Solana stuck in $122–$145 range as whales clash: What’s next for SOL?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

Solana (SOL) remained under pressure, trading below a critical short-term support level and confined within a $122–$145 range. Despite ecosystem developments like Coinbase's integration with Base for direct SOL transfers, market sentiment was cautious. Technical indicators showed weak momentum, with RSI near 40 and MACD signaling sustained bearish pressure. On-chain data revealed a clash between whales: one held a large, loss-making long position, while another held a profitable short. Liquidity clusters suggested key downside levels near $121–$122, where long positions were vulnerable, and upside targets near $128–$133. A break below $122 could lead to further declines toward $117, while reclaiming $125 might shift momentum toward $145 resistance.

Solana remained under pressure on the 24th of December as the price traded below a critical short-term support region.

Despite ecosystem developments, market structure reflected caution as liquidity-driven moves dominated intraday direction.

Repeated failures to reclaim higher levels weakened bullish conviction and reinforced short-term downside risk.

Observing price action, the price stayed largely confined within a broader $122–$145 range over recent sessions.

Sellers maintained control as upside momentum failed to attract sustained follow-through buying interest. This compression kept traders focused on nearby liquidation levels rather than continuing the trend.

Solana [SOL] RSI hovered near the neutral 40 level, reflecting weak momentum and limited directional conviction.

MACD remained below the signal line, highlighting sustained bearish pressure without a clear reversal signal.

Will whales decide Solana’s next major move?

On-chain data from Onchain Lens showed a sharp divergence between two high-profile whale addresses holding opposing leveraged SOL positions.

Whale “0x0e4” maintained a 20x SOL long position that faced losses exceeding $5.78M. An additional 20x BTC and 10x HYPE longs pushed total unrealized losses near $8.5M.

In contrast, whale “0x35d” held a profitable 20x SOL short position valued at approximately $11M. This position was gradually reduced, suggesting controlled profit-taking rather than aggressive risk-off behavior.

The same whale also held leveraged BTC and ETH positions, with combined profits exceeding $27.7M.

Infrastructure catalyst: Coinbase expands SOL

Coinbase announced support for SOL deposits and withdrawals directly through its Base network during the same period.

The integration enabled seamless transfers between Solana and Base without reliance on traditional third-party bridges. This development connected Solana’s high-speed ecosystem with Ethereum-based liquidity on Base.

Users gained the ability to utilize SOL as an ERC20 token within Base-native decentralized finance applications.

Market participants highlighted reduced transaction friction and improved cross-chain accessibility as key benefits. However, availability remained restricted across several jurisdictions, limiting immediate global impact.

Liquidity concentrated between $121 and $133

The 48-hour liquidation heatmap revealed dense downside liquidity clustered between the $121 and $122 levels.

This zone represented a high concentration of leveraged long positions vulnerable to forced liquidations. Price gravitated lower as this liquidity remained uncleared during recent sessions.

Upside liquidity appeared concentrated near $128.5–$129.5, with secondary levels around $131.5–$133. These zones represented stacked short positions that could act as upside magnets during momentum shifts.

Until then, price reactions remained muted, and corrective bounces lacked strength.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s behavior near $122 remained critical for determining continuation toward $117 or stabilization.
  • A sustained reclaim above $125 could have shifted momentum toward higher liquidity targets near resistance at $145.

Related Questions

QWhat price range was Solana (SOL) trading within according to the article?

ASolana was trading within a broader range of $122 to $145.

QWhat on-chain data showed a divergence between two whale addresses?

AOn-chain data from Onchain Lens showed a sharp divergence between whale '0x0e4', who held a large losing long position, and whale '0x35d', who held a profitable short position.

QWhat significant infrastructure development for SOL was announced by Coinbase?

ACoinbase announced support for SOL deposits and withdrawals directly through its Base network, enabling seamless transfers without third-party bridges.

QAccording to the liquidation heatmap, where was dense downside liquidity concentrated?

AThe 48-hour liquidation heatmap revealed dense downside liquidity clustered between the $121 and $122 levels.

QWhat two key price levels did the article suggest were critical for determining SOL's next move?

AThe article stated that behavior near $122 was critical for a move to $117 or stabilization, while a reclaim above $125 could shift momentum toward resistance at $145.

Related Reads

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

The 437-Day Return and Departure of Chen Hang at DingTalk This article chronicles the 437-day period from March 31, 2025, to June 11, 2026, when Chen Hang (also known as "No Move") returned as CEO of DingTalk, the enterprise communication platform he originally founded, only to later step down. Chen Hang, the creator of DingTalk in 2015, was brought back by Alibaba in 2025 after the company acquired his subsequent startup, HHO. His return was driven by Alibaba's renewed focus on AI and DingTalk's strategic role as its key to-B AI application. However, his aggressive management style, marked by strict work policies like mandatory clock-ins and extended hours, quickly caused internal friction and was criticized as being at odds with Alibaba's culture. Despite the internal turmoil, Chen Hang drove significant product launches. In August 2025, he unveiled "AI DingTalk 1.0," featuring new products like the AI-native entry point "DingTalk ONE." By March 2026, he announced "Wukong," touted as the world's first enterprise-grade AI-native work platform, representing a fundamental rebuild of DingTalk's architecture. The turning point came in early June 2026. A detailed internal post criticizing DingTalk's work culture went viral, followed by a public critique from a former executive. This prompted an unprecedented public rebuke from the Alibaba Partners Committee, which stated such management was not aligned with company values. One day later, on June 11, Alibaba announced Chen Hang's departure. He was succeeded by Chen Yusen, a 32-year-old technical expert known for founding cybersecurity firm Changting Technology. While Chen Hang's tenure laid the technical foundation for DingTalk's AI transformation with "Wukong," his leadership style ultimately led to his replacement as the company seeks a new direction under younger leadership.

marsbit9m ago

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

marsbit9m ago

The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the Inevitable 'Antidote' for AI?

Decentralized AI 2026 Landscape: Why Blockchain is AI's Essential "Antidote" Centralized AI faces structural bottlenecks—expensive compute, concentrated control, unverifiable outputs, and difficult data access—that cannot be solved by capital or code alone. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The decentralized AI stack comprises: * **Infrastructure:** The foundation with compute, verifiable inference, distributed training, data/storage, and privacy/verification layers. Projects like Akash, Render, and Filecoin provide cheaper, decentralized alternatives for raw resources. * **Middleware:** The coordination layer for agent discovery, identity, and commerce. Key players include Bittensor (a network of specialized AI subnets), Virtuals (an agent economy OS), and frameworks providing agent identity and tooling. * **Applications & Services:** Dominated by Agentic Finance (AI agents executing on-chain actions based on natural language) and Agentic Payments (machine-to-machine transactions using blockchain as a settlement layer). Projects like Giza, Infinit Labs, and x402 are enabling these use cases. Key trends for 2026-2027 show AI demand outgrowing infrastructure, compute becoming an asset class, and tokenomics emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Venice demonstrate decentralized AI is evolving from a narrative into a new model for coordinating intelligence.

Foresight News29m ago

The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the Inevitable 'Antidote' for AI?

Foresight News29m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片