TAO hits $300-zone again, but when should traders expect next decisive move?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-21Last updated on 2026-03-21

Abstract

Bittensor (TAO) revisited the $300 resistance level after a sharp 28% rebound from a low of $242.7, though it struggled to close decisively above the key January swing high of $302.4. While the short-term structure appears bullish on lower timeframes, the RSI suggests overbought conditions and the On-Balance Volume (OBV) shows a bearish divergence, indicating weakening buying pressure. Market momentum in the AI sector has slowed, and Bitcoin’s price action around $70K is likely to influence TAO’s next move. Traders are advised to wait for clearer signals before entering positions, as neither bulls nor sellers currently hold a decisive advantage.

Bittensor [TAO] continued its stellar performance on Thursday and Friday, 19-20 March. In those two days, it registered a 28% move from the low at $242.7 to the high at $310.6.

The AI sector was an outstanding performer during the previous week. However, the sector was unable to maintain its upward momentum this week. At the same time, TAO token’s prices challenged the 1-day timeframe’s swing high at $302.4, made in January.

The bulls were unable to overcome this resistance, but their fight to drive prices higher on Thursday and Friday showed intent. It also marked a lower timeframe bullish continuation.

The long-term holder conviction in Bitcoin [BTC] was growing too as the leading crypto held on to the psychological $70k-level. This could aid TAO buyers in the short-term. Will it also allow the longer-term bear structure to be overcome?

Pitched battle at TAO’s January swing high

Source: TAO/USDT on TradingView

The relative strength of the AI sector has slowed down. As the biggest AI crypto asset, TAO’s momentum has an impact on the sector. The altcoin ran into a long-term resistance level at $302. The subsequent dip to $242 was quickly bought up.

At the time of writing, the RSI was in the overbought territory and indicated an overextended market. Moreover, the price has been unable to close a daily trading session above $302 to signify a swing structure shift.

Interestingly, the daily trading volume has been rising over the past week. This represented an intense battle between bulls and bears at the $300-area. It is unclear who the winner will be, but Bitcoin’s next move will have a big influence on the outcome.

Bullish short-term structure was weakened by volume divergence

Source: TAO/USDT on TradingView

On the 4-hour chart, the structure seemed bullish. The move beyond $300.7 (white) represented a bullish structure break after the retracement to $242.7. At the time of writing, the price had found support at the moving averages, and the RSI was also above the neutral 50-level.

And yet, the OBV made a lower high over the past few days, even as the price pushed higher. This bearish divergence indicated a lack of buying pressure as TAO attempted to breach the $300-resistance.

Traders need to wait and watch Bitcoin’s moves over the weekend to understand where Bittensor token’s prices can go next. Neither buyers nor sellers have a clear advantage right now.


Final Summary

  • Bittensor challenged the $300-psychological level yet again after a brief retracement to $242.
  • Traders should not rush to enter positions, and patience for a day or two can yield more clarity.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit11m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit11m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit27m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy MOVE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Movement (MOVE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Movement (MOVE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Movement (MOVE)After purchasing your Movement (MOVE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Movement (MOVE)Easily trade Movement (MOVE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.10Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy MOVE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MOVE (MOVE) are presented below.

活动图片