Solana vs Ethereum – $4.4T traded, RWA holders flipped – But who wins?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-08Last updated on 2026-03-08

Abstract

Solana's trading activity has surged over three years, accumulating $4.4 trillion in total volume. Weekly trading, once below $10 billion, grew significantly in 2024, often reaching $20–40 billion and briefly spiking to $120–130 billion during memecoin-driven speculation. It has since stabilized around $12–15 billion, reflecting sustained retail demand due to its low-fee structure. In Real World Assets (RWA), Solana surpassed Ethereum in holder count (154,942 vs. 153,592), indicating broader retail accessibility. However, Ethereum leads in RWA value ($15.45B vs. $1.79B), maintaining its role as the institutional hub. Despite high trading volume, Solana's liquidity is thinner (0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio vs. Ethereum’s 4.57), making it efficient for small trades but challenging for large orders. It benefits from $15.4B in stablecoin supply and high throughput with minimal fees. Ethereum retains a structural advantage with deeper liquidity and institutional settlement capabilities.

Solana’s trading activity has expanded sharply over the past three years, accumulating roughly $4.4 trillion in total token trading volume.

Early periods showed modest weekly activity, often remaining below $10 billion. This phase reflected the network’s early adoption stage.

However, momentum accelerated through 2024 as weekly turnover climbed steadily. Activity frequently moved into the $20–$40 billion range.

That shift signaled rising participation across decentralized trading venues and memecoin ecosystems built on Solana.

Later, volatility intensified as several weeks recorded dramatic surges. At the peak, trading volume briefly reached about $120–$130 billion.

These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

Yet the surge proved temporary, and activity cooled afterward. Weekly volumes gradually compressed, indicating that speculative enthusiasm faded while core usage persisted.

As of press time, the network generated roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than early-cycle activity.

Thus, the trajectory reveals a hybrid structure.

Speculative spikes amplify short-term volume, while stabilized baselines suggest that Solana’s low-fee architecture continues attracting persistent retail trading demand.

Solana overtakes Ethereum in RWA holders

As Solana’s [SOL] trading activity expands, tokenized RWAs provide another lens into how its ecosystem is evolving beyond speculative markets.

Participation data begins to reveal shifting adoption dynamics across major networks.

Ethereum [ETH] still leads in capital concentration, securing roughly $15.45 billion in RWAs across 675 assets. This scale reflects strong institutional issuance and established financial integrations.

However, wallet distribution presents a different perspective.

Solana recorded roughly 154,942 RWA holders, slightly exceeding Ethereum’s 153,592 holders. This crossover suggested broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure.

At the same time, Solana’s total RWA value remained lower at around $1.79 billion, indicating an earlier stage of capital deployment.

Elsewhere, participation declines sharply.

BNB Chain [BNB] hosts roughly 39,218 holders, while Polygon records about 15,482 users.

Taken together, the structure suggests Ethereum remains the institutional hub, while Solana increasingly functions as a retail gateway for tokenized financial assets.

Volume surge test Solana’s liquidity resilience

Solana’s trading surge signals strong activity, yet underlying liquidity reveals a more complex structure.

DeFiLlama data showed $6.53 billion in TVL supporting $14.96 billion in weekly DEX volume. This produces a 0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio, far thinner than Ethereum’s 4.57 benchmark.

As a result, smaller trades execute with minimal slippage, reinforcing Solana’s appeal among retail traders.

However, larger orders still encounter shallow depth, where price impact rises quickly during demand spikes.

On top of that, roughly $15.4 billion in stablecoin supply supported more than 60% of trading pairs.

This stablecoin liquidity helped maintain continuous market activity across Solana-based exchanges.

Meanwhile, the network processed roughly 3.4K transactions per second while Average Transaction Fees stayed below $0.00025.

Yet Ethereum preserves a structural edge through $160 billion in stablecoins and expanding RWA liquidity, suggesting a layered market where Solana drives trading velocity while Ethereum anchors institutional settlement.


Final Summary

  • Solana continues attracting strong retail trading activity as weekly volumes stabilize near $15 billion, though liquidity depth remains thinner than Ethereum’s institutional capital base.
  • Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity.

Related Questions

QWhat was the peak weekly trading volume reached on Solana, and what was the primary driver behind such spikes?

AThe peak weekly trading volume on Solana briefly reached about $120–$130 billion. These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

QWhich blockchain currently has more holders of Real World Assets (RWA), and what does this suggest about its user base?

ASolana currently has more RWA holders with roughly 154,942, slightly exceeding Ethereum's 153,592. This suggests broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure, while Ethereum remains the institutional hub.

QHow does Solana's liquidity-to-volume ratio compare to Ethereum's, and what are the implications for traders?

ASolana has a liquidity-to-volume ratio of 0.4, which is far thinner than Ethereum’s benchmark of 4.57. This means smaller trades on Solana execute with minimal slippage, appealing to retail traders, but larger orders encounter shallow depth and greater price impact during demand spikes.

QWhat is the current approximate weekly trading volume on Solana, and how does it compare to its early activity?

AAs of press time, Solana generates roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than its early-cycle activity, which often remained below $10 billion weekly.

QWhat key advantage does Ethereum maintain over Solana according to the final summary of the article?

AAccording to the final summary, Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity, anchoring institutional settlement.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit27m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit27m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit34m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit34m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit43m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit43m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit46m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit46m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit48m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片