Polygon’s payments push sparks POL backlash – ‘Holders have no equity’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-17Last updated on 2026-07-17

Abstract

Polygon's community is questioning how the network's shift toward becoming a profitable payments company will benefit POL token holders. One holder, Just Hopmans, highlighted that POL is down 98% from its all-time high and stated holders have no equity in Polygon Labs or claim on its future profits. He demanded clarity on how the company's success translates to value for POL and the Polygon network. Despite a 78% surge in POL holders recently, concerns persist over transparency, including the handling of the community treasury and large, unexplained token movements by the Polygon Foundation. While Polygon has seen record stablecoin transfer volumes, reaching $106B in 2025, its market share in the stablecoin settlement sector has halved since 2023 due to intense competition from Solana and Base. The project has not yet responded to calls for accountability regarding these issues.

The community of Polygon holders is now pressing for clarity on whether the recent Polygon Labs profitability push will trickle down to them. One of the token holders, Just Hopmans, said,

Polygon Labs is becoming a for-profit payments company, while POL is roughly 98% below its ATH. Holders have no equity in Polygon Labs and no claim on its future profits.

He further posed,

How will the success of this company create measurable value for POL and the Polygon network?

Source: X

How will POL holders benefit?

POL, the native governance token in the Polygon ecosystem, was rebranded from MATIC in late 2024. During its debut, it surged to $1 before a massive crash to $0.06, or about a 93% drop in 2026.

Despite the losses, POL holders have surged 78% to over 245K in the past month. For Hopmans, clarity on how these holders will benefit from future Polygon payment profits would be worthwhile.

He also sought details on how the community treasury, under the Polygon Foundation, will be handled after the transition. Hopmans claimed that Polygon Foundation, which oversees governance, moved over 50M POL in H1 2026 without clear communication to the community.

For Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron, the transition into a blockchain payment firm would ensure its profitability in 2027.

As of writing, the project has yet to respond to Hopmans’ call for transparency and accountability to the community. That said, Polygon’s move was not surprising given its resilience in the competitive payments segment.

Will Polygon increase its stablecoin market share?

The Ethereum L2 hit a record $106B in annual stablecoin transfer volume in 2025. So far in 2026, the volume is clocking $70B. This has been a growing trend since 2023, making it a key settlement layer for stablecoins, just like Ethereum, Tron, and Arbitrum.

Source: Visa

But in terms of market share, Polygon’s rising stablecoin volumes didn’t translate to increasing dominance.

In fact, since 2023, its market share of the stablecoin settlement market has dropped from 1.54% to 0.72% in 2026. In other words, it has lost about half of its market share in an increasingly competitive segment.

Over the same period, Solana [SOL] and Base have increased their market share from zero to 22% and 16%, respectively.

Source: Visa/Allium

It remains to be seen how the aggressive shifts to payments will bolster Polygon’s standings in the stablecoin settlement sector.


Final Summary

  • Community sought to know whether POL tokenholders will benefit from Polygon’s future profitability in payments
  • Polygon’s stablecoin volumes have increased from $62B to a record $106B, but market share dropped by half

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main concern raised by Polygon (POL) token holders according to the article?

AThe main concern is that Polygon Labs is becoming a for-profit payments company, but POL holders have no equity in the company and no claim on its future profits, raising questions about how the company's success will create measurable value for POL token holders.

QHow has the price of POL performed since its rebranding from MATIC, as per the article?

AAccording to the article, after rebranding from MATIC in late 2024, POL surged to $1 at its debut but then experienced a massive crash to $0.06 in 2026, representing a drop of approximately 93%.

QDespite the price drop, what positive trend is noted regarding POL holders?

ADespite the price losses, the number of POL holders has surged by 78% to over 245,000 in the past month.

QWhat trend does the article highlight regarding Polygon's stablecoin transfer volumes versus its market share?

AThe article highlights that while Polygon's annual stablecoin transfer volume has increased significantly (from $62B in 2023 to a record $106B in 2025), its market share in the stablecoin settlement market has actually dropped sharply from 1.54% in 2023 to 0.72% in 2026, meaning it lost about half its market share.

