South Korea’s crypto market is changing, but here’s why not everyone is happy!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) is set to lift a 2017 ban that prevented companies and institutional investors from trading cryptocurrencies. New guidelines, expected by February, will allow around 3,500 entities to invest in crypto for financial purposes. Corporations will be limited to investing up to 5% of their equity annually, restricted to the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market cap. While this aims to boost liquidity and stability, critics argue the strict cap may disadvantage Korean firms compared to more flexible markets like the U.S. and Japan. The status of dollar-pegged stablecoins remains under discussion.

For nine years, South Korea’s crypto market has been mostly driven by retail traders, with large companies kept on the sidelines.

That is now set to change.

According to reports from the Seoul Economic Daily, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) has finalized plans to lift the 2017 ban that stopped companies and professional investors from investing in crypto. A formal set of guidelines is expected by February.

This move is evidence that South Korea is changing its approach and wants to bring digital assets into the mainstream financial system.

South Korea’s crypto shift

If implemented, the decision will unlock large amounts of institutional capital that regulators have kept out of the crypto market for nearly a decade. In fact, authorities expect live trading to begin within the year.

As a result, South Korean companies could add crypto to their balance sheets just months after finalizing the new rules.

According to a senior industry official,

“The authorities will release the final guidelines in January or February and allow virtual currency trading by corporations for investment and financial purposes.”

Previous efforts prioritized user protection and restricted crypto activity to non-profits and exchanges. Once the new guidelines take effect in early Q1, regulators will grant legal crypto market access to around 3,500 entities.

This shift will reduce reliance on retail traders and attract professional capital, strengthening liquidity and stability on South Korean exchanges.

What about the guardrails?

Now, to avoid excessive market risk, the FSC has set clear limits on how companies can invest in crypto.

Corporations will be allowed to invest only up to 5% of their equity capital each year. Investments will also be limited to the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market value. This rule aims to keep institutional money focused on well-established, liquid assets instead of highly volatile, smaller tokens.

However, one key issue is still under discussion, and that is whether U.S dollar–pegged stablecoins like USDT will be allowed.

This decision will be important, as it affects how easily companies can manage risk and move funds between global and local markets.

Industry backlash

Despite the significance of the policy shift, parts of South Korea’s financial industry have already raised concerns.

Critics argue that the 5% investment cap is overly restrictive and could put Korean companies at a global disadvantage. On the contrary, major markets like the United States and Japan place no limits on corporate crypto holdings.

The European Union and Singapore also allow greater flexibility, giving companies more freedom to manage crypto on their balance sheets.

Expressing the prevailing sentiment of the local market, a financial industry insider noted,

“Investment limits, which do not exist overseas, could weaken the inflow of funds and prevent the emergence of specialized virtual currency investment companies.”

As South Korea dismantles its institutional barriers, the private sector is already moving to capture the first-mover advantage.

For instance, VivoPower International PLC recently turned its joint venture into a strategic link, creating a regulated fund focused on acquiring shares in Ripple Labs.


Final Thoughts

  • Allowing nearly 3,500 companies into crypto could significantly improve liquidity and reduce volatility on local exchanges.
  • Industry backlash has highlighted concerns that South Korea’s rules may lag behind more flexible global frameworks.

Related Questions

QWhat major change is the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea planning to implement regarding crypto investments?

AThe FSC is planning to lift the 2017 ban that prevented companies and professional investors from investing in cryptocurrencies, allowing institutional capital into the crypto market.

QWhat are the specific limits set by the FSC for corporate crypto investments in South Korea?

ACorporations will be allowed to invest only up to 5% of their equity capital each year, and investments will be limited to the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market value.

QWhy are some parts of South Korea's financial industry critical of the new crypto investment guidelines?

ACritics argue that the 5% investment cap is overly restrictive and could put Korean companies at a global disadvantage, as major markets like the U.S. and Japan have no such limits.

QHow many entities are expected to gain legal crypto market access once the new guidelines take effect?

ARegulators will grant legal crypto market access to around 3,500 entities once the new guidelines take effect in early Q1.

QWhat is one key issue still under discussion regarding the new crypto investment rules in South Korea?

AOne key issue under discussion is whether U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDT will be allowed, which affects how companies manage risk and move funds between global and local markets.

Related Reads

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手36m ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手36m ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit43m ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit43m ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片