Hong Kong tightens crypto rules for dealers and custodians – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

Hong Kong has introduced a new licensing regime for virtual asset dealers and custodians, completing a key part of its regulatory framework. The rules, modeled on existing securities standards, require strict compliance for handling private keys and executing trades. This move aims to attract institutional investors by ensuring high levels of security and oversight across the ecosystem. The city encourages early engagement with regulators through pre-application discussions. Further regulations for advisors and asset managers are underway. Officials emphasize the framework balances innovation, risk management, and investor protection. Similar regulatory developments are occurring globally, including in Europe and Russia, signaling a broader shift toward a licensed and supervised crypto industry.

For the past year, Hong Kong’s crypto plans felt incomplete.

Retail trading platforms had rules to follow, but the most important players, custodians who protect assets and dealers who handle big trades, were still operating without clear guidelines.

And, finally, on Christmas Eve, that changed.

Hong Kong’s new crypto rules

The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the SFC have now finished consultations on a new licensing system for virtual asset dealers and custodians.

By regulating these mid-level players, the city is finally prepared to welcome serious institutional investors who expect top-tier safety.

Hong Kong’s motto, “same business, same risks, same rules,” is no longer just a slogan.

The new licenses are modeled on existing Type 1 securities rules, meaning crypto dealers will now follow the same strict standards as traditional finance.

Custodians, in particular, must prove they can handle private keys safely, a crucial part of protecting investor funds.

This update doesn’t just plug a gap in the system.

It completes the SFC’s ASPIRe roadmap and turns Hong Kong’s crypto market into a system built for institutional trust, where every part of the process, from storing assets to executing trades, is carefully monitored.

Discussion prevails finalization

Unlike many countries that take a tough stance on crypto, Hong Kong is inviting firms to talk to regulators early, before the rules are fully finalized.

These “pre-application discussions” give early applicants an advantage, helping them prepare and avoid surprises later.

Meanwhile, new rules are already in progress.

The next stage focuses on virtual asset advisors and asset managers, ensuring that the people who give guidance and manage money follow the same high standards as trading platforms.

This keeps Hong Kong’s crypto environment connected, balanced, and transparent, not just in technology, but in human decision-making too.

Execs weighing in

Expressing the same, the Chief Executive Officer of the SFC, Ms Julia Leung, said,

“The significant progress in our VA regulatory framework ensures Hong Kong remains at the global forefront of digital asset market developments by fostering a trusted, competitive and sustainable ecosystem.”

Echoing similar sentiments, the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, added,

“ The proposed licensing regimes strike a prudent balance among fostering market development, managing risks and protecting investors.”

This comes at a time when a lot of changes are happening in Spain and Russia, showing that the days of waiting to regulate crypto are over.

Other countries are going through similar developments

In Europe, Spain is fully adopting the MiCA framework, which gives crypto companies a strict deadline of 1st July 2026.

Meanwhile, Russia is taking a more practical approach with a system that limits how much regular investors can put in.

All this shows that in 2026, crypto will no longer be a free-for-all.

It will become a licensed, highly supervised industry where only firms that follow the rules can survive.


Final Thoughts

  • Hong Kong’s shift signals a new era of institutional-grade oversight, closing gaps in custody, dealing, advisory, and asset management.
  • By licensing dealers and custodians, the city is finally regulating the “invisible infrastructure” of crypto, not just the consumer-facing platforms.

Related Reads

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit39m ago

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit39m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片