QWhich two blockchain platforms are mentioned as having gained significant stablecoin market share at Polygon's expense?

AThe article states that Solana (SOL) and Base have gained significant market share. Solana increased its share from zero to 22%, and Base increased its share from zero to 16% over the same period where Polygon's share declined.

Related Reads

Live-Action Short Series Forced onto the Big Screen by AI

Live-action short dramas, originally a popular online format, are now attempting to enter the cinema. Several top IPs like "What a Good Girl" and "One Family, Same Class" have received approval for film adaptations. This shift is driven by several pressures within the short drama industry. After rapid growth fueled by low costs and platform support, the sector now faces a slowdown with fewer hits and reduced investment. A major disruptor is the explosive rise of AI-generated short dramas, which dominate new releases and challenge the traditional model with their speed and low cost. Platform policy changes, such as adjustments to revenue guarantees, have further squeezed producers. In this context, film adaptation is seen as a potential new growth path. It offers a chance to extend a short-lived online hit into a longer-lasting IP asset, moving beyond the "fast production, fast consumption" cycle. Established short dramas bring pre-validated stories and emotional appeal to the table, potentially lowering the risk for film investors. However, significant challenges remain. Translating a fast-paced, fragmented viewing experience designed for phones into a compelling cinematic narrative is difficult. Past attempts by popular TV shows and variety programs to make films have often failed due to weak content. A short drama's massive online viewership does not guarantee box office success, as cinema requires a higher commitment of time and money from audiences. Ultimately, the success of these adaptations will depend not on their original popularity, but on their ability to tell complete, emotionally resonant stories that meet the standards of the theatrical market.

marsbit51m ago

Live-Action Short Series Forced onto the Big Screen by AI

marsbit51m ago

Asymmetry of Algorithmic Agency: When AI Makes Decisions for You, You Don't Even Have the Right to Oppose

As AI increasingly makes decisions on our behalf, a critical asymmetry emerges: the entities deploying these systems understand and refine their algorithms, while individuals merely endure the consequences. This article explores the three layers of this "algorithmic agency asymmetry." First, opacity shields system goals, incentives, and flaws, creating a "black box fallacy" where outputs seem objective. Second, algorithms amplify historical biases, repackaging past inequalities in a seemingly neutral, computational form. Third, recursive systems lead to "algorithmic drift," where users train the system and are simultaneously trained by it, shaping their own choices and behaviors. This asymmetry has profound implications, extending into hiring, education, policing, and daily life. Users adapt to what the system rewards, but only see the end result—a score, recommendation, or price—without understanding the underlying logic or manipulated conditions. To rebalance this power dynamic, the article proposes policy interventions: 1) Meaningful transparency and explainability for users affected by AI decisions. 2) Enforceable impact assessments before deploying high-risk systems. 3) Genuine human oversight with the power to challenge outputs. 4) Mandatory post-deployment monitoring and auditing. 5) Outright bans on manipulative or exploitative systems. Finally, fostering widespread "algorithmic literacy" is essential public infrastructure. Ultimately, this asymmetry is a structural power imbalance. Good policy cannot eliminate it but can narrow the gap by making automated influence visible, contestable, auditable, and governable.

marsbit54m ago

Asymmetry of Algorithmic Agency: When AI Makes Decisions for You, You Don't Even Have the Right to Oppose

marsbit54m ago

From StepFun to Galaxy Robots: The Capital Migration Path Behind WAIC Exhibiting Companies

