Mantle – Examining if MNT’s December strength can survive market fear

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Mantle (MNT) was among the few top 50 cryptocurrencies to post gains over the past week, rising 9.13% despite a 13% drop in daily trading volume amid broader market uncertainty. While the daily chart showed bullish signals—including a strong uptrend per the DMI and consistent capital inflows—the hourly chart indicated selling pressure. MNT faces a key resistance at $1.375; a breakout above this level could signal a buying opportunity, especially if Bitcoin recovers toward $94k. However, a drop below $1.21-$1.23 would invalidate the bullish short-term outlook. Traders are advised to wait for a clear breakout or breakdown before taking action.

Mantle was one of the handful of tokens in the top 50 crypto assets that had a positive performance over the past week. MNT was up 9.13% in a week and 1.37% in 24 hours.

At the same time, the daily trading volume fell by 13%. This was likely due to the uncertainty around Bitcoin as the leading crypto asset fell to the $85.7k area on Monday and struggled to recover.

Mantle [MNT] has outperformed Bitcoin (down 5.55% in a week), but is this a sustainable trend? AMBCrypto looked into the price charts to find out.

Solving the Mantle trader dilemma

The daily chart’s technical indicators were encouraging. The DMI showed a strong uptrend in progress, with both its ADX (yellow) and +DI (green) above 20.

The CMF had also been above +0.05 over the past week to show sizeable capital inflows, though this has slowed down a bit.

Structure-wise, MNT bulls had reason to be hopeful.

While the $1.375 swing high remained unbeaten, the internal structure has shifted bullishly. This could set up a breakout.

The 1-hour chart also showed a bullish structure. Mantle has slowed down after its rally from the 5th to the 13th of December, and found support at the $1.24 area. The DMI showed a strong trend was not in place.

The CMF’s -0.08 reading indicated elevated selling pressure in this lower timeframe.

Putting the clues together

This situation is not easy to resolve. There is market-wide fear and a wobbly Bitcoin [BTC], and MNT is trending in December.

The swing structure was not yet bullish, with $1.375 being a key resistance. Until it is breached, bears have reason to maintain their bias.

Traders’ call to action – MNT traders need to wait for THIS...

The daily timeframe showed steady capital inflows and a bullish shift in December for the altcoin. Bitcoin might climb toward $94k to hunt the liquidity built up there, which could boost short-term MNT sentiment.

Both the bullish and bearish arguments have weight. Based solely on MNT’s price action across timeframes, the bullish scenario is more likely.

A breakout past $1.375 and a subsequent retest as support would offer a buying opportunity.

Traders need to have clear invalidations before looking to go long. For example, a drop below $1.21-$1.23 would spell trouble for the bulls in the short term.


Final Thoughts

  • Mantle has been one of the few top 25 crypto assets to have performed bullishly over the past week.
  • It was approaching a key swing high resistance, and market-wide sentiment did not seem to favor the bulls now.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Examining the Open USD Partner Lineup: Follow Who's Joining to See Where the Money Flows

**Title: Deciphering the Open USD Partner Roster: Following the Money** The launch of Open USD is notable less for the stablecoin itself and more for its expansive list of over 140 founding partners, which reads like a "who's who" of global finance and tech. This coalition, including asset managers like BlackRock, card networks Visa and Mastercard, banks (BNY Mellon, Standard Chartered, etc.), tech giants (Google, IBM), merchants (Shopify), and crypto firms (Coinbase, Ripple, Aave, MetaMask), signals a strategic shift. The diverse membership reveals that stablecoins are increasingly viewed not as products to compete over, but as shared infrastructure too critical to be left to any single entity. Each partner category has distinct motives. Asset managers like BlackRock seek to manage the large, sticky cash reserves, a lucrative fee-generating opportunity. Merchants like Shopify aim for lower-cost settlement and potential yield on balances. Banks join defensively to retain custody and settlement roles, fearing deposit outflows to stablecoins. Tech companies bet on programmable money for future machine-to-machine commerce. Crypto firms gain mainstream legitimacy and distribution channels. Remarkably, the consortium includes direct competitors (Visa vs. Mastercard, Coinbase vs. Ripple), indicating that the fear of exclusion from this emerging financial layer outweighs competitive rivalries. However, this shared governance could also lead to slow decision-making. The roster's composition is the real message: it represents a collective bet that a widely accepted, consortium-owned stablecoin is preferable to proprietary versions or having none at all. For incumbents like Circle and Tether, this alliance poses a significant threat, as potential clients have collectively chosen to build their own alternative. The absence of major U.S. retail banks (busy with their own tokenized deposit networks) is equally telling. In essence, the partner list maps where the industry believes value and risk will flow in a tokenized dollar future, marking stablecoin's evolution from a product to a utility.

