Too busy to vote? Vitalik Buterin says AI can do it for you!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum Co-Founder, has proposed a novel solution to address low participation and centralization in DAO governance: AI-powered voting agents. Instead of requiring users to manually vote on every proposal, each user would have a personal AI model trained on their messages, opinions, and past decisions. This AI would then vote on their behalf, exactly as the user would. Buterin highlights that the current delegation model is disempowering and leads to voting power being concentrated with a few large token holders. His proposal aims to make DAOs more scalable and truly decentralized. A key aspect is ensuring user privacy and security. These AI agents would operate within secure systems like trusted execution environments, and zero-knowledge proofs could be used to protect voter identity and prevent risks like bribery or coercion. Furthermore, AI agents could automatically handle routine votes, alerting users only for important decisions, and prediction markets could be used to filter out spam proposals. In summary, this AI voting system could fundamentally transform DAO governance by increasing participation, reducing centralization, and maintaining user privacy.

What if you never had to vote in a DAO again? That’s the future Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin is imagining.

Instead of users showing up for every proposal, AI agents could step in and vote based on what you actually believe.

AI will vote, so you don’t have to

Buterin recently noted that DAO voting has a serious participation problem, and his solution sounds straight out of the future. Instead of users manually voting on every proposal, he’s proposed letting personal AI agents do the job.

The idea is that each user would have their own AI model, trained on their messages, opinions, and past decisions. This AI would then vote on DAO proposals exactly how the user would.

“Making good decisions often cannot come from a linear process of taking people’s views that are based only on their own information, and averaging them (even quadratically).”

Most people don’t have the time or expertise to vote on thousands of complex decisions. As a result, voting power often ends up concentrated with a few large token holders. Buterin stated,

“The usual solution, delegation, is disempowering”

What’s interesting is that this comes a month after Buterin ripped into DAOs for low participation and growing centralization.

A key part of the idea…

…is making sure users don’t have to give away privacy for convenience.

These AI agents would run inside secure systems, like trusted execution environments and multi-party computation. This would allow them to process sensitive information without exposing it publicly.

Source: X

To protect voter identity, Buterin suggested using zero-knowledge proofs.

This would let users prove they’re eligible to vote without revealing their wallet address or their decision. It could also reduce risks like bribery, coercion, or blindly copying large token holders.

AI agents could also automatically handle routine votes and alert users only when something important comes up.

To deal with spam proposals, prediction markets are the idea on the table. This is where AI agents would back strong proposals and ignore weak ones.


Final Summary

  • Vitalik Buterin’s AI voting proposal could change DAO governance forever.
  • If adopted widely, AI agents could make DAOs more scalable and truly decentralized.
Next: Why is Cardano’s share rising in Grayscale’s fund? Explained!
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Related Questions

QWhat problem with DAO voting does Vitalik Buterin identify, and what is his proposed solution?

AVitalik Buterin identifies that DAO voting has a serious participation problem, where most people don't have the time or expertise to vote on thousands of complex decisions, leading to centralized voting power. His solution is to have personal AI agents, trained on a user's messages, opinions, and past decisions, vote on their behalf.

QHow would the proposed AI agents protect user privacy according to the article?

AThe AI agents would run inside secure systems like trusted execution environments and multi-party computation to process sensitive information without exposing it publicly. Buterin also suggested using zero-knowledge proofs to allow users to prove they are eligible to vote without revealing their wallet address or decision.

QWhat are two potential benefits of using AI agents for DAO voting, as mentioned by Buterin?

ATwo benefits are: 1) It could reduce risks like bribery, coercion, or blindly copying large token holders. 2) AI agents could automatically handle routine votes and only alert users for important decisions, making DAOs more scalable and decentralized.

QWhat mechanism does the article suggest for dealing with spam proposals in a DAO?

AThe article suggests using prediction markets to deal with spam proposals, where AI agents would back strong proposals and ignore weak ones.

QWhat did Vitalik Buterin criticize about the 'usual solution' of delegation in DAOs?

AVitalik Buterin stated that the usual solution of delegation is 'disempowering,' as it often leads to voting power becoming concentrated with a few large token holders instead of being truly decentralized.

Related Reads

The Shutdown of Claude Mythos Revealed the True Cost of Renting AI to Me

The sudden shutdown of Claude Mythos this week starkly highlights a critical, often overlooked risk for founders: when your core capability relies entirely on someone else's platform, your fate is not in your own hands. The key question becomes: who truly owns the intelligence your product depends on? For years, the debate around open-source models focused on cost. Now, the evidence is clear: fine-tuned open-source models can achieve frontier-level quality for specific, mission-critical tasks at a fraction of the cost. However, the deeper issue is control. Relying on a third-party API is like renting; it works until the landlord changes the rules, raises the rent, or asks you to leave—as Mythos experienced. The lesson is not to stop using frontier models—they are incredible infrastructure. The goal is ownership. Ownership means starting with a powerful open-source model and shaping it around what makes your company unique: your data, workflows, domain expertise, and definition of "good." Over time, the model becomes less generic and more reflective of your business, creating durable value. The optimistic conclusion is that AI's future doesn't hinge on one superior model. There is no single frontier. The frontier includes proprietary models, models fine-tuned on company-specific knowledge, specialized models for narrow problems, and intelligent routers orchestrating model ensembles. The most interesting development is not models getting smarter, but intelligence becoming increasingly customizable. The winning companies will be those that transform intelligence into a unique, owned asset. Looking ahead, the vision is not one model dominating all, but many teams owning the part of the frontier that matters most to them.

marsbit5m ago

The Shutdown of Claude Mythos Revealed the True Cost of Renting AI to Me

marsbit5m ago

Tiger Research: U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve - Should the Market Be Happy or Disappointed?

