Stablecoin payments below $200 can go tax-free: If Congress agrees

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-21Last updated on 2025-12-21

Abstract

In a renewed bipartisan effort, U.S. lawmakers Max Miller and Steven Horsford have proposed a tax exemption for stablecoin transactions valued at $200 or below, aiming to provide clarity and consumer protection. This follows a previous failed attempt by Senator Cynthia Lummis in 2025 to introduce a similar exemption. Currently, the IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, subjecting it to capital gains tax. Meanwhile, banking lobbyists oppose the high yields offered by crypto exchanges on stablecoin deposits, arguing it threatens traditional banks. Industry leaders, including Gemini's co-founder, are defending the GENIUS Act against what they call anti-competitive overreach by banks. The outcome of both the tax proposal and the stablecoin yield debate remains uncertain.

The U.S. Congress is making another attempt at tax relief for low stablecoin transfers and crypto staking.

In a recent House proposal, lawmakers Max Miller (Ohio) and Steven Horsford (Nevada) sought tax exemptions for stablecoins valued at $200 or below.

Part of the draft read,

“The provision is intended to establish a per-transaction de minimis threshold of $200, consistent with the foreign currency transaction exception under section 988.”

In a statement, Rep. Miller said that the legislation was a “bipartisan effort” to ensure consumer protection.

“This bill would protect consumers making everyday purchases, ensure the rules are clear for innovators and investors, and strengthen compliance so everyone plays by the same rules.”

However, this was not the first time Congress had tried to push for U.S. crypto tax clarity.

Senator Lummis’ failed crypto tax plan

In July 2025, pro-Bitcoin Senator Cynthia Lummis floated a similar tax proposal that included a $300 exemption for small transactions.

She also advocated for tax deferral for staking and mining rewards during the amendment process of President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. The exemption was to have an annual cap of $5,000 on crypto gains to avoid abuse.

However, the provisions didn’t make it to the final version of the bill after failing to reach the voting threshold. Some Democrats also opposed the proposal, arguing that it would result in a loss of government revenue.

Currently, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37%.

For long-term investors, the tax rates are relatively favorable, ranging from 0% to 20%.

It remains to be seen whether the latest tax proposals will be included in the crypto market structure bill.

Stablecoin yield fight

Even so, the stablecoin yield paid out by crypto exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase, among others, continues to be opposed by the banking lobby.

According to them, it threatens community banks. They argued that deposit capital will shift to stablecoins in search of the 3%-4% rewards, rather than banks’ less than 1% yield on average checking accounts.

However, Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss and other industry players are also pushing back against the banksters’ anti-competitive ‘overreach.’

Reacting to a collective industry letter to Congress to defend the stablecoin law GENIUS Act, Winklevoss stated,

“We are not going to let them (banks) get away with this. That’s why we signed onto this letter with 125+ other companies to defend the GENIUS Act as it is written.”


Final Thoughts

  • Congress has revived the crypto tax exemptions for low stablecoin transfers.
  • However, the fight against stablecoin rewards issued by exchanges continues.

Related Questions

QWhat is the proposed de minimis threshold for tax exemptions on stablecoin transfers in the recent House proposal?

AThe proposed de minimis threshold is $200 or below for stablecoin transfers.

QWhich two lawmakers are behind the recent proposal for tax exemptions on small stablecoin transactions?

AThe lawmakers are Max Miller from Ohio and Steven Horsford from Nevada.

QWhat was the outcome of Senator Cynthia Lummis's similar crypto tax proposal in July 2025?

ASenator Lummis's proposal, which included a $300 exemption for small transactions and tax deferral for staking and mining rewards, failed to reach the voting threshold and was not included in the final version of the bill.

QWhy are banking lobbies opposing the stablecoin yields offered by exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase?

ABanking lobbies argue that stablecoin yields threaten community banks because deposit capital may shift to stablecoins seeking 3%-4% rewards, compared to banks' average checking account yields of less than 1%.

QHow does the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) currently treat cryptocurrency for tax purposes?

AThe IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37% for short-term gains and 0% to 20% for long-term gains.

Related Reads

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit4m ago

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit4m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit19m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit19m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit44m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit44m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片