Foresight News14m ago

Examining the Open USD Partner Lineup: Follow Who's Joining to See Where the Money Flows

Foresight News14m ago

IOSG: Q-Day Countdown, Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrency?

IOSG: The Q-Day Countdown – Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrency? This analysis explores the looming threat quantum computing poses to blockchain technology. Quantum computers, leveraging Shor's algorithm, could theoretically break the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) underpinning cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. The article outlines a hypothetical "Q-Day" scenario where exposed public keys from dormant assets are compromised, leading to fund theft and a deep governance crisis. The core risk is not the complete erasure of blockchains but a systemic reset of public-key cryptography. Bitcoin faces significant challenges due to its "code-is-law" ethos and the immense social consensus required for migration. Its primary vulnerability lies in legacy UTXOs with publicly exposed keys. Ethereum's path involves a more complex, full-stack cryptographic agility upgrade across execution, consensus, and data layers. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" of 5-8 years to coordinate a migration to post-quantum cryptography (PQC), such as lattice-based or hash-based signatures. While the existential threat is often overstated, the real bottleneck is the immense coordination required across protocol developers, node operators, wallet providers, exchanges, and custodians. Market repricing of crypto assets may occur well before an actual Q-Day if quantum hardware roadmaps accelerate or regulatory pressure mounts. The article concludes that quantum computing is not a doomsday weapon but a severe stress test for blockchain's foundational security model and governance structures.

marsbit43m ago

IOSG: Q-Day Countdown, Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrency?

marsbit43m ago

Why 2026 could redefine Ethereum, Solana, Base and Avalanche

Blockchain infrastructure is undergoing a major coordinated transformation, driven by institutional demand for reliability, compliance, and predictable settlement. Over $30 billion in Real-World Assets (RWA) on-chain has exposed network weaknesses. Major blockchains are responding with foundational upgrades, moving beyond incremental speed improvements. Ethereum's "Glamsterdam" upgrade, planned for H1 2026, will significantly increase gas limits and introduce features like PBS (pre-blocked state) for enhanced settlement and parallel execution. Solana's "Alpenglow," targeting a mainnet launch in H2 2026, focuses on reducing finality time dramatically and freeing network resources to improve reliability. Beyond speed, compliance is critical. Base's "Beryl" upgrade in Q3 2026 will introduce a standardized, regulatory-compliant token framework (B20). Avalanche's "Octane" upgrade aims to boost transaction processing and reduce costs for enterprise applications. Even Bitcoin is evolving with the potential activation of OP_CAT by late 2026/early 2027. The competition is shifting. While technical upgrades are widespread, institutions will ultimately allocate capital based on proven execution, operational resilience, and regulatory compatibility during market stress. Ethereum currently leads in tokenized assets, while networks like Base and Solana are strengthening their institutional offerings. The blockchain that best delivers reliable, compliant, and uninterrupted service is poised to attract the greatest share of future institutional capital.

ambcrypto1h ago

Why 2026 could redefine Ethereum, Solana, Base and Avalanche

ambcrypto1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片