Stronger US Dollar and Weakening Cryptocurrencies, Also Extends to Gold

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

The US dollar has gained strength, with the US Dollar Index rising 0.11% in a single day. This has coincided with a downturn in cryptocurrencies, with the total market cap falling 3.06% to $2.19 trillion and Bitcoin dropping below $64,000. The precious metal gold also declined, slipping over 1% in value. Major US stock indexes, including the Nasdaq and Dow, fell as well. Analysts attribute these market movements to factors such as geopolitical tensions, macroeconomic shifts, and investor uncertainty. However, these effects are believed to be short-term and may reverse as conditions stabilize.

The US Dollar has gotten stronger, but there are signs for simultaneous downtrend for cryptocurrencies. A similar trend moves a bit forward to also affect Gold, given that the precious metal has slipped by over 1%. Effects, in the long-term, are estimated to be reversed with uncertainty pulling back as one of the factors.

US Dollar on the Index

Reports that surfaced earlier underlined a growth of 0.02% for the US Dollar. It has now strengthened by 0.11% in a single day. The basket carries a benchmark of 97.810 when the article is being drafted, also reflecting a jump of 0.08% in the last 5 days.

America’s currency noted a previous close of 97.696 and an open of 97.698 with a day’s range of 97.695 and 97.957.

A stronger Dollar has attracted spotlight because it often signals a tighter liquidity for investors, especially those who are contemplating allocations to risky segments. However, such a phase is believed to persist for a short term.

Decline for Cryptocurrencies

A decline for cryptocurrencies coincides with the US Dollar getting stronger. The collective market cap is down by 3.06% to $2.19 trillion, with BTC exchanging hands way below the $64k mark. It is currently trading at $63,180.63, down by 4.78% over the last 24 hours.

A report by Business Standard has highlighted volatility across the crypto market due to geopolitical tensions and a shift in macroeconomics conditions. Additionally, it has pointed out that BTC briefly traded at $62,700 and ETH at $1,850.

Investors are now reportedly reassessing their positions as it is not just the US Dollar in the picture but also the evolving situation between the US and Iran, which could potentially cause severe oil disruptions. Thereby affecting investment sentiments once again.

Gold and Wall Street Too?

Yes, Gold and Wall Street were also seen affected by the US Dollar Index. Gold dipped by around 1.1% to $5,172.11 per ounce. It has now dropped further to $5,169.99 per ounce to mark a decline of 1.09% in a single day.

All three major US stock indexes fell as well. Nasdaq and Dow declined by 1.13% and 1.66%, respectively. S&P 500 plunged by 1.04%. Another factor that has possibly caused these disruptions is uncertainty since the announcement of a 15% tariff rate by US President Donald Trump.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Pi Network Marks One Year of Open Network Growth

TagsCryptocurrencyGoldUS Dollar Index

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trend of the US Dollar and how much has it strengthened in a single day?

AThe US Dollar is getting stronger, having strengthened by 0.11% in a single day.

QWhat is the primary reason cited for the decline in the cryptocurrency market?

AThe decline is attributed to the stronger US Dollar, geopolitical tensions, and a shift in macroeconomic conditions.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin (BTC) and by what percentage did it decline in 24 hours?

ABitcoin was trading at $63,180.63, down by 4.78% over the last 24 hours.

QBesides cryptocurrencies, which other major asset class was negatively affected by the stronger US Dollar?

AGold was also negatively affected, dipping by around 1.1% to $5,172.11 per ounce.

QWhat are the two main factors mentioned as contributing to the overall market uncertainty and affecting investment sentiments?

AThe two main factors are the stronger US Dollar and the evolving geopolitical situation between the US and Iran, which could cause severe oil disruptions.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit5m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit5m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit15m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit15m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片