South Korea’s Stablecoin Bill Deadline Pushed To 2026 As Issuance Dispute Continues – Report

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-12-31Last updated on 2025-12-31

Abstract

South Korea's long-awaited crypto legislation, the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, has been delayed until 2026 due to unresolved disputes between the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Bank of Korea (BOK) over stablecoin issuance policies. The key disagreement centers on the role of banks in issuing won-pegged stablecoins, with the BOK advocating for a bank consortium to hold a majority stake in issuers, while the FSC warns this could stifle innovation. The bill is expected to include investor protections such as mandatory 100% reserve backing for stablecoins, strict liability for operators in cases of hacks, and enhanced disclosure requirements. Despite progress on other aspects, the finalization of the bill is now pushed to 2026 as regulators work to resolve their differences.

The submission of South Korea’s long-awaited crypto bill continues to face hurdles due to the ongoing disagreements between the main regulatory agencies over policies related to stablecoin issuers.

South Korea’s Digital Assets Act Delayed

On Tuesday, local news outlets reported that South Korea’s Second Phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act will be delayed until next year as financial authorities continue to clash over stablecoin issuance-related legislation.

According to Yonhap News Agency, financial circles and the National Assembly shared on December 30 that the main policies of the crypto framework have been largely decided.

Notably, the Financial Services Commission (FSC)’s draft is expected to include investor protection measures such as no-fault liability for crypto asset operators and isolation of bankruptcy risks for stablecoin issuers.

As part of investor protection measures, stablecoin issuers will likely be required to manage reserve assets in deposits and government bonds. In addition, they will be required to deposit or entrust at least 100% of the issuance amount with custodians such as banks.

The bill could also require crypto asset operators to comply with disclosure obligations as well as terms and conditions. Moreover, it may “impose strict liability for damages on digital asset operators in accordance with the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in cases of hacking or computer system failures.”

It will seemingly address allowing the sale of domestic crypto assets, subject to sufficient disclosure of information. Despite this, the key issues remain unresolved, suggesting that the final submission deadline will likely be pushed to the start of 2026.

Stablecoin Issuance Dispute Continues

As reported by Bitcoinist, the Financial Services Commission failed to submit the highly anticipated Digital Assets Act, which is expected to address the issuance and distribution of Korean won (KRW)-pegged stablecoins.

The financial regulator did not meet the December 10 deadline set by the South Korean ruling party to submit the government’s legislation to the National Policy Committee.

The bill was delayed after the FSC and the Bank of Korea (BOK) were unable to resolve their differences over the issuance of won-denominated stablecoins nearly three weeks ago.

The financial authorities have been debating this issue for months, with reports in November suggesting that the long-awaited legislation, which was expected to be approved at the end of this year, risked being delayed.

The FSC and the BOK disagree on the extent of banks’ role despite agreeing that financial institutions must be involved in the issuance of won-pegged tokens. The central bank has pushed for a consortium of banks owning at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer seeking approval in the country.

Meanwhile, the FSC has shared concerns that giving a majority stake to banks could reduce participation from tech firms and limit the market’s innovation.

Yonhap News Agency highlighted that the financial authorities also face other disagreements, including the initial capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, with opinions ranging from 500 million to 25 billion won, and whether to separate the stablecoin issuance and distribution functions of exchanges.

An FSC official reportedly asserted that they are “currently in the process of gradually narrowing the differences in positions with the relevant agencies,” while “discussing all possibilities with an open mind.”

The report also noted that the ruling party’s Digital Asset Task Force (TF) is allegedly preparing its own version of the bill, based on the legislative proposals submitted by lawmakers.

Notably, recent reports affirmed that the government’s proposal should be announced by early next month at the latest, as the integrated bill must be submitted in January 2026.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $88,158 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Related Questions

QWhy has the submission of South Korea's crypto bill been delayed until 2026?

AThe submission has been delayed due to ongoing disagreements between the main regulatory agencies, particularly the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), over policies related to stablecoin issuers, such as the extent of banks' role and capital requirements.

QWhat are the key investor protection measures proposed in the FSC's draft of the crypto bill?

AThe proposed measures include no-fault liability for crypto asset operators, isolation of bankruptcy risks for stablecoin issuers, requirements to manage reserve assets in deposits and government bonds, and mandatory deposit of at least 100% of the issuance amount with custodians like banks.

QWhat is the main point of disagreement between the FSC and the Bank of Korea regarding stablecoin issuance?

AThe main disagreement is over the extent of banks' role in stablecoin issuance. The BOK wants a consortium of banks to own at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer, while the FSC is concerned this could reduce participation from tech firms and limit market innovation.

QWhat other specific issues are the financial authorities debating besides the role of banks?

AThey are also debating the initial capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, with proposals ranging from 500 million to 25 billion won, and whether to separate the stablecoin issuance and distribution functions of exchanges.

QWhat is the new expected timeline for the submission of the integrated Digital Assets Act bill?

AThe final submission deadline for the integrated bill has been pushed to the start of 2026, with the government's proposal expected to be announced by early next month at the latest.

Related Reads

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

Munich-based humanoid robotics company Neura has completed a $1.4 billion (approximately RMB 94.9 billion) Series C funding round, valuing the company at around $7 billion and positioning it among the global leaders in the sector. The investment round is notable not just for its size—reportedly the largest in robotics this year—but also for its strategic backers, which include tech giants like NVIDIA and Amazon, alongside established industrial players such as German engineering firms Bosch and Schaeffler. This mix of investors signals a significant shift in the industry's focus from technological demonstrations and general-purpose narratives toward practical, industrial deployment and commercialization. Neura's approach centers on developing humanoid robots for defined, high-value industrial tasks rather than pursuing a general-purpose model. Its early validation comes from a partnership with BMW, where its robots are being tested on actual production lines. The involvement of Bosch and Schaeffler, companies deeply embedded in global manufacturing, underscores a growing belief that humanoid robots are transitioning from labs to viable factory-floor solutions. The article highlights two converging trends driving investment: advancements in AI and large language models, which enhance robots' perception and decision-making in unstructured environments, and mounting pressure from labor shortages and rising costs in major manufacturing regions. The funding landscape is now bifurcating between companies like Figure AI, focusing on versatile general-purpose robots, and firms like Neura, targeting specific vertical industrial applications with clearer, shorter paths to ROI. While technical hurdles remain, the core challenges for widespread adoption are increasingly seen as engineering and commercial in nature: managing the high integration and customization costs for different factory environments and establishing robust, localized maintenance and service networks. The record investment in Neura, particularly from industrial capital, indicates the industry's growing confidence in moving from proving feasibility to solving the practical problems of scalability, reliability, and building sustainable business models around humanoid robots in real-world settings like automotive manufacturing and hazardous labor environments.

marsbit5h ago

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片