JPMorgan boosts Bitcoin, Ether ETF positions in Q2 filing

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

JPMorgan Chase significantly increased its holdings in Bitcoin and Ether ETFs during the second quarter, according to its latest 13F filing with the SEC. Its stake in BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) rose by approximately 25% to about 10.4 million shares, valued at roughly $356 million. Its position in the iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) surged more than fourfold to around 1.17 million shares. The filing also revealed new, small positions in XRP investment products from Grayscale and Bitwise, which an analyst linked to recent regulatory developments for XRP in the U.S. However, analysts caution that the 13F report aggregates holdings from various parts of the bank, including client-related activity, making it difficult to interpret these positions as a direct bullish signal on the assets. The filing also showed JPMorgan reduced its stakes in several Bitcoin mining companies.

JPMorgan’s reported position in BlackRock’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund increased by about 25% in the second quarter, while its Ether ETF position more than quadrupled, according to its latest securities filing.

The Form 13F filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, submitted Wednesday, covers holdings as of June 30 and includes 17 other investment managers across JPMorgan.

That makes it difficult to determine whether individual positions reflect a directional market view, Jonatan Randin, senior market analyst at PrimeXBT, told Cointelegraph.

“It gives you some idea of what they are doing but not their opinion about the future direction of a specific market,” Randin said.

JPMorgan reports larger Bitcoin, Ether ETF positions

The filing showed about 10.4 million shares in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) in Q2, up from 8.3 million shares in Q1 with a reported value of roughly $356 million.

Its position in the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) rose more sharply, climbing more than fourfold to about 1.17 million shares from roughly 267,000.

Randin said a 13F can combine holdings from different parts of an institution, including positions related to client activity and inventory, making it difficult to determine the purpose behind individual holdings. Form 13F filings also exclude short positions, meaning JPMorgan’s reported long holdings do not show its net exposure.

XRP appears in JPMorgan’s holdings

Beyond Bitcoin and Ether, Randin pointed to small positions reported in XRP investment products.

JPMorgan reported 181 shares of Grayscale’s XRP product worth $3,763 and 113 shares of Bitwise’s XRP ETF worth $1,356 in Q2, after reporting no positions in either product in Q1.

Randin linked the timing to regulatory developments around XRP and the emergence of spot XRP investment products in the US.

“From my point of view this adds credibility to the regulatory improvements surrounding XRP,” he said.

Related: Crypto whales accumulate as bear market nears late stage: CryptoQuant

Additionally, JPMorgan cut positions in several Bitcoin miners, which Randin said have become less straightforward proxies for Bitcoin as some expand into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing.

“If that was the reason for holding them, trimming that part of the portfolio makes a lot of sense regardless of your view of the future direction of price,” he said.

Magazine: Sorry everyone, Bitcoin is headed down to $43,500: Michael Terpin

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, how did JPMorgan's positions in BlackRock's IBIT and ETHA ETFs change in Q2?

AJPMorgan's reported position in BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) increased by about 25% to approximately 10.4 million shares. Its position in the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) rose more sharply, climbing more than fourfold to about 1.17 million shares.

QWhy does analyst Jonatan Randin say it's difficult to determine JPMorgan's directional market view from the 13F filing?

ARandin explains that a 13F filing can combine holdings from different parts of an institution, including positions related to client activity and inventory. It also excludes short positions, so the reported long holdings do not show the firm's net exposure. Therefore, it shows what they are doing but not their opinion on future market direction.

QWhat XRP-related investment products did JPMorgan report holding in Q2, and how did this change from Q1?

AIn Q2, JPMorgan reported 181 shares of Grayscale's XRP product worth $3,763 and 113 shares of Bitwise's XRP ETF worth $1,356. This was a change from Q1, where it reported no positions in either of these products.

QWhat reason does Jonatan Randin link to JPMorgan's new XRP holdings in Q2?

ARandin links the timing of these new XRP holdings to regulatory developments around XRP and the emergence of spot XRP investment products in the United States. He states that this adds credibility to the regulatory improvements surrounding XRP.

QWhat does the article say JPMorgan did with its positions in Bitcoin miners, and what potential reason is given?

AThe article states that JPMorgan cut positions in several Bitcoin miners. Randin suggests that this makes sense because some miners have expanded into other areas like artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, making them less straightforward proxies for Bitcoin, regardless of one's view on Bitcoin's future price direction.

