Solana Tries To Turn Fear Into FOMO — Can STRIDE Really Stop The Next $300M Rug?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

The Solana Foundation has launched a new security initiative called STRIDE (Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises) in collaboration with Asymmetric Research. This framework is designed to continuously assess and oversee the security of projects built on Solana through an eight-pillar system, with results made public. Alongside STRIDE, the Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN) was introduced—a coalition of security firms focused on threat intelligence and coordinated responses to hacks. These efforts follow a recent $286 million exploit on the Drift Protocol and represent a shift toward continuous, foundation-funded security monitoring rather than one-time audits. While these measures may help restore trust, new exploits on unaudited protocols could still face severe market reactions.

The Solana Foundation has unveiled new security initiatives framed as a “new wave” of ecosystem security.

Solana Attempts To Rebuild The Trust

This Monday, the Solana Foundation announced on a blog post the launching, in collaboration with Asymmetric Research, of the STRIDE (Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises) program. STRIDE is an organized framework designed to continuously assess and oversee the security of projects built on the ecosystem.

According to Assymetric Research’s own blog post, STRIDE works as an eight‐pillar security framework that will carry out independent reviews of ecosystem protocols to verify they comply with it. The results of these assessments will be released publicly, giving users and investors clear visibility into the safety of the platforms they use.

In parallel to STRIDE, the foundation also released the Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN), a member‐driven coalition of security companies and researchers focused exclusively on the Solana ecosystem. According to the blog post, founding participants of the membership-based network include Asymmetric Research, OtterSec, Neodyme, Squads, and ZeroShadow. SIRN is the “war room”, sharing threat intel and coordinating live hack responses across the ecosystem.

The new initiatives sit on top of existing tools like Hypernative, Range, Riverguard, Sec3, and AuditWare, which are offered free to builders to harden code from day one. This is a core shift away from one‐off audits toward continuous, foundation‐funded monitoring, public security reports and coordinated incident response.

A Shift In Security Protocols, But A Shift In Sentiment?

These moves directly follow the April 1st $286 million attack on the Solana-based Drift Protocol that ended up being attributed to North Korean hackers.

The blog post, however, makes no mention of the attack. Despite that, it does spell out the need to strengthen the security services the foundation offers.

Solana was built for security. And as the ecosystem scales, the stakes scale with it (...) Solana Foundation has a long history of dedicating resources to ensure that security services and tools are available to the ecosystem.

While it is true that security headlines and follow‐through on STRIDE/SIRN may help repair sentiment after the Drift shock, any new exploit on an unevaluated protocol could be punished harder.

At the moment of writing, SOL trades for exactly $80 on the daily chart. Source: SOLUSD on Tradingview.

Cover image from Perplexity. SOLUSD chart from Tradingview.

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the new security program launched by the Solana Foundation and Asymmetric Research?

AThe new security program is called STRIDE, which stands for Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises.

QWhat is the primary function of the Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN)?

ASIRN is a member-driven coalition of security companies and researchers that acts as a 'war room', sharing threat intelligence and coordinating live hack responses across the Solana ecosystem.

QWhich major security incident on the Solana ecosystem preceded the announcement of these new security initiatives?

AThe initiatives directly follow the April 1st $286 million attack on the Solana-based Drift Protocol, which was attributed to North Korean hackers.

QHow does the STRIDE program aim to improve security for users and investors?

ASTRIDE conducts independent reviews of ecosystem protocols and publicly releases the results of these assessments, giving users and investors clear visibility into the safety of the platforms they use.

QWhat core shift in security approach do these new initiatives represent?

AThey represent a core shift away from one-off audits toward continuous, foundation-funded monitoring, public security reports, and coordinated incident response.

Related Reads

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit41m ago

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit41m ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit42m ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit42m ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit52m ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片