# Developers Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Developers", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

Should developers build on enterprise-backed public chains like Base, Robinhood, or Stripe's Tempo? While these chains offer enticing benefits—primarily access to the platform's existing user base for accelerated growth—they come with significant, well-documented risks stemming from the inherent conflict of interest when a company controls both the underlying chain and major on-chain applications. The core promise is traffic distribution: projects gain exposure through platforms like the Coinbase wallet or app. However, this model creates five major risks: 1. **Direct Competition**: The platform can leverage its data and position to launch and prioritize its own competing products, similar to Amazon creating private-label goods or Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer. 2. **Wallet Agnosticism**: Companion wallets (e.g., Coinbase Wallet) must support multiple chains and integrate top applications across the ecosystem to remain competitive, diluting the promised exclusive traffic advantage for the enterprise chain. 3. **Competitor Exclusion**: Rival platforms (e.g., Coinbase vs. Robinhood) have no incentive to promote applications built on a competitor's chain. 4. **Profit Extraction**: The party controlling end-users holds disproportionate bargaining power and can capture most of the value, squeezing protocol profits down to marginal cost. 5. **Unfulfilled Promises**: Promised traffic support can be deprioritized or withdrawn based on shifting corporate strategies. In contrast, neutral chains like Ethereum or Solana avoid these platform risks entirely. For developers considering enterprise chains, risk mitigation strategies include: evaluating substantial onboarding grants, seeking (though often weak) contractual guarantees, and, most crucially, pursuing a multi-chain strategy while building independent user acquisition channels. Enterprise chains may be useful for initial cold-start growth, but the ultimate goal should be cultivating a dedicated user base rather than long-term dependence on a single, conflicted platform.

marsbit07/21 02:00

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

marsbit07/21 02:00

Should Developers Build on Corporate Chains Like Base and Robinhood? Five Key Risks to Consider

Should developers build on enterprise chains like Base and Robinhood? While offering enticing initial benefits like user access, these chains pose significant risks due to the inherent conflict of interest when the operator controls both the platform and a leading on-chain application. The primary lure is the promise of traffic and user distribution (e.g., through a parent company's app). However, five key risks emerge: 1. **Direct Competition**: The platform can use its exclusive data and positioning to launch competing products against third-party developers, mirroring cases like Amazon and Microsoft. 2. **Wallet Multi-Chain Reality**: Associated wallets (like Coinbase Wallet) must support multiple chains to remain competitive, diluting the promised exclusive traffic advantage for the enterprise chain. 3. **Exclusion by Platform Rivals**: Competing platforms (e.g., Coinbase vs. Robinhood) have no incentive to promote applications built on each other's chains, limiting growth avenues. 4. **Profit Squeeze**: The party controlling the end-user interface holds superior bargaining power and can capture a disproportionate share of value, squeezing developer profits. 5. **Unfulfilled Promises**: Promised traffic support can fail to materialize due to shifting platform priorities or strategic changes. In contrast, neutral blockchains like Ethereum and Solana avoid these platform risks. To mitigate risks on enterprise chains, developers should consider strategies like securing substantial onboarding grants, obtaining formal commitments (though these have weak historical enforceability), or, most effectively, pursuing a multi-chain deployment strategy while building independent user acquisition channels. Enterprise chains may be useful for initial cold-start user acquisition, but the core goal should be cultivating an independent user base rather than long-term dependence.

Foresight News07/20 11:24

Should Developers Build on Corporate Chains Like Base and Robinhood? Five Key Risks to Consider

Foresight News07/20 11:24

Infighting Erupted on Launch Day: Robinhood Chain's Launch Platform vlad.fun Sabotaged by Its Own People

On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launchpad vlad.fun experienced internal sabotage on its launch day. Two external developers secretly hardcoded their own token into the platform's frontend, making it the only token visible to users and hiding all others. The core team detected the anomaly within two hours, fired the developers, and removed the malicious code. The developers claimed the action was for "clicks." They refunded approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token profits, totaling about 7.8 ETH, to the team. An additional 4.16 ETH in protocol fees from the launch is held in a team multisig wallet. Built by a five-person team in 48 hours, vlad.fun's code was provided by the two external developers. Their last commit added the hardcoded line. When confronted, they initially blamed technical issues, but later attempted to delete the evidence before confessing. The platform is currently paused. A community member, Will Mexi, clarified he was not involved and was the one who discovered and reported the issue, having previously enabled branch protection which preserved the evidence. vlad.fun's design allows token deployment and direct listing on Uniswap V3/V4 in one transaction, with liquidity permanently locked to reduce rug pull risks. It features anti-whale measures and flexible fee routing. Despite this incident, the Robinhood Chain launchpad ecosystem remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction.

