Jack Ma Just Concluded an AI Mobilization Meeting, and the 'Soul Figure' of Qwen Left

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

A major leadership shakeup has hit Alibaba's AI division following a high-level strategic meeting. Ma Yun, along with core executives from Alibaba and Ant Group, convened on March 3rd to signal a full commitment to AI. However, the very next day, Lin Junyang, the 32-year-old P10 technical lead and key architect behind Alibaba’s open-source Qwen large language models, abruptly announced his resignation on social media platform X. Reports suggest the departure was not voluntary. The trigger appears to be an internal restructuring plan for the Qwen team. The plan, from the Tongyi Lab, aimed to break up Lin’s vertically integrated, full-stack team into separate, horizontally divided modules reporting directly to the lab, which would significantly reduce his management scope. This clashed fundamentally with Lin's belief that deep collaboration within a full-process team is essential for LLM innovation. The incident highlights a growing tension within Alibaba between the open-source technical ideals championed by Lin and the company's increasing focus on commercial returns from AI. Despite Qwen's global open-source success—topping Hugging Face downloads with over 1 billion—internal skepticism about its revenue potential and pressure from competitors were mounting. Lin's resignation has sent shockwaves through the global AI community, prompting an outpouring of support. Several key Qwen team members have also resigned. His departure marks a pivotal moment for Alibaba AI, signalin...

Author: Hu Shixin, Deep Net · Tencent News Xiaoman Studio

Editor: Ye Jinyan

On March 3, Jack Ma, along with core executives from Alibaba and Ant Group such as Joe Tsai, Wu Yongming, Shao Xiaofeng, Jiang Fan, as well as Ant Group's Jing Xiandong and Han Xinyi, made a rare gathering at YunGu School in Hangzhou. This discussion, the first stop after the New Year's resumption of work, focused on the opportunities and challenges brought by AI, sending a strong strategic signal to the outside world that both groups are "All in AI".

Dramatically, on the early morning of the next day after this high-level discussion concluded, the technical leader who single-handedly pushed Alibaba's Qwen to the pinnacle of global open source, the youngest P10 in the group, Lin Junyang, suddenly posted on social platform X: "me stepping down. bye my beloved qwen." This update ignited the global AI community.

Overnight, Alibaba's Qwen lost its "helmsman".

(Lin Junyang's latest update on X)

Was Lin Junyang's Departure Voluntary?

Based on information from multiple sources, we have reconstructed the key points of this departure incident.

On the evening of March 2, Lin Junyang's team released four small-scale open-source models of Qwen3.5, which immediately attracted global attention from the tech community. Elon Musk even commented that they showed "impressive intelligence density," and Lin Junyang himself reposted the comment to express gratitude. On the same day, Alibaba officially announced the unification of its B-end and C-end large model brands under "Qwen," establishing it as the group's core AI brand.

According to reports from LatePost and Phoenix Net Technology, on the afternoon of March 3, Lin Junyang left an internal meeting due to disagreements, submitted his resignation to Alibaba, and informed the Qwen team. Some colleagues were moved to tears upon hearing the news.

On the evening of March 3, Lin Junyang reposted the song "A Toast to Myself" on his WeChat Moments.

In the early hours of March 4, Lin Junyang publicly announced his resignation on platform X. As of 4 PM today, the post had received over 10,000 likes and more than 1,400 comments. Numerous industry developers left messages thanking him and the Qwen team for their contributions to the open-source field. Official accounts of AI companies like MiniMax also appeared in the comments to express recognition.

On the morning of March 4, Yu Bowen, head of Qwen post-training, and Li Kaixin, core contributor to Qwen3.5/VL/Coder, announced their resignations.

On the afternoon of March 4, Lin Junyang posted on his Moments: "Sorry friends, I won't be replying to messages and calls today. I really need to rest. Brothers of Qwen, keep working according to the original plan. It will be fine."

It is worth noting that Qwen team core contributor Chen Cheng said bluntly when forwarding Lin Junyang's post: "My heart is truly broken. I know leaving wasn't your choice. Just last night, we were standing side by side releasing the Qwen3.5 small models. I can't imagine what Qwen will be like without you."

This comment fueled the rapid spread of the involuntary departure theory within the industry. As of now, Alibaba has not publicly responded to this personnel change. A source close to Alibaba believes that Lin Junyang's resignation was not voluntary, and his quick posting of the resignation notice on X was likely due to an inability to control his emotions at the time.

