S&P Call Options Explode to Record $2.6 Trillion Volume: The Crash Risks Behind a Frenzied Gamble

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

The article discusses a record-breaking $2.6 trillion in S&P 500 call options traded in a single day, which the author sees as a sign of extreme market speculation. The piece explains that retail traders are aggressively buying these options, betting on further price rises. To hedge their risk, market makers who sell these options are forced to buy massive amounts of the underlying stocks, creating a self-reinforcing cycle known as a "gamma squeeze" that pushes prices higher independently of fundamentals. The author warns that this dynamic is unsustainable, comparing it to a casino or past bubbles like GameStop and Tesla. The risk, they argue, is that when these options expire or positions are unwound, the buying pressure could reverse into violent selling pressure, potentially triggering a sharp market decline. While expressing long-term optimism for U.S. stocks, the article cautions heavily leveraged or speculative investors about the inherent dangers in the current market environment.

Author: SOL, The Unseen

Guys, I have something scary to tell you.

The trading volume for S&P 500 call options hit $2.6 trillion yesterday.

What does that mean?

There has never been a single-day number this high in the history of the US stock market.

01) Retail Investors Go Wild for Options, Forcing Market Makers to Buy Stocks

This $2.6 trillion isn't real cash buying stocks.

In reality, it's retail investors and traders frantically buying call options.

What's a call option?

A small bet that the stock price will rise. Win big if right, lose everything if wrong.

With US stocks hitting new highs every day, everyone thinks they'll keep going up, so they're buying like crazy.

But there's a problem: who sold you that option?

The market maker.

Market makers aren't fools. When they sell you an option, they take on the risk of the stock price rising.

To hedge, they have to buy the corresponding stocks.

For every $1 of options you buy, they might need to buy $100 worth of stocks to hedge.

So behind the $2.6 trillion in option buying, there's an astronomical amount of stock buying.

This isn't investors believing in the companies; it's the options market forcing market makers to buy stocks.

02) Gamma Squeeze

The mechanism behind this is called a gamma squeeze.

The higher the stock price rises, the greater the risk from the options the market maker holds.

They have to buy even more stocks to hedge.

The more they buy, the higher the price surges.

The higher the price surges, the more they have to buy.

Round and round it goes, rocketing the market to the sky.

That's the real reason the S&P has been hitting new highs daily.

It's not about how great company earnings are, or how strong the economy is.

It's the buying force from the options market dragging the index upwards.

But can this cycle keep spinning forever?

No.

Options have an expiration date.

On expiry day, the bulls need to close their positions, and market makers need to close theirs.

At that point, the force that was buying stocks turns into the force selling stocks.

And the force is exactly the same.

As fierce as the rise was, the fall will be equally brutal.

03) The Current Market is Not About Pricing, It's About Gambling

Right now, the S&P 500 isn't being priced by investors.

What is pricing?

Looking at how much money a company makes, its growth, the depth of its moat, and then assigning a reasonable price.

And now?

No one cares how much money a company makes.

Everyone is just betting on whether it will go up tomorrow.

Record call option trading volume means the market has turned into a casino.

Retail is gambling, institutions are gambling, hedge funds are gambling.

$2.6 trillion in option buying is a $2.6 trillion bet.

The bigger the bet, the crazier the market.

The crazier the market, the more people bet.

What's the difference from the A-share leveraged bull run in 2015?

None.

Both are pushed by money, not by value.

What money pushes up, it can also smash down.

04) When Will This Bomb Explode?

Nobody knows.

But every market driven by options has eventually crashed.

GameStop in 2021: a gamma squeeze sent the stock from $20 to $480, then back down to $40.

Tesla in 2020: an options frenzy pushed valuations to the sky, then it got halved and halved again.

History doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes.

The current S&P 500 is GameStop magnified 100 times.

The day those $2.6 trillion in options expire, or the day funds rush to close positions en masse, is the day the bomb detonates.

And when it blows, no one will give you advance notice.

-------

Guys, I'm not bearish on US stocks.

In fact, I'm long-term bullish. The US market has good companies, real growth, hard tech.

But the current market action has nothing to do with company fundamentals anymore.

I need to warn the brothers who are using leverage, taking out loans, buying on hype without cash flow...

On the way up, the explosive force sends you to the heavens.

On the way down, it blasts you into the ground.

If you're on board this ship, don't ask when it will explode.

Ask, when it explodes, will you still be on board?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the record-breaking daily trading volume for S&P 500 call options mentioned in the article, and why is it significant?

AThe article states that S&P 500 call option volume reached a record-breaking $2.6 trillion for a single day. This is significant because it is a historically unprecedented number, indicating extreme speculative activity in the options market rather than fundamental stock investing.

QAccording to the article, what is 'Gamma Squeeze' and how does it relate to the current market surge?

AA 'Gamma Squeeze' is a mechanism where, as the stock price rises, market makers who sold call options are forced to buy more underlying shares to hedge their risk. This buying pressure drives the price up further, forcing more hedging purchases. The article argues that this cycle, fueled by massive call option buying, is artificially pushing the S&P 500 to new highs, not fundamental economic strength.

QHow does the author characterize the current driving force behind the S&P 500's rise?

AThe author characterizes the current driving force as 'gambling' or a 'betting game,' not 'pricing.' They argue that investors are not pricing companies based on earnings, growth, or fundamentals, but are simply betting on whether the price will go up tomorrow, turning the market into a casino.

QWhat historical events does the article compare the current S&P 500 situation to, and why?

AThe article compares it to the 2015 Chinese A-share 'leveraged bull market' and the 2021 GameStop and 2020 Tesla squeezes. The comparison is made to highlight that price movements driven by speculative leverage or options mechanics (gamma squeezes) are unsustainable and have historically ended in sharp declines or crashes once the cycle reverses.

QWhat is the core warning the author gives to investors participating in the current market?

AThe core warning is for investors, especially those using leverage, loans, or who lack cash flow, to be aware of the extreme risk. The author states that while the 'explosive' force pushes prices up now, it will work with equal force in reverse when the cycle ends (e.g., at option expiration). The key question is not when the crash will happen, but whether you will still be exposed ('on the boat') when it does.

Related Reads

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ru43m ago

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ru43m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit53m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片