Pundit Shares ‘Urgent Update’ With XRP Community – Here’s What He Said

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-12-29Last updated on 2025-12-29

Abstract

Crypto pundit Apex Crypto issued an urgent update to the XRP community, strongly refuting claims made by another analyst, Lewis Jackson. Jackson argued that XRP’s utility would not drive its price to high targets like $1,000, suggesting that banks using Ripple’s services would recycle XRP without affecting its price. Apex Crypto dismissed Jackson’s video as filled with inaccuracies and misunderstandings of how the XRP Ledger and Ripple’s solutions actually work. He described the content as dangerous misinformation that misleads newcomers. Apex emphasized that Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s understanding of the technology contradicts Jackson’s claims, which he called "fundamentally worthless." He reassured XRP holders that the token’s fundamentals remain strong and urged the community to ignore Jackson’s analysis. At the time of writing, XRP was trading around $1.91, up 2% in 24 hours.

Crypto pundit Apex Crypto has shared an urgent update with the XRP community as he looked to debunk a theory outlined by another pundit, Lewis Jackson. Jackson suggested that the altcoin is unlikely to reach ambitious targets, such as $1,000, regardless of its utility.

Pundit Shares Urgent Update With XRP Community

In an X post, Apex Crypto stated that Lewis Jackson’s video, which covered XRP flow, utility, and private/shared ledgers, was “packed with profound misunderstandings.” He further remarked that they are filled with “blatant inaccuracies” and “outright nonsense” about how the XRP Ledger and Ripple’s solutions actually function.

Related Reading: What Does XRP Really Do? Expert Explains What It Is Built For

Apex Crypto declared that Lewis Jackson’s statements aren’t a difference in opinion but a complete disconnect from technical reality and verifiable facts. He further described the level of misinformation as “genuinely upsetting” and noted that the content is “dangerous junk” that could mislead people, especially new community members.

Lewis Jackson released a YouTube video claiming that banks do not need to hold millions of XRP to access Ripple’s cross-border payment service and perform transactions. He noted that these institutions will end up recycling the altcoin in circulation for their transactions, and so there is no impact on the price or any potential supply shock. Based on this, Jackson declared that its utility doesn’t equate to a high price for the altcoin.

He also proposed a ‘Jackson Liquidity’ framework, which Apex Crypto described alongside the conclusions in the video as being “fundamentally worthless.” The pundit stated that the statements should be “shredded, discarded, and ignored.” Apex Crypto explained that for these claims to be even 15% correct, it would mean that Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz, who created the XRP Ledger, would have to be 100% wrong.

Apex Crypto asserted that Schwartz being wrong about how the Ledger, Interledger, AMM, and Ripple’s CBDC platform actually work is “obviously impossible” and not the case. He further remarked that Jackson’s statement was particularly frustrating because of how he positioned himself as the only one who had truly figured out how the altcoin works.

At the same time, the pundit claimed that Jackson was pushing deeply flawed misinformation and attempting to funnel the entire community toward this erroneous framework.

No Need For XRP Holders To Be Afraid

Apex Crypto assured XRP holders that there was no need to be afraid, stating that they did not need to wait for his response videos to feel confident again. He remarked that his post alone should be more than enough to reassure them that Jackson’s statements are “pure junk.” The pundit added that the fundamentals and potential of the token remain solid and that none of the noise changes a thing.

Related Reading: Why This Pundit Believes That XRP Holders Will Become Millionaires And Billionaires

Meanwhile, Apex Crypto stated that his post wasn’t a personal attack on Lewis Jackson, as he has respect for the effort that he has put in over the years. However, the pundit declared that the recent statements from Jackson are a genuine concern for the XRP community and deep frustration with the inaccuracies and the way Jackson has presented the misinformation as factual analysis.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.91, up 2% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.90 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat was the main purpose of Apex Crypto's urgent update to the XRP community?

ATo debunk Lewis Jackson's theory that XRP is unlikely to reach high price targets like $1,000 and to correct what he described as 'profound misunderstandings' and 'blatant inaccuracies' about how the XRP Ledger and Ripple's solutions function.

QAccording to Lewis Jackson's video, why did he claim that XRP's utility would not lead to a high price?

AHe claimed that banks do not need to hold large amounts of XRP to use Ripple's services, as they would simply use the XRP already in circulation for transactions, thereby having no impact on the token's price or causing a supply shock.

QHow did Apex Crypto characterize the statements made by Lewis Jackson?

AHe characterized them as not just a difference of opinion but a 'complete disconnect from technical reality and verifiable facts,' calling the content 'dangerous junk' filled with misinformation that could mislead people.

QWhat did Apex Crypto say about the need for XRP holders to be afraid of Jackson's claims?

AHe assured holders there was no need to be afraid, stating that his post alone should be enough to reassure them that Jackson's statements are 'pure junk' and that the fundamentals and potential of XRP remain solid.

QWhat was the price of XRP at the time of writing, according to the article?

AXRP was trading at around $1.91, up 2% in the last 24 hours.

Related Reads

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn36m ago

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn36m ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit1h ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit1h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit1h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片