Grayscale also filed for the first U.S. privacy coin ETF (Zcash). Avenir Group remains Asia's largest institutional holder of Bitcoin ETFs. 21Shares launched an actively managed crypto ETF (TKNS), and Bitwise's Hyperliquid ETF (BHYP) is set to list on the NYSE. Institutional activity varied: JPMorgan dramatically increased its Bitcoin ETF holdings (IBIT up 174%), while Jane Street significantly reduced its exposure (IBIT down 71%). Dartmouth College disclosed holdings of $7.7M in Bitcoin ETF and $3.4M in a Solana ETF.

链捕手1h ago

Encrypted ETF Weekly Report | Last Week, US Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Outflow $9.95 Billion; US Ethereum Spot ETF Net Outflow $255 Million

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片