How Does The XRP Ledger Fit Into SWIFT’s Move To Process Blockchain Transactions Across 25 Banks?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-26Last updated on 2026-03-26

Abstract

Crypto pundit Pumpius claims that SWIFT is quietly using the XRP Ledger as a front-end solution for its new blockchain-based cross-border payment system, rather than developing its own. This follows SWIFT’s announcement of a partnership with over 25 banks to enable 24/7 transactions using distributed ledger technology. Pumpius alleges that SWIFT is effectively adopting XRP as a neutral bridge asset it could not build itself, despite publicly working with ConsenSys and financial institutions on an independent ledger. Meanwhile, the Bank for International Settlements highlighted XRP as one of the top five cryptocurrencies banks are exposed to, signaling growing institutional acceptance. At the time of writing, XRP was trading around $1.40.

Crypto pundit Pumpius has explained how the XRP Ledger fits into SWIFT’s plans to process on-chain payments through its partnership with banks. This came as the pundit alleged that SWIFT plans to use the network as the front end rather than its own distributed ledger.

XRP Ledger’s Role In SWIFT’s Plan For On-Chain Transactions

In an X post, Pumpius alleged that SWIFT is quietly whitelabeling the XRP Ledger front-end while pretending that the network is their innovation. He made this comment in response to news that SWIFT plans to launch 24/7 cross-border payments using blockchain technology in partnership with over 25 major banks.

Pumpius further alleged that SWIFT has been running pilots with Ripple partners, bridging ISO 20022, and that now it is clear what they are trying to achieve. He declared that the old financial guard is being forced to adopt what they spent years fighting. The pundit added that SWIFT is adopting the Ledger because XRP has always been the neutral bridge asset they could never build themselves.

However, it is worth noting that SWIFT has announced it is developing its distributed ledger in partnership with ConsenSys to enable 24/7 cross-border payments. SWIFT is also developing the ledger in partnership with over 30 financial institutions, which will use it. So far, there hasn’t been any mention of SWIFT using the Ledger as Pumpius claims.

However, crypto pundit Archie pointed out that some of these banks that SWIFT has partnered with are also Ripple’s partners, a development he said is the ultimate bull signal for holders. The pundit suggested that these banks could still integrate in one way or another, even as they move to create their own distributed ledger.

BIS Highlights XRP’s Dominance Among Top 5 Cryptos

Archie drew attention to the Bank for International Settlements post, which highlighted XRP as one of the major cryptocurrencies investors were seeking exposure to. The pundit again described this as the ultimate bull signal. The BIS released its updated Basel III monitoring dashboard and identified the altcoin as one of the top 5 cryptocurrencies for which underlying banks are reporting exposures.

XRP is notably mentioned alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. Archie noted that banks worldwide are now classifying and disclosing their holdings under the global regulatory framework. He added that traditional finance (TradFi) is no longer fighting crypto but is instead measuring and preparing for its adoption. Based on this, he declared that the floodgates are opening and that the original bridge asset, which is XRP, is already inside the system.

At the time of writing, the altcoin’s price is trading at around $1.40, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.38 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat role does the XRP Ledger allegedly play in SWIFT's new plan for processing blockchain transactions?

ACrypto pundit Pumpius alleges that SWIFT is quietly whitelabeling the XRP Ledger as the front-end for its new on-chain payment system, rather than using its own innovation.

QHow many banks is SWIFT partnering with for its new blockchain-based cross-border system?

ASWIFT is partnering with over 25 major banks to launch its 24/7 cross-border payment system using blockchain technology.

QWhat reason does Pumpius give for why SWIFT would adopt the XRP Ledger?

APumpius claims that SWIFT is adopting the XRP Ledger because XRP is the neutral bridge asset that they could never build themselves.

QWhich major cryptocurrencies did the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) list as top assets for bank exposure?

AThe BIS listed XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana as the top 5 cryptocurrencies for which underlying banks are reporting exposures.

QWhat does the pundit Archie suggest is the significance of banks classifying their crypto holdings under the Basel III framework?

AArchie suggests that this classification shows TradFi is no longer fighting crypto but is instead measuring and preparing for its adoption, signaling that 'the floodgates are opening'.

Related Reads

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手12m ago

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手12m ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News2h ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News2h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片