Solana processes 40% of L1 throughput amid memecoin boom – Explained

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

Solana is currently processing approximately 40% of all Layer-1 blockchain transactions, second only to Internet Computer, as it handles a significant surge in memecoin activity. This period of intense speculation is acting as a real-world stress test, demonstrating the network's scalability, resilience, and consistent throughput of 2,000 to 5,000 transactions per second (TPS) without performance degradation. Key advantages like parallelized execution and low fees allow high activity to be additive rather than destabilizing. Furthermore, this usage translates into substantial economic value, with Solana generating $145 million in app revenue and over $110 billion in DEX volume in 30 days, far exceeding Ethereum and validating its sustainable monetization at scale.

Solana’s current memecoin-driven activity surge appears to be driven by speculative excess on the surface. Yet beneath it lies a real-time stress test of the network’s scalability, fee dynamics, and throughput resilience.

The network’s transaction throughput highlights production-grade scalability rather than episodic performance.

Since 2023, TPS has consistently ranged between roughly 2,000 and 5,000, with the latest reading near 3,200, even during memecoin launch waves.

Importantly, spikes tied to speculative surges did not trigger lasting degradation. Instead, throughput normalized quickly, signaling resilience under real demand.

Over time, TPS recovered from mid-2024 lows near 2,000 and scaled again into 2025, reflecting ecosystem growth rather than one-off stress events.

This consistency matters. Weekly averages show Solana [SOL] capturing approximately 40% of L1 transaction throughput, second only to the Internet Computer [ICP] at roughly 4,100 TPS.

In contrast, peers like TRON [TRX], BNB Chain, and Ethereum [ETH] operate orders of magnitude lower, typically below 150 TPS.

Solana’s edge stems from parallelized execution, low fees, and optimized networking.

As a result, high activity becomes additive, not destabilizing. Low degradation under stress, therefore, confirms production readiness, not laboratory benchmarks in live environments.

The memecoin comeback

Memecoin activity on Solana has been accelerating again, with Daily Token Deployments climbing above 40,000, marking an 11-month high.

Importantly, this resurgence aligned with sustained transaction throughput near 3,000–5,000 TPS, even during peak launch periods.

As a result, high-volume token creation does not degrade network performance.

Instead, consistent TPS enables rapid launches, frequent trading, and continuous experimentation.

Over recent months, Deployment Counts trended higher alongside stable execution, confirming scalability under real demand.

Moreover, launchpad diversity has expanded rather than concentrated, signaling broad participation. High TPS lowers friction, attracts speculative activity, and reinforces Solana’s role as the preferred execution layer for memecoin cycles.

Speculation converts into revenue, not just volume

Speculative activity on Solana has been converting into measurable economic value rather than transient volume.

Over the past 30 days, DEX Volume exceeded $110 billion in the last 30 days, more than double Ethereum’s $47 billion, signaling sustained trading intensity.

Echoing this, application revenue followed. Solana generated roughly $145 million in App Revenue over the same window, outpacing peers and validating fee capture.

Importantly, this revenue emerged during a memecoin-driven cycle, not a lull. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid [HYPE] and Base trailed meaningfully, despite strong niches.

As activity scales, base and priority fees compound with MEV extraction, reinforcing monetization. Therefore, throughput is not hollow. Usage pays, confirming sustainability at scale.


Final Thoughts

  • Memecoin-driven speculation on Solana doubles as a live stress test, proving the network sustains high throughput without degradation while scaling real usage.
  • Crucially, elevated activity converts into revenue, showing Solana’s throughput advantage translates into durable economic value, not hollow volume.

Related Questions

QWhat percentage of L1 transaction throughput does Solana capture according to the article?

AApproximately 40%.

QHow does Solana's transaction throughput during the memecoin boom compare to Ethereum's?

ASolana's throughput is orders of magnitude higher, typically operating between 2,000 and 5,000 TPS, while Ethereum operates below 150 TPS.

QWhat was the 30-day DEX volume on Solana compared to Ethereum?

ASolana's DEX volume exceeded $110 billion, which is more than double Ethereum's $47 billion.

QWhat key technical features give Solana its throughput edge according to the article?

AParallelized execution, low fees, and optimized networking.

QWhat did the resurgence in memecoin activity on Solana not cause, demonstrating the network's resilience?

AIt did not trigger lasting degradation in network performance; throughput normalized quickly and remained consistent.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit3h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit4h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit4h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手4h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片