Why Did He Leave?

Lin Junyang's sudden departure caused a huge shock in the industry, leading to widespread speculation. At its root, it was the concentrated eruption of long-standing multiple conflicts within Alibaba regarding organizational structure, technical路线 (path/approach), commercial goals, and talent landscape.

The trigger likely came from a team restructuring. According to LatePost, the Tongyi Lab planned to break the vertically integrated R&D model of the Qwen team. The original full-process closed-loop team covering pre-training, post-training, multimodal R&D, and infrastructure building was to be split into several independent horizontal modules, all directly managed and coordinated by the Tongyi Lab. Consequently, Lin Junyang's management authority and business scope would be narrowed.

Behind the structural adjustment lies a fundamental conflict in large model development philosophy between Lin Junyang and Alibaba's top management. Lin Junyang believes that the core competitiveness of large model R&D comes from the deep collaboration of a full-process team. Fragmented assembly-line division of labor would severely damage R&D efficiency and innovation space, and his team had already built a self-developed infrastructure system. The lab's direction of splitting and dispersing the work was completely contrary to his judgment of the development trend of large model technology.

Even harder to reconcile than the technical route分歧 (divergence/disagreement) is the deep-seated contradiction between the open-source route and the group's commercial goals. Under Lin Junyang's leadership, Qwen topped the global open-source large model rankings with a comprehensive open-source strategy, becoming a benchmark for Chinese large models going global. However, Alibaba's core assessment of Qwen has shifted from building technical influence to commercial落地 (landing/commercialization).

However, there have always been internal doubts about the revenue efficiency of the open-source model. It is reported that some executives even评价 (evaluated) the Qwen-3.5, which debuted on New Year's Eve, as an unfinished "semi-product." Coupled with the market pressure from the Qwen App's 3 billion RMB subsidy in the C-end not meeting expectations and the B-end AI cloud business facing aggressive competition from rivals, the misalignment between technical ideals and commercial goals became increasingly difficult to reconcile.

Behind this change, the restructuring of the talent landscape within the Tongyi Lab also led to a dilution of core decision-making power. Since 2025, Alibaba has continuously引入 (brought in) top global AI talent. After IEEE Fellow Xu Zhuhong transferred to the Tongyi Lab, the business he was responsible for overlapped significantly with Qwen's布局 (layout/plan). In early 2026, former DeepMind senior researcher Zhou Hao joined, reporting directly to the head of the lab, and was also set to take over the work of the departing post-training head Yu Bowen.

The lab's shift from a Lin Junyang-led single-core model to a "multi-power parallel" structure,叠加 (coupled with) the successive loss of Qwen's core founding team members, contributed to this industry-shaking departure incident.

Who Can Replace Lin Junyang?

The reason this departure caused连锁 (chain) reactions within Alibaba and the global open-source community lies in Lin Junyang's key industry status within the Qwen team, Alibaba's AI system, and even the global open-source large model field.

As a rare, entirely locally grown technical leader in China's AI industry, Lin Junyang, born in 1993, has an interdisciplinary background with a bachelor's degree in Computer Science from Peking University and a master's degree in Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. This also gave him a unique advantage in large language model R&D.

After graduating with his master's degree in 2019, he chose not to study abroad but joined Alibaba DAMO Academy directly, starting as a senior algorithm engineer. He was promoted four levels in 6 years, becoming Alibaba's youngest P10 technical expert at 32, standing shoulder to shoulder with technical leaders like Tang Jie from Zhipu AI, Yang Zhilin from MoonShot AI, and Yao Shunyu from Tencent (who have overseas PhD backgrounds), and跻身 (stepping into) the industry-recognized ranks of the "Four Heroes of Foundation Models" in China.

When Lin Junyang took over as technical lead of Tongyi Qianwen (Qwen) at the end of 2022, the domestic large model track was just emerging, and Alibaba's large model布局 (layout) had not yet formed a clear differentiated advantage. Under his leadership, Qwen embarked on a comprehensive open-source strategy, creating a model family covering full parameter sizes from 0.8B to 72B. The trillion-parameter flagship model Qwen3-Max, launched in 2025, surpassed同期 (contemporary) international mainstream models in多项 (multiple) evaluations like GPQA.