Foresight News07/20 08:00

Infighting Erupted on Launch Day: Robinhood Chain's Launch Platform vlad.fun Sabotaged by Its Own People

Foresight News07/20 08:00

Sharplink CEO: One Million Ethereum Developers, Who Can Compete?

Etherean Ecosystem: One Million Developers and a Formidable Moat The Ethereum network has surpassed a significant milestone: over one million unique lifetime developers, with approximately 232,000 active in the past year. This vast and growing talent pool is Ethereum's core advantage, far more critical than transient metrics like speed or transaction fees. The central question is not which blockchain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's answer lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and collaborative culture that is exceptionally difficult to replicate. It has become the default operating system for programmable finance. This massive developer base is actively working on complex, high-risk challenges that deepen Ethereum's strategic moat: * **Glamsterdam Upgrade (2026):** Focused on core protocol scalability (ePBS, parallel execution) while preserving core values like credible neutrality. * **Synchronous Composability:** Aims to make numerous Rollups interoperate like a single chain, directly addressing fragmentation concerns. * **Quantum Resistance:** Ethereum leads mainstream ecosystems in coordinated preparation for post-quantum cryptography, with a targeted migration plan around 2029. This developer advantage is self-reinforcing, fueled by: * **Deep Composability:** Applications interact like interoperable financial Lego bricks via shared standards (e.g., EVM, Solidity). * **Credible Neutrality:** Secured by over 900,000 validators, making it trusted by major institutions. * **Modularity:** Rollups (Base, Arbitrium, etc.) expand, rather than fracture, the ecosystem into a tightly connected modular internet economy. * **Culture:** Attracts top-tier researchers and standard-setters who guide the entire industry. In essence, while other chains generate activity, Ethereum is consolidating as the trusted, long-term coordination layer for internet-native finance. Its future is being built now by the architects of the next-generation financial infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报06/16 08:21

Sharplink CEO: One Million Ethereum Developers, Who Can Compete?

Odaily星球日报06/16 08:21

Ethereum Reaches the Milestone of One Million Developers, Sharplink CEO Delves Deep into Ethereum's Future Possibilities

Ethereum Surpasses One Million Developers Milestone: A Look at Its Unshakeable Dominance and Future Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink, reflects on his recent Asia trip where he engaged deeply with Ethereum developers and ecosystem leaders. The most striking takeaway was not just the industry's vibrancy, but the rigorous, long-term vision of local builders. This context brings to life a pivotal statistic: Ethereum has now surpassed one million cumulative developers (1,012,824), with approximately 232,000 remaining active in the past year—a talent pool unmatched by any other crypto ecosystem. The critical question isn't which blockchain is fastest, but where top developers choose to build long-term. Ethereum's answer is unequivocal. Its decade-long lead stems from a unique convergence of technology, institutional culture, economic systems, and composability, cementing its role as the foundational operating system for programmable finance. This massive developer base is tackling the industry's hardest problems, continuously strengthening Ethereum's moat. Key initiatives include: * **The Glamsterdam Upgrade (planned 2026):** Introducing ePBS and Block-level Access Lists for parallel execution and higher throughput while preserving core values like credible neutrality and fair MEV distribution. * **Synchronous Composability:** Projects are working to enable atomic transactions across dozens of Rollups, making them function as one unified chain and eliminating ecosystem fragmentation. * **Post-Quantum Security:** Ethereum is far ahead in preparing for quantum computing threats, with a dedicated foundation working group and testnets targeting a full migration by ~2029—a crucial factor for institutional adoption. Beyond developers, Ethereum's core network effects are its unparalleled composability and unified standards (like EVM and Solidity), which create a powerful flywheel: more developers → better tools → greater liquidity → more institutional participation. Its other decisive advantages include credible neutrality (over 900k validators), a secure modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a deeply entrenched culture shaped by top-tier researchers. Ultimately, there's a vast difference between generating short-term activity and becoming the trusted, long-term coordination layer for global native finance. Major institutions prioritize security, trust, and liquidity—areas where Ethereum holds dominant mindshare. The industry's trajectory shows resources consolidating around unified standards, deep liquidity, and developer consensus. After meeting the builders in Seoul and Hong Kong, Chalom is more convinced than ever: Ethereum's unshakeable future is being built right now.

Foresight News06/16 08:10

Ethereum Reaches the Milestone of One Million Developers, Sharplink CEO Delves Deep into Ethereum's Future Possibilities

Foresight News06/16 08:10

活动图片