From Stellar Steps to Galactic Generals: The Capital Migration Route Behind WAIC 2026 Exhibiting Enterprises The 2026 World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai showcased over 1100 exhibitors. Analyzing their financing activities over the past 18 months reveals key capital trends in China's AI industry, with the total raised exceeding 100 billion RMB. **Large Language Models: IPO Window Opens, Capital Concentrates on Leaders** This sector attracted the most capital. Companies like Zhipu and MiniMax have completed Hong Kong IPOs, setting exit benchmarks. StepFun (Stellar Steps), a star example, saw its valuation soar to an estimated $12B through rapid, escalating funding rounds—from millions in 2023 to a $2.5B Pre-IPO round in mid-2026 led by industrial players like ZTE. The trend shows a shift: IPO paths are clear, industrial capital is entering for strategic deployment, and large, concentrated funding rounds favor commercially viable leaders. **Embodied AI: Hyper-Compressed Financing Cycles** This field entered a capital explosion phase. Companies like Galbot (Galactic General) epitomize the trend, raising over 7B RMB across 5 rounds in under 2 years. Early VC backing quickly gave way to investments from industrial giants (Meituan, CATL, SAIC) and finally "national team" funds, signaling its status as a strategic industry. The compressed fundraising pace, as seen with other leaders, indicates high consensus on the sector's potential and intense competition. **AI Chips: Domestic Substitution Enters Deep Waters** Represented by companies like Moore Threads (which completed an 8B RMB IPO as the "first domestic GPU stock"), this sector differs. It faces longer R&D cycles, higher capital thresholds, and stronger policy reliance. Funding often involves state-backed capital and telecom operators, with lower VC participation compared to other AI sectors, reflecting the industry's inherent challenges. **Capital Flow Panorama: Five Key Trends** 1. **Winner-Takes-Most:** Funding is highly concentrated in top players within each sector. 2. **Embodied AI as a New Growth Pole:** It attracts rapid, large-scale funding from industrial chains, akin to the automotive sector. 3. **Industrial Capital Ascendancy:** Strategic investors like ZTE and SAIC are replacing pure financial VCs for technology synergy. 4. **"National Team" Prominence:** State-guided investment funds are actively co-investing, aligning AI with national strategy. 5. **Diversified Exit Paths:** Beyond IPOs, options like M&A and strategic investment are increasing. **Conclusion: Capital is Not Omnipotent** While massive capital influx signals strong market confidence in China's AI outlook, it brings risks: reduced ecosystem diversity due to concentration, potential compromise of corporate independence, and valuation bubble concerns amidst compressed financing. The investor's motive behind a company often reveals more than its technical specs.

marsbit1h ago

From StepFun to Galaxy Robots: The Capital Migration Path Behind WAIC Exhibiting Companies

marsbit1h ago

Before Second Attempt to List on HKEX, Performance of Semiconductor 'Little Giant' Suddenly Deteriorates

Shenzhen Vanguard Semiconductor, a state-level "little giant" specializing in power semiconductor devices, has once again filed for a listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange main board, with GF Securities as the sole sponsor. This is its second attempt this year. Backed by prominent investors like Intel Asia-Pacific, OPPO, Xiaomi, and CATL, the company's post-investment valuation soared over 500% to approximately RMB 2.9 billion in just two and a half years. However, a month before its application, China's securities regulator raised six inquiries, focusing on the fairness of share prices for recent new shareholders and potential conflicts of interest related to two employee incentive platforms, suggesting concerns over improper benefit transfers. Financially, the company's performance shifted in the first five months of 2026, recording a net loss of RMB 510,000 compared to a profit of RMB 26.53 million a year earlier. Its overall gross margin also dropped from 22.4% to 17.9%. This was attributed to a decline in revenue share from its high-margin WLCSP products, driven by conservative smartphone maker procurement plans amid market adjustments, leading to a situation of increased revenue but decreased profitability. Furthermore, Vanguard Semiconductor's distribution network underwent a significant overhaul, with the number of authorized distributors plummeting from 658 to 103 within three years, mostly terminated for failing performance metrics. Sales remain heavily reliant on distributors, accounting for 84.1% of revenue in early 2026. Concurrently, customer and supplier concentration risks are rising, with the top five customers contributing 67.9% of revenue. While industry observers note that high customer concentration is common, attention is drawn to whether shareholder relationships, such as with Huaqin Technology's affiliate holding a 2.12% stake, extend to the client level.

marsbit1h ago

Before Second Attempt to List on HKEX, Performance of Semiconductor 'Little Giant' Suddenly Deteriorates

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片