As of January 2026, the number of derivative models of the Qwen series on Hugging Face, the world's largest AI open-source community, exceeded 200,000, with downloads surpassing 1 billion, firmly ranking first globally for open-source large models. Stanford University's "2025 AI Index Report" showed that the performance gap between top Chinese and US AI large models narrowed to 0.3%, with Qwen's core model contribution ranking third globally.

After Lin Junyang's departure, two main doubts arose externally.

  • Who will succeed Lin Junyang? According to internal sources, due to the suddenness of the incident, there is currently no candidate who can fully replace Lin Junyang. His originally responsible full-stack management work will be decomposed into multiple parallel teams following the team split.
  • Where will Lin Junyang go? A long-time Alibaba industry observer stated that there is a high probability he will start his own business independently, or possibly join a明星 (star) team focused on embodied AI or world models. The probability of being persuaded to stay is very small.

For Alibaba AI, the primary heavy impact brought by this personnel change is the risk of a chain reaction of core team loss and dampened team morale. According to Phoenix Net Technology, Alibaba's top management is still communicating with him to try to retain Lin Junyang.

Within just three months, the technical lead, post-training lead, code lead, and other early core founding members of Qwen have resigned successively. This will not only directly affect the subsequent iteration rhythm of the Qwen model but may also trigger further talent loss.

Lin Junyang's departure is a标志性 (symbolic) node marking a comprehensive gear shift in Alibaba's AI strategy. This means Alibaba's large model will bid farewell to the stage focused on building technical benchmarks and global open-source ecosystem construction, and fully transition to a new cycle centered on commercial落地 (landing/commercialization).

But what lies ahead for Alibaba is the disruption to the R&D rhythm caused by the loss of the core team, fluctuations in trust within the global open-source ecosystem, and intense industry competition from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The chain reaction caused by this personnel shock will directly test the落地韧性 (landing resilience) of Alibaba's All in AI strategy.

Related Questions

QWho is Lin Junyang and what was his role at Alibaba's Qwen project?

ALin Junyang was the technical leader of Alibaba's Qwen project, responsible for driving its open-source strategy and development. He was the youngest P10-level technical expert at Alibaba and a key figure in establishing Qwen as a leading global open-source large model.

QWhat event triggered Lin Junyang's sudden resignation from Alibaba?

ALin Junyang resigned following an internal meeting disagreement on March 3, where he reportedly left the meeting abruptly and submitted his resignation. The restructuring of the Qwen team and conflicts over technical and commercial strategies were key factors.

QHow did the global AI community react to Lin Junyang's departure?

AThe global AI community expressed shock and appreciation for Lin Junyang's contributions. His announcement on X received over 10,000 likes and 1,400 comments, with developers and AI companies like MiniMax thanking him for his work in open-source AI.

QWhat were the underlying reasons for the conflict leading to Lin Junyang's resignation?

AThe conflict arose from disagreements over team restructuring, technical approaches, and commercial goals. Lin advocated for integrated team collaboration, while Alibaba's leadership pushed for a divided, modular structure focused on commercialization, leading to irreconcilable differences.

QWhat impact might Lin Junyang's departure have on Alibaba's AI strategy?

AHis departure signals a shift in Alibaba's AI strategy from open-source ecosystem building to commercialization. It risks team morale, talent retention, and Qwen's development pace, while intensifying competition with rivals like ByteDance and Tencent.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is DOGE M

