Kraken snaps up $60B token platform Magna – IPO next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-19Last updated on 2026-02-19

Abstract

Kraken's parent company, Payward, has acquired tokenization platform Magna for an undisclosed sum as it prepares for a potential IPO. Magna, which recorded a peak TVL of $60 billion in 2025, will operate as a standalone platform supported by Kraken's liquidity and resources. The deal enhances Kraken's capabilities in token issuance, vesting, staking, custody, and escrow services. This move aligns with Payward's confidential IPO filing with the SEC in November, following its reported $2.2 billion in adjusted revenue for 2025. Despite a challenging crypto market where Bitcoin has declined and newly listed firms trade below debut prices, Kraken aims to proceed with its public listing alongside other industry players like Ledger, Copper, Securitize, and Consensys.

Kraken’s parent company, Payward, has acquired tokenization platform Magna as it prepares for a potential IPO. The paperwork was confidentially filed with the SEC.

Kraken expands, IPO plans underway

The exchange has so far stated that Magna will operate as a standalone platform. They’ll be supported by the exchange’s liquidity, resources and know-how.

Payward and Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi made collective intent known with this deal. He noted that they’d want to “help projects move from idea to execution,” without “locking them into one stack.”

This deal will increase Kraken’s ability to handle token issuance, vesting, staking, custody and escrow services. These are tools increasingly in demand as more projects move on-chain.

Magna CEO Bruno Faviero said joining Kraken will give the platform more resources and global reach. Expressing happiness at the development, he stated,

“I couldn’t be more excited about our shared vision to support token ecosystems and the builders behind them across formation, launch, and growth.”

Magna currently serves more than 160 clients and recorded a peak TVL of $60 billion in 2025. The acquisition is in line with Payward filing for an IPO in November. They reported $2.2 billion in adjusted revenue for 2025.

They’re not the only ones...

Hardware wallet maker Ledger and digital asset custodian Copper have both explored US listings.

Tokenization firm Securitize recently reported revenue growth of more than 840% ahead of its own IPO plans. Consensys, the parent company of MetaMask, is also reportedly preparing for a debut.

Optimism was high at the start of 2025, as Bitcoin [BTC] surged to around $126,000 in October from under $94,000 at the end of 2024. Several crypto firms went public during that rally, many posting strong first-day gains.

But things went sour quickly.

Since October, BTC has fallen below $63,000, and newly listed crypto stocks have struggled. Bullish, eToro and Gemini are all trading well below their debut prices, with some down more than half.

Even Circle, which has held up better than its peers, remains below its opening level.

Final Summary

Kraken’s Magna acquisition will speed up IPO plans in a less than ideal crypto market.
The real test will be whether Kraken can go public as rivals struggle post-listing.

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit5m ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit5m ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手14m ago

The AI Bubble is Bursting

The article argues that while a bubble in the AI sector is real and is currently showing signs of deflation, this is a typical, even necessary, phase for a transformative technology. It draws parallels to the dot-com bubble, where speculative excess was followed by the consolidation of internet infrastructure, enabling the digital age. Similarly, today's massive investments in AI infrastructure (data centers, power, cooling) far outpace current application-layer revenue, creating a valuation imbalance. However, the author contends this apparent bubble is not a sign of failure but of a transition. Key drivers include the plummeting cost of AI inference (over 99.7% in two years), which, per Jevons Paradox, has unleashed massive new demand as AI moves from simple tasks to complex agentic workflows across all industries. The market is now cleansing itself of shallow, speculative ventures, shifting value from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative AI applications. The conclusion is that the underlying productive force of AI is undeniable. The current financial correction will eliminate weak players, leaving behind robust infrastructure and efficient models. This will ultimately fuel an "AI+" era where intelligence becomes as ubiquitous and essential as the internet, embedding itself into every sector of the economy.

marsbit15m ago

marsbit15m ago

The Next Bitcoin ETF Boom May Be Coming From Japan – Here’s Why

Despite recent outflows from US Spot Bitcoin ETFs, market attention is shifting to Japan as the potential next major market for such funds. This follows regulatory reforms in Japan that are moving cryptocurrency oversight to a financial instruments framework, potentially enabling Bitcoin ETF approval. Analysis suggests a Japanese spot Bitcoin ETF could attract significant inflows, ranging from ¥900 billion ($5.61 billion) in a conservative scenario to ¥3.1 trillion ($19.34 billion) in a bullish one. A base-case estimate of ¥1.4 trillion ($8.73 billion) would equate to demand for roughly 140,000 BTC. Beyond price impact, a Japanese ETF is seen as boosting Bitcoin's legitimacy and accessibility for investors and institutions. Bitcoin's price was around $61,038 at the time of writing, down 2.81% over 24 hours.

bitcoinist36m ago

The Next Bitcoin ETF Boom May Be Coming From Japan – Here’s Why

bitcoinist36m ago

Trump's 43 Minutes: The Strongman Narrative Unravels, the Media War Escalates

President Donald Trump's first public appearance in over a week, intended to project control amidst health concerns and political challenges, devolved into a 43-minute display of grievance and insecurity. He focused initially on a reflecting pool renovation, compared his rally size to Martin Luther King Jr.'s, and repeatedly attacked political opponents, judges, and U.S. cities. He signed executive orders, including one weakening job protections for senior federal employees, potentially replacing expertise with loyalty. His speech meandered to topics like communism before ending abruptly. The article highlights Trump's agitated, defensive state and the systemic pressures enabling his power. It details his personal attack on a CNN reporter, framing it as part of a broader assault on independent media to undermine public trust in unfavorable facts. This pressure is exemplified by the reported erosion of editorial independence at CBS. The author argues that as mainstream media faces political and commercial pressures, supporting independent journalists becomes crucial for preserving truthful information. The piece concludes by noting a symbolic House vote challenging Trump's Iran actions, suggesting growing Republican dissent, and frames financial support for independent media as a direct form of resistance.

marsbit4h ago

Trump's 43 Minutes: The Strongman Narrative Unravels, the Media War Escalates

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures