Prosecutors Oppose Sam Bankman-Fried’s Request for New Trial

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-12Last updated on 2026-03-12

Abstract

Prosecutors have opposed Sam Bankman-Fried's request for a new trial, arguing that he failed to present legitimate new evidence. Bankman-Fried’s motion, filed in February, claimed that testimony from two former FTX officials could have challenged the prosecution's fraud narrative, but prosecutors stated these witnesses were known prior to the trial and their testimony does not qualify as new evidence. They also argued that the testimony would not have altered the trial outcome, citing overwhelming evidence that Bankman-Fried misappropriated billions in customer funds. Additionally, prosecutors dismissed Bankman-Fried's claim that FTX was not bankrupt, noting a severe shortfall in cryptocurrency holdings compared to customer claims.

The prosecutors of the United States requested a judge to decline a request by former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried for a new trial, claiming that the jailed crypto official has not been successful in showing any legitimate new evidence.

The proposal of Bankman-Fried, filed in February by his mother on his behalf, cited new evidence to reopen a case in which a 2023 jury convicted him of fraud and conspiracy associated with the decline of FTX. He is convicted with a 25-year prison sentence.

In the February motion, Bankman-Fried claimed that two ex-FTX officials, Daniel Chapsky and Ryan Salame, could have questioned the narrative of the prosecutor that he cheated FTX customers had they borne witness.

The ex-CEOs argued that both rejected testifying because of the fear of retaliation. As per the Wednesday filing, prosecutors declined that argument, mentioning that the witnesses were completely known to the defence before trial; conveying testimony does not qualify as recently discovered evidence.

The Rejection of the Argument

The decision of the defence not to put the witnesses on his witness list or force their testimony precludes any argument that their post-trial views are recently discovered, the prosecutors stated.

The prosecutors also claimed that even if the testimony were looked at, it would not have changed the result of the case, as there was overwhelming evidence showing that Bankman-Fried shifted the transfer of billions of dollars in customer funds to Alameda.

The motion of Bankman-Fried also continued his prolonged argument that FTX was not bankrupt and that customers could eventually be repaid. The prosecutors rejected that argument, mentioning that FTX has a shortage of the cryptocurrency it promised customers, at one point holding around 105 bitcoin against customer claims nearing 100,000 bitcoin.

They also added that the ultimate recovery of assets via bankruptcy proceedings does not justify the underlying crime.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Mastercard has Launched Crypto Partner Program, Connecting Industry Leaders

TagsbankruptcyFTXSam Bankman Fried

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason prosecutors gave for opposing Sam Bankman-Fried's request for a new trial?

AProsecutors argued that Bankman-Fried failed to present any legitimate new evidence that would warrant a new trial.

QWho filed the February motion for a new trial on behalf of Sam Bankman-Fried?

AThe motion was filed by his mother on his behalf.

QWhich two former FTX officials did Bankman-Fried claim could have challenged the prosecution's narrative if they had testified?

ADaniel Chapsky and Ryan Salame.

QAccording to prosecutors, why would the testimony of these witnesses not have changed the case outcome?

ABecause there was overwhelming evidence showing Bankman-Fried transferred billions of dollars in customer funds to Alameda.

QWhat key evidence did prosecutors cite to refute Bankman-Fried's claim that FTX wasn't bankrupt?

AThey noted FTX held only about 105 bitcoin against customer claims of nearly 100,000 bitcoin.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片