Tiger Research analyzes the evolution of U.S. legislative efforts regarding a strategic Bitcoin reserve, concluding the market impact is limited in the short term but potentially positive long-term. The core event was a March 2025 executive order by former President Trump, which designated confiscated Bitcoin as a strategic reserve and promised not to sell existing holdings (approx. 190k BTC). As it contained no mandate to purchase new Bitcoin, the market reacted negatively, with prices dropping 5.7%. Legislative history shows a significant retreat from initial ambitions. The 2024 "BITCOIN Act" proposed mandatory purchases of 1 million BTC over five years. Reintroduced in 2025, it stalled due to high fiscal costs, concerns over dollar hegemony, and opposition from the Treasury Secretary. The current frontrunner, the 2026 "American Retirement and Monetary Advancement (ARMA) Act," is a compromise. It lacks any purchase requirement, instead focusing on consolidating existing government-held Bitcoin and legally prohibiting its sale for at least 20 years. While ARMA has higher passage odds due to bipartisan support and no purchase mandate, its immediate market effect is neutral. It eliminates potential government selling pressure but creates no new demand. The long-term significance is that formally establishing Bitcoin as a national reserve asset in law could later reignite debates on mandatory purchases. Therefore, the path to a government buyer is longer than initially priced by the market, but the directional narrative remains intact.

marsbit7m ago

Tiger Research: U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve - Should the Market Be Happy or Disappointed?

marsbit7m ago

US Stock Market Trend (June 16): SpaceX Rises 42% in Two Days, New Fed Chairman Takes Office Today

**U.S. Stocks Trend (June 16): SpaceX Soars 42% in Two Days, New Fed Chair Takes Office Today** Markets surged on Monday following former President Trump's social media announcement of a completed U.S.-Iran deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, pending a June 19 signing. The news triggered a broad risk-on rally: oil prices crashed, tech stocks soared, bond yields fell, and defensive sectors lagged. **Market Performance:** The Nasdaq jumped 3.07%, led by semiconductor stocks like Micron (+9.2%). The S&P 500 gained 1.65%, and the Dow rose 0.92% to a record high. However, the Russell 2000 small-cap index underperformed (+0.72%). SpaceX continued its hot streak, rising another 5% pre-market after disclosures of large buys by an Australian billionaire and Cathie Wood's ARK. Boeing also rallied on the transportation optimism. Conversely, energy stocks like Chevron fell over 3% on the oil price plunge, with other defensive sectors also selling off. The day's action showed a clear rotation of funds from energy/defensive plays into AI and tech narratives. **Macro & Outlook:** The VIX fear index fell 8.37%. Treasury yields declined, and WTI crude dropped over 5%. Attention now shifts to a packed schedule: the Bank of Japan is widely expected to hike rates to 1.0% on Tuesday. The Fed's June meeting concludes Wednesday, marking new Chair Wash's debut. While rates are expected to hold, his tone on stubborn inflation and the "dot plot" will be crucial for gauging the 2024 rate path. The formal Iran deal signing is set for Friday. **Trend Perspective:** While the peace deal is a genuine positive, Monday's explosive rally may have gotten ahead of itself, pricing in a swift resolution to inflation concerns. The shortened trading week faces a triple test: BoJ tightening, the Fed's policy stance, and deal implementation details. Tech and semiconductors, which led the surge, remain vulnerable to any disappointment from these key events. The real price discovery begins with the central banks' communications this week.

marsbit28m ago

US Stock Market Trend (June 16): SpaceX Rises 42% in Two Days, New Fed Chairman Takes Office Today

marsbit28m ago

Xiaohongshu's Second Great Voyage, This Time Sailing Towards AI

Xiaohongshu's Second Voyage: Navigating Towards AI Since ChatGPT's emergence, Xiaohongshu's founder Mao Wenchao has been acutely aware of AI's potential threat, recognizing that the life advice people seek from chatbots overlaps directly with his platform's core business. Founded in 2013 as a PDF shopping guide for Chinese tourists, Xiaohongshu evolved into a massive community where millions share authentic, personal experiences—from product reviews to travel tips. This vast repository of "I've tried this" human judgment became its most valuable asset. However, the rise of AI, which delivers instant answers, challenges the very need for users to sift through numerous personal notes. Fearing its treasure trove of lived experience could become mere training data for others, Xiaohongshu is proactively adapting. In 2026, it established a dedicated AI division (Dots), launched RED Skill to turn user experiences into usable AI tools, and acquired the AI search product "Diandian." Its investments now extend to AI firms like MiniMax and hardware startups, moving upstream to address needs before they even become search queries. The platform's commercialization strategy is also evolving. With a newly acquired payment license and tools like the AIPS model to track consumer decision journeys, Xiaohongshu aims to seamlessly integrate recommendations with transactions, embedding commerce within AI-generated answers. Yet, a critical tension remains. While building smarter machines to organize and leverage its human experiences, Xiaohongshu must prevent AI from drowning out the authentic, flawed, and trustworthy "I've tried this" voices that built its community. Its core challenge is to harness AI's power without letting the map—the machine's perfect, synthesized answer—replace the territory of genuine human experience. This balance between technological advancement and preserving human trust defines its current journey and its future.

marsbit1h ago

Xiaohongshu's Second Great Voyage, This Time Sailing Towards AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片