Doge Matrix ($doge m): The New Breed of Community-Driven Cryptocurrency Introduction In the ever-evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, new projects constantly emerge, each aiming to capture the interest of investors and enthusiasts alike. One of the latest entrants to this domain is Doge Matrix, represented by the ticker symbol $doge m. This project has attracted attention thanks to its roots in the popular meme culture surrounding Dogecoin, establishing its place within the web3 space. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Doge Matrix, covering its overview, creator, investors, functionality, timeline, and notable aspects. What is Doge Matrix ($doge m)? Doge Matrix is a community-driven cryptocurrency project that seemingly builds upon the widespread appeal of Dogecoin, a digital currency known for its Shiba Inu mascot and its meme origins. While the overarching objectives of Doge Matrix are not extensively defined, it is characterized by a commitment to harnessing community involvement and support. Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies that often emphasize utility or intrinsic value through underlying technologies, Doge Matrix positions itself within a space that embraces the cultural phenomenon of cryptocurrencies, particularly appealing to those who resonate with the ethos of meme-based assets. Drawing on the strengths of the Dogecoin community, Doge Matrix operates as part of a broader ecosystem, inviting participation and engagement from users who share an interest in cryptocurrency and the digital landscape. Who is the Creator of Doge Matrix ($doge m)? The identity of the creator of Doge Matrix remains unknown. This lack of transparency is not an uncommon occurrence in the cryptocurrency space, where some projects are launched without revealing the identities of their founders. The absence of information regarding the founding team can raise questions among potential investors about the project’s accountability and direction. Who are the Investors of Doge Matrix ($doge m)? As it stands, there is no publicly available information detailing the investors or investment foundations that back Doge Matrix. The project appears to rely primarily on community support rather than institutional investment. This model aligns with the community-driven nature of the initiative, fostering an environment where the direction of the project is shaped by its participants rather than being dictated by a select few financial backers. How Does Doge Matrix ($doge m) Work? The specifics regarding the operational mechanisms of Doge Matrix are somewhat vague, reflecting a broader trend of projects in the meme coin space where innovative functionalities are not always clearly articulated. Nonetheless, Doge Matrix seems designed to tap into the existing cryptocurrency ecosystem by encouraging user participation while tapping into the familiar cultural references associated with Dogecoin. Its potentially unique characteristics derive from community interactions rather than technological advancements, emphasizing shared experiences and collaboration among token holders. While the exact innovations have not been explicitly outlined, the project appears to create a space where community members can engage, share ideas, and propel the project's potential forward. Timeline of Doge Matrix ($doge m) Reflecting on the project’s timeline reveals notable events that have defined its journey thus far: November 25, 2024: Doge Matrix reached its all-time high value, marking a significant milestone in its early history. January 1, 2025: Conversely, Doge Matrix hit its all-time low value, illustrating the volatility often associated with cryptocurrencies, especially in the early stages of a project's lifecycle. Ongoing: The project continues to be actively traded and supported by its community, although specific future milestones or objectives have yet to be disclosed. Key Points About Doge Matrix ($doge m) Community Focus At the heart of Doge Matrix is a commitment to community engagement. The project thrives on the premise of collaboration and shared objectives among its members, emphasizing the importance of collective effort. Unlike centralized projects that often have a defined leadership structure, Doge Matrix at present showcases a more fluid approach to governance, where every community member's voice matters. Volatility The cryptocurrency market is notorious for its volatility, and Doge Matrix is no exception. Its price history reflects significant fluctuations between high and low values, which is typical of many new cryptocurrencies but underscores the risks associated with investment in emerging tokens. Lack of Detailed Information One of the most striking features about Doge Matrix is the scarcity of detailed information regarding its technological underpinnings and operational mechanisms. This ambiguity necessitates that potential investors conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with the project. Conclusion In summary, Doge Matrix ($doge m) illustrates a new wave of cryptocurrency projects that lean heavily on community engagement and cultural relevance. While lacking in certain specifics—such as clear leadership, defined objectives, and detailed functionality—the project has managed to generate interest within the crypto community, leveraging the established appeal of meme culture. As with any investment in the cryptocurrency space, understanding the inherent risks and conducting comprehensive research is essential for potential participants. Doge Matrix stands as a reminder of the dynamic, sometimes unpredictable nature of the crypto industry, marked by constant evolution and enthusiasm for community-driven initiatives.

