South Korea’s Bithumb crypto exchange delays IPO until after 2028 – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

South Korea's Bithumb crypto exchange has postponed its initial public offering (IPO), originally planned for 2027, to after 2028. The delay is described as a strategic decision to maximize corporate value amid evolving regulations, particularly the upcoming Framework Act on Digital Assets expected by the second half of 2026. Bithumb has engaged Samjong KPMG as an IPO advisor and is strengthening internal controls and accounting policies. Shareholders have expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of dividends despite improved performance, contrasting Bithumb with competitor Dunamu. The company defended its capital allocation strategy, prioritizing market share expansion. Financially, Bithumb reported 2025 total assets of ₩3.3249 trillion and liabilities of ₩2.461 trillion. Despite recent operational issues, including a significant accidental Bitcoin transfer, the exchange recorded a trading volume of over $523 million, with on-chain data indicating increased selling pressure. The IPO delay appears aimed at ensuring more favorable market conditions and regulatory clarity.

Bithumb, a South Korean crypto exchange’s initial public offering (IPO), which was earlier planned for 2027, has now shifted to sometime after 2028.

According to a recent report published by Maeil Business News Korea, Bithumb CFO Jeong Sang-gyun said that the firm had signed an “IPO advisory contract with Samjong KPMG” and added,

We are currently in the process of preparing to strengthen accounting policies and internal controls, and as we are pursuing the industry’s first listing, we are conducting thorough internal verification.

Reason behind the delay

The firm believes this delay is not because of negligence but a “strategic move” to “maximise corporate value” with the ever-changing laws and regulations.

Here, Sang-gyun refers to the Framework Act on Digital Assets, which is all set to be approved by H2 2026.

Additionally, there are a few shareholders who are expecting the company to start paying dividends again. This is in correlation to the” improvements in performance”, but in turn, no dividends to the shareholders.

In fact, one shareholder even compared Bithumb to its competitor Dunamu, which pays dividends. In response to this, CEO Lee Jae-won argued,

Last year, considering the competitive market conditions, we concentrated capital on expanding the company’s market share and increasing corporate value.

Bithumb’s 2025 stats and current market dynamics

This coincided with the firm’s 12th fiscal year financial report approved on the last day of Q1 2026. According to the report, the crypto exchange has recorded total assets worth 3.3249 trillion and total liabilities nearing 2.461 trillion in 2025.

Still, in 2025, Bithumb didn’t see any talks around IPO heating up.

Yet, despite such bottlenecks, Bithumb trading volume stood at $523,156,667 at press time, after a 10.2% in the past 24 hours.

Additionally, as per CryptoQuant, the Bithumb’s outflow chart showed that more Bitcoin [BTC] was being deposited than withdrawn.

Source: CryptoQuant

Simply put, there’s a surge in selling pressure, but the sideways price movement of Bitcoin hints that bears and bulls are trying to balance things out.

This followed a recent incident wherein the exchange was caught up in an investigation. The investigation was for sending over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to customers, accidentally to users.

All this might have pushed Bithumb to rethink its timeline for IPO to make things work in its favour.


Final Summary

  • Bithumb’s delay looks like a strategic delay, not merely signs of negligence or procrastination.
  • Growing shareholder dissatisfaction reflects a huge gap between the company’s profit and investors’ reward.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy has Bithumb delayed its IPO until after 2028?

ABithumb has delayed its IPO as a strategic move to maximize corporate value in light of the upcoming Framework Act on Digital Assets, which is expected to be approved by H2 2026, and to ensure thorough internal verification as they pursue the industry's first listing.

QWhat is the Framework Act on Digital Assets and how does it relate to Bithumb's IPO delay?

AThe Framework Act on Digital Assets is a new regulatory law set to be approved in the second half of 2026. Bithumb is delaying its IPO to align with these ever-changing laws and regulations to maximize its corporate value.

QWhat are shareholders' concerns regarding Bithumb, as mentioned in the article?

ASome shareholders are dissatisfied because Bithumb has not been paying dividends despite improvements in performance. They have compared the company unfavorably to its competitor Dunamu, which does pay dividends.

QWhat was notable about Bithumb's Bitcoin outflow according to CryptoQuant data?

ACryptoQuant data showed that more Bitcoin was being deposited into Bithumb than withdrawn, indicating a surge in selling pressure. However, the sideways price movement of Bitcoin suggested a balance between bearish and bullish forces.

QWhat recent incident involving Bithumb was mentioned that might have influenced its decision to delay the IPO?

ABithumb was recently involved in an investigation for accidentally sending over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its users. This incident may have contributed to the decision to rethink the IPO timeline.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit23m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit23m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit32m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit32m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit33m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片