Related Reads

Current State of Web3 Projects: 200 Projects Cease Updates Monthly, Only 70 New Ones Emerge

The article discusses a significant decline in active Web3 projects, based on data from RootData's "2026 Crypto Industry Dead Project Collection." It highlights that approximately 200 projects cease social media updates monthly, while only 70-100 new ones emerge, indicating a net loss in the active project count since mid-2025. RootData's methodology for identifying "dead" projects relies on three objective criteria: official announcements of shutdown, over six months of inactivity across key platforms (like X and Discord), or the inability to access official websites/social accounts. Over 70% of identified dead projects fall into the long-term inactivity category. Currently, RootData tracks over 20,000 crypto projects, with only about 2,200 considered active based on August social media updates. The analysis suggests the crypto industry is undergoing a deep consolidation phase. While infrastructure projects are declining among new entries (now under 10%), new projects are increasingly focused on application and distribution layers, with over 65% in categories like prediction markets, RWA cards, tokenized stocks, perpetual contracts, AI agents, and memecoins. The article concludes that this shakeout, driven by reduced VC funding, may force greater focus on sustainable business models and real user demand, potentially strengthening the ecosystem's long-term health.

marsbit38m ago

Current State of Web3 Projects: 200 Projects Cease Updates Monthly, Only 70 New Ones Emerge

marsbit38m ago

Unexpectedly Negative! US July Retail Sales Drop 0.6% Month-over-Month, Marking the Largest Decline in Over a Year

U.S. Retail Sales Unexpectedly Fall Sharply in July U.S. retail sales in July declined by 0.6% month-on-month, marking the largest drop since May 2025 and falling significantly short of the market expectation for a 0.1% gain. The cooling demand, driven by decreases in auto purchases and online sales, has prompted a more cautious outlook on consumer spending resilience for the second half of the year. The closely watched "control group" sales, which exclude autos, gasoline, building materials, and food services and directly feed into GDP calculations, fell 0.4%, missing expectations of a 0.3% increase. Core retail sales (excluding autos and gasoline) also fell 0.2%, against an anticipated 0.3% rise. Economists attribute the weakness to several factors: the fading boost from excess tax refunds earlier in the year, a decline in personal savings rates, and temporary disruptions. These include the shift of major promotional events like Amazon's Prime Day to June, hot weather around the July 4 holiday, and the post-World Cup spending lull. Specific categories like clothing, gasoline, and furniture saw declines. Notably, the consumption slowdown is accompanied by a shift in spending patterns across income groups. Recent data shows spending growth among low-income households has outpaced that of high-income households in recent weeks, even for discretionary goods, suggesting a potential convergence from the previous "K-shaped" economic recovery into a more uniform "C-shaped" pattern. Year-on-year, retail sales still grew 5.0%, indicating an overall robust level, but the sharp monthly miss is expected to increase pressure for downward revisions to Q3 GDP growth forecasts.

marsbit38m ago

Unexpectedly Negative! US July Retail Sales Drop 0.6% Month-over-Month, Marking the Largest Decline in Over a Year

marsbit38m ago

Staking Inflation Reforms Trap Ethereum and Solana

The article discusses the "Morton's Fork" dilemma facing both Ethereum and Solana, where both blockchains must choose between two paths that lead to the same outcome: increased centralization of their validator networks. Ethereum researchers have proposed EIP-8363, a "Progressive Issuance Burn" plan. It would gradually increase the proportion of validator rewards burned as the total staked ETH rises, aiming to reduce new token issuance. If staking reaches 50% of the supply, rewards would drop to zero. This proposal has faced strong opposition from major staking service providers and DeFi platforms (e.g., Aave, ether.fi), as staking yields form a crucial base rate for DeFi leverage strategies. Critics argue slashing rewards would first hurt small, individual node operators due to fixed operational costs, accelerating centralization. Solana faces a similar challenge. Its validators have fixed costs but rely heavily on token issuance for rewards (only ~13% of validator income comes from fees). Two current proposals, SIMD-0550 and SIMD-0553, aim to accelerate the reduction of its inflation rate and increase fee burns, respectively. A vote concludes on August 18th. The core conflict is between large token holders (whose assets are diluted by issuance) and the concentrated staking industry that depends on high yields. While reducing issuance could curb the influx of capital into centralized staking services, it could also force out smaller validators first. The article concludes that as blockchains grow into large financial systems, underlying economic forces—yields, leverage, and operational costs—ultimately constrain their original design visions and push them toward centralization, regardless of the specific policy path chosen.

marsbit2h ago

Staking Inflation Reforms Trap Ethereum and Solana

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片