3.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.02.03Updated 2025.02.03

What is DOGE M

What is $M

Understanding Mantis ($M): A New Era in Cross-Chain Interoperability In the continually evolving landscape of Web3 and cryptocurrency, new projects strive to offer innovative solutions aimed at enhancing the user experience and expanding functional possibilities within the decentralized financial ecosystem. One such project garnering attention is Mantis ($M), a pioneering protocol founded on the principles of cross-chain interoperability and intent-based settlements. This article delves into the essential aspects of Mantis, including its core functionality, creators, investment backing, innovative features, and critical milestones. What is Mantis ($M)? Mantis is described as a multi-domain intent settlement protocol that simplifies cross-chain interactions, enabling users to execute complex financial transactions across various blockchain platforms seamlessly. The protocol operates through three primary layers: Intent Expression: Users can articulate their transaction goals using natural language facilitated by the DISE LLM, an advanced AI language model. For instance, a user might express a desire to swap Ethereum (ETH) for Solana (SOL) with a specific slippage tolerance of 1%. Execution: This layer employs a network of solvers that compete to fulfill user intents. Transactions are executed using mechanisms such as Coincidence of Wants (CoWs) and Order Flow Auctions (OFAs), which ensure that user demands are met optimally. Settlement: Leveraging the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol, Mantis enables atomic cross-chain transactions, allowing users to operate across various supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. Mantis is engineered to introduce native yield generation for idle assets, employing cryptographic proofs to maintain the integrity of transactions throughout the entire process. Creators & Development Team Mantis was conceived by the Composable Foundation, a research-driven organization notable for its emphasis on blockchain interoperability solutions. This foundation collaborates with esteemed academic institutions, including Harvard University and the University of Lisbon, contributing to extensive research and development efforts that inform Mantis's architecture and functionality. The Composable Foundation’s commitment to fostering innovation in the blockchain space positions Mantis as a robust solution for the growing demand for interoperability among multiple blockchain networks. Investors & Backing While specific details about individual investors have not been publicly disclosed, Mantis enjoys substantial backing from various entities, including: Ecosystem grants from IBC-enabled chains, which support the protocol's growth and integration within decentralized finance ecosystems. Strategic partnerships with infrastructure providers that enhance Mantis's network capabilities and deployment strategies. Funding through the Composable Foundation's treasury, ensuring sustained financial support for ongoing development and operational costs. These collaborative efforts reflect a consensus among stakeholders about the importance of enhancing cross-chain functionality and the potential utility of Mantis's infrastructural innovations. Key Innovations Mantis sets itself apart through several pioneering innovations that enhance its functionality and utility: Chain-Agnostic Intents: Users can initiate transactions from any supported chain while settling on another. This flexibility empowers users, driving increased interaction among different platforms. AI-Powered Interface: The integration of DISE LLM allows users to conduct complex DeFi operations using natural language, thereby simplifying interactions and making blockchain technology accessible to a broader audience. Cross-Domain MEV Capture: Mantis creates an internal market for maximal extractable value (MEV) through competitions among solvers. This innovative approach allows for greater efficiency and value extraction in complex transactions. Modular Settlement Layer: The protocol supports various verification methods, including zero-knowledge proofs and optimistic rollups, providing a versatile framework that can adapt to emerging blockchain technologies. Historical Timeline Mantis's development is marked by several critical milestones that chart its trajectory and growth: | Year | Milestone | |————|————————————————————————-| | 2022 | Initial concept development within the Composable Foundation's research division. | | Q3 2024 | Launch of the testnet with bridging capabilities between Solana and Ethereum. | | Q1 2025 | Anticipated Token Generation Event (TGE) alongside the mainnet launch. | | Q2 2025 | Expected integration of DISE LLM and expansion of cross-chain capabilities. | | 2025 H2 | Planned support for over 15 chains through further IBC upgrades. | This timeline outlines Mantis's evolution, from conceptual discussions to active implementation and future growth phases. Ecosystem Growth Strategy Mantis's strategy for ecosystem growth includes several initiatives designed to encourage user participation and developer engagement: Credits System: Users can earn protocol credits by providing liquidity and engaging in referral programs. These credits are redeemable for incentives in the future, fostering a robust user community. Modular Software Development Kit (SDK): This toolkit empowers developers to create applications based on intent-driven models utilizing Mantis's infrastructure, thus promoting innovation within its ecosystem. Governance Model: As the protocol matures, $M token holders will have a voice in protocol governance, allowing them to vote on proposed upgrades and changes, thereby enhancing community engagement and decentralization. Mantis represents a significant advancement in the realm of cross-chain architecture. By seamlessly integrating advanced AI algorithms with a robust settlement framework, Mantis seeks to tackle the problems of fragmentation within multi-chain ecosystems. Its innovative approach prioritizes improved user experiences while adhering to the foundational principles of decentralization and security, setting a new standard for the future interoperability of blockchain technologies. As Mantis continues its journey of growth and implementation, it promises to be a project to watch closely in the competitive landscape of Web3 and decentralized finance. With its focus on crossing boundaries and elevating user engagement, Mantis is poised to be an integral part of the future developments in the cryptocurrency space.

244 Total ViewsPublished 2025.03.18Updated 2025.03.18

What is $M

How to Buy M

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing MemeCore (M) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy MemeCore (M) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your MemeCore (M)After purchasing your MemeCore (M), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade MemeCore (M)Easily trade MemeCore (M) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

6.5k Total ViewsPublished 2025.07.02Updated 2025.07.10

How to Buy M

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of M (M) are presented below.

活动图片