South Korea regulator misses stablecoin bill deadline: What’s next?

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) missed its December 10 deadline to submit a draft stablecoin bill due to ongoing disagreements between regulators and lawmakers. The central bank (BOK) insists that only bank-led consortia holding at least 51% of a stablecoin issuer should be permitted to issue such tokens. However, the ruling party’s Digital Asset Task Force opposes this, arguing it would hinder innovation and prefers a more flexible approach. A policy consultative body involving multiple agencies may be established to make unified decisions on stablecoin regulation. A consolidated bill is now expected by early January 2026.

South Korea’s top financial regulator missed a key deadline to deliver a draft stablecoin bill, as lawmakers and agencies continue to debate who should be allowed to issue the digital tokens.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) failed to submit a draft legislative proposal on stablecoin regulation by Dec. 10 as required by the country’s ruling Democratic Party of Korea.

“We were unable to submit a proposal within the requested timeframe,” the FSC said in a report by the local news agency Newsis, adding that the authority needed more time to coordinate its position with relevant agencies.

A subsequent report by Yonhap Infomax indicated that the Democratic Party’s Digital Asset Task Force (TF) opposes the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) position that stablecoin issuance should be restricted to a consortium of banks holding at least 51% in a stablecoin issuer seeking local regulatory approval.

BOK’s requirement would hinder innovation, ruling party says

“The Bank of Korea is advocating for a bank-centered consortium, but what the special committee values ​​most is innovation,” a lawmaker at the TF reportedly said, underscoring the role of laws that can foster innovation.

The Bank of Korea argued that if the bank consortium regulation is not explicitly implemented, it would be necessary to establish a policy consultative body, including the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, the FSC and the central bank. This authority would be expected to make unanimous decisions on issues such as stablecoin approval and regulation.

Source: Wu Blockchain

“We have a similar stance on the policy consultative body,” a TF member reportedly said, adding that there will be requirements on the timing of issuance approvals and that the central bank has committed to collaborating on these issues.

Related: US judge asks for clarification on Do Kwon’s foreign charges

“They seem to want the Bank of Korea’s voice to be reflected in the approval and regulation of stablecoins, so we need to coordinate,” the lawmaker added.

Draft stablecoin bill expected in early January

According to Newsis, the ruling party is expected to propose a consolidated bill in January 2026, which will likely push the government’s proposal to be released early next month at the latest.

In line with this schedule, South Korea’s ruling party reportedly plans to discuss the final direction of the legislation at an advisory meeting with external members of the task force on Dec. 22.

As lawmakers and regulators are expected to resolve burning issues, including the BOK-backed bank consortium requirement, the Democratic Party has shown a hardline stance, reportedly indicating it may pursue independent legislation.


Related Reads

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit25m ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit25m ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

After Alphabet's announcement of an $84.75 billion equity financing round, market focus for AI investment is shifting from pure growth narratives to capital efficiency and payback periods. The core argument is that AI is being re-priced from a software-like growth story into a heavy-asset infrastructure cycle, requiring massive capital expenditure (CapEx) on chips, data centers, and power grids. While Alphabet's financing itself is not a distress signal—part of it is for administrative purposes like tax obligations on stock compensation—it highlights the enormous capital demands of AI infrastructure. This demand extends beyond tech giants to pure-play AI model companies (like OpenAI, Anthropic), data center REITs, and utilities. Major tech firms are projected to spend heavily on AI data centers in 2026, signaling a broad-based capital cycle the market must absorb. Consequently, valuation logic is changing. Investors are moving away from questions about who has the strongest AI narrative and are now prioritizing clear visibility into orders, stable cash flows, and the cost of capital. This has led to recent pressure on high-multiple AI software and semiconductor stocks, while "picks-and-shovels" hardware, data center, and power assets with firmer near-term demand may see relative support. The key going forward will be monitoring whether rising CapEx guidance across companies is matched by a timely monetization of AI investments into revenue and cash flow. The market's tolerance for high spending depends on demonstrable returns. While the long-term AI thesis remains intact, the valuation framework has fundamentally shifted to emphasize capital discipline and payback speed.

marsbit32m ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片